Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

yet another wingnut claim about Clinton, what's the truth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:26 AM
Original message
yet another wingnut claim about Clinton, what's the truth?
Now I'm having one tell me that Clinton illegally sold nuclear technology to the Chinese in exchange for campaign funds.

If this is true (which I doubt), wouldn't that be a much more valid reaosn to pursue his impeachment than a blowjob?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
If this were true, Clinton would have been hanged, and he would deserve it.

You're right: if this had been true, the fact he lied about a blowjob would not have even been heard of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. My mom believes that as well
and now the Chinese have missiles pointed at both coasts. I think it's in a book she has. So I can't help with the truth, but I too am interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know the facts.
but I was under the impression that Nixon made friends with them and Reagan started selling them rockets to launch satellites. (An outsourcing thing because they could do it cheaper than NASA.)
These rockets could be altered to become missles aimed at us.

Please correct my misconceptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. They mean Loral...here's an article. Edited to add better link
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 12:48 AM by Solly Mack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a debunk
Looks pretty thorough. The waivers started under Bush, continued with Clinton and continue with Bush as well.

http://www.ithadtobeyou.net/carpe/archives/000360.html

http://www.loral.com/china-investigation.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It began under Reagan, I believe
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 12:45 AM by Solly Mack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You're probably right
I just skimmed through the articles. I read up on it a long time ago. Aren't these companies connected more to Bush, my very hazy memory seems to recall that there was more Republican pressure on this than Democratic, under Clinton. But I'm not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. More of a connection to Republicans than to Clinton, yes
and this was just one more push by the GOP to find something on Clinton..to try and impeach him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep...that's the correct story. That's why they didn't pursue Loral...
...or Clinton on this particular charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. so what? bush is in charge
tell him since bush is in charge now he should fix it--send in the fleet..shit, he just did that. ask him if bush attacks china where is he going to shop and what is he going to but that isn`t made in china?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hey, if these morons are still obsessing over Clinton, they have given up
on the Chimp. Let them believe what they want. Ask them if they think we should impeach Clinton. Remind them that Clinton's legacy is so powerful (and W's so weak) that they still think he is president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Starr Couldn't Find Any Dirt On Clinton
Other than spending years and $70 Million of the taxpayer's dollars to nail him for one bj.

Or was Starr taking money from the Chinese too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. One BJ?
I think there were lots of bj's. Then there was that cigar thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. most weapon and tech secrets are sold by the MIC itself.
they'd sell their wife and kids for a few bucks. plus, it raises the need for new counter-technology when the opposition gets the old stuff on line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC