Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About that UNOCAL pipeline in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:14 AM
Original message
About that UNOCAL pipeline in Afghanistan
Is it now being built?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. no, there isn't enough security and the Warlords want too much
$$$$ to let it pass thru their territories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Still working on it. Seems Afghanistan has a lot of oil and gas too.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/afghan.html

Afghanistan as an Energy Transit Route
Due to its location between the oil and natural gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and the Indian Ocean, Afghanistan has long been mentioned as a potential pipeline route, though in the near term, several obstacles will likely prevent Afghanistan from becoming an energy transit corridor. During the mid-1990s, Unocal had pursued a possible natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan's Dauletabad-Donmez gas basin via Afghanistan to Pakistan, but pulled out after the U.S. missile strikes against Afghanistan in August 1998. The Afghan government under President Karzai has tried to revive the Trans-Afghan Pipeline (TAP) plan, with periodic talks held between the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan on the issue, but little progress appears to have been made as of early June 2004 (despite the signature on December 9, 2003, of a protocol on the pipeline by the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan). President Karzai has stated his belief that the project could generate $100-$300 million per year in transit fees for Afghanistan, while creating thousands of jobs in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
talkinghand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nope.
As I recall, the amount of oil and gas in the area was supposedly "overestimated," precluding further development of the resources there.

I think we can safely assume that the ability to back our tankers up to the convenient supply lines coming out of Iraq due to our "adventures" there has rendered the exploitation of Afghani gas and minerals unnecessary for now.

I read it costs $1 a barrel to product Iraqi oil. This is easy pickens -- no oil company in its right mind is finding it necessary to spend billions on unwieldy projects such as the proposed Unocal pipeline.

Looks to me like the present administration took the shortcut here -- getting even more out of the deal than had the U.S. relied on the overtaking of Afghanistan alone.

The occupation of Afghanistan, in addition to the ouster of the Taliban/Al Queda factions, also provides a nice pincer effect on Iran -- when combined with the Iraqi occupation. I won't be surprised if the overthrow of Iran is next on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC