Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry: 'I am against the war'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: Kerry: 'I am against the war'
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 08:44 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
Is Kerry for or against the war in Iraq? "I think the president made a mistake in the way he took us to war," says Kerry. "I am against the war - the way the president went to war was wrong."

The Senate Intelligence Committee has just issued a report saying that the basis for the war was erroneous, and that there weren't weapons of mass destruction. Given what he knows now about that report, would Kerry have made the same decision?

"What I voted for was an authority for the president to go to war as a last resort if Saddam Hussein did not disarm and we needed to go to war," says Kerry. "I think the way he went to war was a mistake."

"I know you want to make this black and white, but the difference is - if John Kerry were president of the United States, we would never be in this place," adds Edwards. "He would never have done what George Bush did. He would have done the hard work to build the alliances and the support system."

"Why build an alliance if they didn't have weapons of mass destruction," asks Stahl.

"We would have found out, that's the point," says Edwards.

Regardless, Kerry says he doesn't regret his vote: "I believe, based on the information we have, it was the correct vote."

Edwards has said that if he is elected "no young Americans will go to war needlessly."

"That's true," says Edwards. "He (President Bush) didn't do the things that should have been done before taking this country to war. This is not a – I mean, we've now said it 10 times, this is not a complicated thing."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/07/60minutes/main627965.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. he'd just do a better job at lieing about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't understand your post
could you please put it in terms clear enough for a simpleton like me to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. trust no one... but trust Bush The Least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. In what way is that statement related to your first post?
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 08:54 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
To me, it appears to be totally unrelated.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Kerry...
is the lesser of two evils. Hopefully he;ll take up the 'regular' baton before the Bush fiasco. but the regular ain't so perty either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about: Kerry is against the war, but needs to walk a fine line
in order to win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
79. I agree with you. He has to walk a fine line to win so that he can get
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 12:13 AM by merh
into office and figure how the hell he can fix the mess * has made of things. My gosh, if we expect him to say that he will pull out the troops on the first day he is in office we are expecting far too much of any human and/or god. He hasn't a clue as to how bad things truly are until he takes the office and by then, the weed that would be king will have another couple of months to screw things up.

*&Co accused Clinton and his staff of ruining computers in the west wing, later it was determined that those were bold faced lies (how surprising). Just imagine how * & co. will cheney things up before they leave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. He always was against the war but voted for it for political reasons...
and he is still afraid of saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sounds to me like you failed to understand what Kerry and Edwards said.
Maybe you should read it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Rofl
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 08:49 PM by DaveSZ
The Repubs do have somewhat of a point about Kerry.

I don't even know what he's for or against when it comes to the war. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Kerry does straddle issues
If he didn't, this poll wouldn't exist.

Bush gives an ostensibly firm answer, but either lies or changes his mind about it later.

The corporate media then spins it as if he had been a “firm” leader all along.

And fuck the people who say I'm not allowed to criticize Kerry just because Bush is the greater evil.

That would make me little better than the knuckle draggers who have Newsmax as their homepage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Are you saying you prefer the dishonestly simplistic rhetoric of Bush
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 09:11 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
to Kerry's more honest and frank discussion of the true complexity of the issues facing us?



Kerry does straddle issues

If he didn't, this poll wouldn't exist.


That statement, I can only describe as idiotic. It's like saying that because Republicans repeat something often enough, it must be true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
77. Look at the answers to this poll. They're split.
Even this crowd is isn't sure where Kerry stands on this.

He DOES straddle issues. He DOES come off as the consumate politician, who speaks and speaks and never says anything. I don't think we're doing ourselves any favors by refusing to criticize this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #77
85. Ad Populum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm giving Kerry the benefit of the doubt
I don't think he's lying. I just really wish he and Edwards hadn't voted for that damn thing. I know he's saying that he was lied to by Bush, but I thought the war was the wrong thing to do regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. If Bush had allowed Inspections and Diplomacy to run its course
there would have been no invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Very true
But in the end, IWR was an authoriztion to use force if necessary. I know Kerry has said that he went along with it so that we could get the inspectors in there and it worked in that regard. Bush just wanted the war so badly that he didn't give them time to work. I just think giving Bush that authorization was a big mistake. It was an abuse of power on the administration's part and I think Kerry should have seen it coming. But he didn't.

Oh well. Water under the bridge. I guess the real issue now is how is Kerry going to get us out of this mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Exactly
IWR was an authoriztion to use force if necessary.

Since it wasn't neccesary, Bush violated the resolution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
80. yes, let's authorize Bush do it if necessary...and the one party system
chooses when its necessary? or did someone else choose? cuz i'll be darned if he didntt turn around and start necessetating it and strongarming the security council into looking the other way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. It is my understanding that Powell promised that diplomacy would run
its course, that they would do everything they could to avoid going to war.

Despite what you and I think, Powell had credibility then, and probably believed it himself. . .but of course now we know Powell was out of the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's against "the way the president went to war"
So what does that mean? I guess a pre-emptive war based on lies is ok if we build a coalition and get UN approval first? What a crock of horseshit!

People don't like a candidate who isn't able to decide where he stands and state it clearly on an important issue. They better get a better line fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Kerry 'I am against the war'
that is the quote I am asking about.

Do you think Kerry was lying, or telling the truth, when he said:

"I am against the war"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. I'm talking about the entire quote, in context
He can't even say he's against the war without equivocating and saying he's against the "way" we went to war. How many times can you go back and forth on one issue in one paragraph?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Is the world so simple that it can be explained in one word answers?

Indeed, that is what the Bush campaign wants the American people to believe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
83. Kerry knows that he voted to approve HJ Res 114, the legislation
that approved the military action. He cannot come out now and say I am against the war without explaining why now is different from his vote in Oct. of 2002. Therefore, he says, if I knew now what I knew then. Have any of you read the resolution? It is filled with the lies of the weed and his theives, that SH had ties to the terrorist attacks of 9/11, that Iraq had WMDs and chemical and biological weapons. All the lies that the WH told the American people they told Congress.

Kerry answered the question honestly. It was not wishy washy or a flip flop.

He can't say what he will do when elected because he hasn't a clue how cheney'd up things are. The best he can tell us is that he will reach out to the international community. We all know that he has a chance in his efforts in reaching out the other nations, because, the majority of them, like us want * out of the office. They hate and distrust him as much as we do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
104. Agreed! At this point we need to know where he stands.
Why should we have to decipher what his intentions were and are about THE most important issue facing the next president?

He needs to speak clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry just wants to get elected.
There's nothing wrong with that, but that motivation explains why Kerry fuzzes up some of the issues. In addition, the volatile situation in Iraq is changing quickly, which makes it stupid for Kerry to commit to a clear position in the middle of the summer.

Most importantly, while I have my doubts about people like Gephardt and Lieberman, I don't believe Kerry would have pulled the inspectors out of Iraq and started a war. IWR bullshit aside, this is what matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. So, how did you vote?
Do you think Kerry was lying, or telling the truth when he stated: "I am against the war" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I didn't vote!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Why not?
Does it scare you to face the fact that Kerry is actually against the war?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I don't know what "being for the war" means.
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 09:20 PM by JHBowden
While the slogan fits on a bumper sticker, it doesn't specify if it means Kerry would have attacked Iraq unilaterally, if Kerry would have attacked Iraq multilaterally, if Kerry supports the occupation, if Kerry would tolerate a fundamentalist Shi'ite republic, and so forth.

I personally don't think Kerry would have attacked Iraq unilaterally; I'm iffy on whether Kerry would have attacked multilaterally; I think Kerry does support the occupation, and I think Kerry's pragmatism would not tolerate a Shi'ite dominated government without some sort of intervention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. You really need to listen to the actual footage.
He never said what the article implies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. You really need to face up to the reality that Kerry is against the war.
"I am against the war" -- John Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. No. You need to face up to the fact that you didn't listen to the
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 10:00 PM by MiddleMen
actual interview.

He paused during Stahl's interruption. I am against (presumably the way Bush went to war but we will never know because then.... Stahl: Was the the war wrong Kerry: not speaking during interuption) Kerry: the war - the way Bush took us to war was wrong.

Sorry. Have to put your bashing stick away for now until you have some idea what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I heard you the first time.
Your characterization notwithstanding, there are two ways to vote in this election: pro-war (Bush, Nader) or anti-war (Kerry).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
66. ...jesus. the man voted for it, and said he'd send more troops.
if you want to see a man against the war, look at howard dean and DK.

god i wish dean had gotten the Nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. to quote howard dean, "the simple fact is, if it werent for democrats like
Kerry, we wouldnt be in iraq in the first place".

the man voted for the war. that was one of the statements i made, and it was truthful. and, by the way, he said he'd ask the UN to help- do you think he'd try and get other nation's forces there without sending more of our own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #72
82. No, it's not truthful
to say that Kerry 'voted for the war'. It is a misrepresentation and a mischaracterization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #82
86. what did he do, then? what the fuck did he cast a vote for? what did he
think would happen!!! maybe, i dont know, he thought bush would just keep on puttering around, i'm sure he didnt know that he'd wanted to invade iraq since the attempt on his daddy's life.

fucking a. what the fuck.

mods, you can delete this if you think i said Fuck too many times...its just that threads like these do nothing but sow dissension- and to top it all off...he's defending his argument poorly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #86
87. Bush did not follow the resolution. The resolution called for the UN
inspection process to be followed. Bush pulled the UN inspectors out and invaded even though Saddam was cooperating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. The vote for IWR was wrong
However, I do believe that Kerry is being truthful when he states that he does not agree with how Bush has used the authority IWR provided. The concept Kerry argues is likely the way he would have used such authority, specifically as a bargaining chip to leverage Saddam's compliance with an aggressive inspection program.

Unfortunately, those of us in the peace movement knew, without any shred of doubt, that Bush would never use the authority in this way. Bush's intent in going to congress was simply to gain political cover for a decision to go to war in Iraq that they had made probably on September 12, 2001, if not before.

To me the mistake was believing that Bush would handle this authority responsibly. My concern is less with Kerry's "support for War" because I do not think he ever intended IWR to be used this way. I remain concerned however over the concept that IWR was the equivalent of handing the 13 year old boy the car keys with the expectation that he would drive responsibly. Then, after the entirely predictable wreck, telling the public "I didn't think he would act this way and I do not approve they way he chose to drive". That is my problem with all this in a nutshell.

That being aside, it is well past time that we take the car keys away from the 13 year old. Kerry has my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. Sorry but the article is misrepresenting (through punctuation)
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 09:38 PM by MiddleMen
what was said in the interview.

The second link under multimedia will allow anyone who wishes to confirm this.

"I think the president made a mistake in the way he took us to war," says Kerry. "I am against" (interruption by Stahl "was the war wrong?") (Kerry stumbles due to to interruption) "the war - the way the president went to war was wrong."

There is no indication that he was going to deviate from the line simply criticizing the way Bush went to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. If bush had done it right, there would have been no invasion
if bush had followed diplomacy, let the inspectors do their job, gotten allies on board, there would have been no invasion.

No WMDs found by inspectors? no justification for invasion.

No WMDs, no broad coalition of allies. No Invasion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. I agree.
However that doesn't justify misrepresenting what was said. Not by CBS and not by a DU contributor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. I couldn't even answer the poll, I don't even know.
I've given Kerry money twice and I will vote for him. It's not because I agree with his strong stand on anything (well, the union picket line thing was cool) and it's not because he is charismatic enough to cover for this (like Edwards). I just hate Bush's guts more than anything else - ever. As I told the neocon freaks at work (to make them give up and go away) "I'd vote for a stinking pile of shit before I would vote for Bush". I am serious, I'd vote for a dead man before I'd vote for Bush (just like people did with Asscrack) - it's amazing how such violently hated people got into important places. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. It's pretty simple. Do you believe Kerry
when he states: "I am against the war" or do you think he is lying?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Why do you continue to misrepresent what was said?
Kerry has finished the line starting with "I am against... " with "the way Bush took us to war" how many times? Hundreds now surely. If he was changing it tonight then why not clearly state that after the interruption? Why not clearly say the war was wrong , which is the question Stahl interrupted with? It is right there on the CBS page for anyone who cares to deal with the actual interview instead of what they wish he said.

I don't have a problem with what he actually said but purposefully misrepresenting it is dishonest. He never spoke the sentence you are touting on this thread. Stahl never gave him a chance to and he didn't clear it up after the interruption. That is a fact not a characterization.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. WTF are you talking about?
You claim: "It is right there on the CBS page" wtf page are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
52. The video is right there on the CBS page you gave above.
2nd link under the multi-media section. Go listen to it and hear for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. I honestly don't know what he believes.
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 10:47 PM by ktf23t
I can't go by what he says. I was livid when he started viciously attacking Dean during the primary, I was even heard to say "I hate him". He's OK and I really like Edwards as his "charisma" crutch. He needs to be VERY CLEAR and UNWAIVERING when he gives his speech at the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. What I'm asking is if you believe he is a liar.


Do you think Kerry is a liar, or not?


It's a simple question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Asking if a politician is a liar is like asking "What color is outer space
I'm sure he's conflicted and may believe something different than what he says to get elected - I'm JUST NOT SURE!! And I don't even care so long as he is ELECTED OVER THE KILLER CHIMP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. 'Kiss my pass'- is that meant to be a clever way of saying 'kiss my ass'?
Wow, you are just a master of the English language.

LOL

I'm a 'punk'? :P Gee, that namecalling really adds weight to your argument...


Kerry: "I am against the war"

You: 'Is he for or against the war? How the heck can I tell from that statement??'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. the freepers will love this post. always good to see rankor at DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. im getting that vibe...check out my howard dean quote
right back atcha, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. You tell me to kiss your ass and I'm supposed to treat you with respect?
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #73
88. Your pathetic attempt to label me
a 'moron' or a 'troublemaker' barely merits a response, but I'll make one anyway.

All you've done is selectively quote from my original post:

Is Kerry for or against the war in Iraq? "I think the president made a mistake in the way he took us to war," says Kerry. "I am against the war - the way the president went to war was wrong."

The Senate Intelligence Committee has just issued a report saying that the basis for the war was erroneous, and that there weren't weapons of mass destruction. Given what he knows now about that report, would Kerry have made the same decision?

"What I voted for was an authority for the president to go to war as a last resort if Saddam Hussein did not disarm and we needed to go to war," says Kerry. "I think the way he went to war was a mistake."

"I know you want to make this black and white, but the difference is - if John Kerry were president of the United States, we would never be in this place," adds Edwards. "He would never have done what George Bush did. He would have done the hard work to build the alliances and the support system."

"Why build an alliance if they didn't have weapons of mass destruction," asks Stahl.

"We would have found out, that's the point," says Edwards.

Regardless, Kerry says he doesn't regret his vote: "I believe, based on the information we have, it was the correct vote."

Edwards has said that if he is elected "no young Americans will go to war needlessly."

"That's true," says Edwards. "He (President Bush) didn't do the things that should have been done before taking this country to war. This is not a � I mean, we've now said it 10 times, this is not a complicated thing."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/07/60minutes/main627965.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #88
90. So what's your point Belgian fry boy?
Putting in more of the quotes doesn't clarify things any - you are being silly now!

And getting caught up in my comments is a sure sign that you are just here taunting people because you are in a bad mood for some reason. Go to bed before you piss off everyone here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #90
91. My point is that calling me names just makes you appear inarticulate
or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. Yeah, but at least I answer your points even though I know you are
just here causing trouble.

You won't even do that - why is that??

Why can you dish it out but not take it??

What's gotten under your craw??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #92
96. WTF are you talking about?
What 'point' did you answer?



I know you are just here causing trouble.

wtf is that supposed to mean?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. Good night - I hope you can sleep after this debacle you started
I, for one, am tired of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #97
100. Which begs the question: WTF are you talking about?
What 'point' did you answer?



I know you are just here causing trouble.

wtf is that supposed to mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. He's saying he would have been nicer to the Europeans so they
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 10:30 PM by Classical_Liberal
would have agreed with the war. Whatever! He is a prowar candidate. We would be in Iraq now. His advisors all supported the war. His foriegn policy isn't different from Bush.

Back when DU had asskickers rather than Kerrybots 90% of us knew it was blank check for Bush and Kerry did too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Why not accept that he is saying what he actually is saying?

Why make up a position for Kerry that you don't like, and then pretend that it's his position?


Why not comment on what Kerry's real position is, even if it means you have to admit you agree with him?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I thought the IWR was a blank check then
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 10:47 PM by Classical_Liberal
I don't agree with his position that we should try to make Iraq work or that Iraq is workable. I don't agree with his position on Israel. He is accepting the settlements which means that he is not going to be an international leader of the stature of Carter, and Clinton. His position on Hugo Chavez is just obtuse. As an international leader he will be more of a midget then Bush only with less conviction. If you don't like my opinion don't fish for it.

I didn't make anything up. His advisors are supporters of the war and it reflects itself everyday with new neocon inspired policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. You didn't explain why you are falsifying Kerry's positions.
What I asked was, why make up a position for Kerry that you don't like, and then pretend that it's his position?


Why not comment on what Kerry's real position is, even if it means you have to admit you agree with him?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. He is objectively prowar
All his actions result in the same policies as Bush. I am not making this up at all. I look at actions not words. I take it for granted politicians are liars, and Kerry's actions tell me he is not honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. OK, so you are telling us that Kerry is a liar
I just wanted to be clear about what side of the question you were on.


Thank you for clearing it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Yes
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Well I disagree. I don't think Kerry is a liar.
I guess on this one, you agree with the Republican party, and I agree with the Democratic party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. Bush is indeed more sincere about his motives than Kerry
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 11:48 PM by Classical_Liberal
saying so doesn't make me a republican. Again if you don't want my opinion don't ask for it. You aparently agreed with the republicans that there was good reason to vote for IWR. I don't think you want to go there. I am not in agreement with the republicans or democrats on the war, since they are fundamentally the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. I never said
Edited on Sun Jul-11-04 11:53 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
you were a Republican. I merely pointed out that you share the Republican viewpoint that John Kerry is a liar, and I share the Democratic viewpoint that he is not.

Again if you don't want my opinion don't ask for it.

I don't know where you got that idea. I encourage you to share your opinions, no matter how out of the mainstream of Democratic opinion (or in) they happen to be.

For instance, now you've stated that you believe Bush is more sincere than Kerry. I say, bravo to you for your candor and courage in praising Bush on DU. Thumbs up for free speech.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. You are making one up...
why can't Classical_Liberal do the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. I am quoting a CBS News article.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/07/60minutes/main627965.shtml

Your statement "You are making one up..." is false.

Either is was unintentional, and a mistake, or it was intentional, and a lie.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
58. Seems pretty clear to me...
He voted for the war, and he is saying that "...the way the president went to war was wrong," and given that he has said they should stick it out in Iraq (albeit with the help of other nations - "No thanks, we don't want to be part of the quagmire"), and has not said anything about bringing the troops home, I'd say, "Yep. He's for the war."

There are still all those corporate interests and oil to grab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Your misunderstanding is profound.
You start out with a false premise: He voted for the war so that explains why all your conclusions are so wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #62
76. when a man votes for something, it- you know, never mind. i'm tired.
i'm gonna go chill in the lounge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #76
89. Uttering a half-sentence is not a way of making a coherent point.

It's usually good for a dishonest smear though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #89
93. ok, here' s a coherent point.
kerry has been in the senate for about 20 years. he's senior enough to know all the bullshit about the way that legislation can be misused (this vote was post-patriot act, btw) and he is well connected enough that he should be able to have known about W's passion, longing, nay- his LUST for war. to vote for any resolution that depends on UN action, when the UN has proved they cant stick up for themselves...is foolish, and i think he made a mistake.

can we agree to disagree, or what.

and i still think that starting this thread was divisive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #93
102. If your point is that
Kerry should have voted against the IWR, I agree with you.

However, I still believe that Kerry is telling the truth when he says he is against the war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
61. Perhaps Kerry is telling the truth that he is against the war.
Since he actually saw combat, I'm willing to believe that he is against war in general. No matter what, I am still going to vote for Kerry in November. All this nitpicking on Kerry in the last few days is getting on my nerves. He wasn't my choice from the beginning, but he is our ONLY hope to defeat Bush... unless some unforeseen thing happens.

Actually, I'd vote for a one-eyed, one-horn, LYING purple people-eater before I would vote for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flutter by Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
67. Am I the only one who noticed...
...that there was a lot of 'cut-away' and editing in this interview? How can you know that the conversation wasn't edited to portray a certain spin? I don't trust the media.

And I didn't vote in the poll. It's counter-productive. I can just hear Rush now - 47% of Democrats think Kerry is a liar. Give me a break!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
68. i say old boy, jolly good dissension you've sown amongst the ranks.
let's all just get along?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
78. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #78
81. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. i've had enough for tonight. i wish he'd responded to the good doc dean
but i guess he got bored. interesting, he got to 300+ posts.

says a lot, doesnt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
94. Totally misleading poll. Kerry didn't say either.
He said his vote for giving the president the authority to go to war was right. He said Bush screwed up and abused the authority. Kerry is for the country. He would have taken us to war if it had proven necessary. He would have kept us out of war had it proven unnecessary.

He says he wouldn't have taken us to war when the president did and in the way he did it. Kerry is telling us Bush made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #94
95. Thanks for clarifying for us.
Apparently we have all fallen into the voodoo spell of this twit - lol - I must be tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taxidriver Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #95
99. heh heh, i was gonna leave, but i just went to the lounge.
i tried to see if we could agree to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #94
101. What you are saying is not true.
You are making false, unsupported, undocumented assertions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #94
103. Then here's a simple answer
The next time he's asked "Do you think the invasion ofIraq was right?" all he has to say is "Under those circumstances, NO."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #103
109. And that's been Kerry's position all along.
If you look at his speech prior to casting the IWR vote, Oct. 2002: http://www.independentsforkerry.org/uploads/media/kerry-iraq.html
His foreign policy speech in Feb. 2003: http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/issues/kerr012303spfp.html
His Hardball interview from Oct. 2003: http://www.csgv.org/document.cfm?documentID=139
Or 60 Minutes from last night, it's all the exact, same, consistent position.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Albert Einstein Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
98. I saw Kerry shortly before the war started.
He said he was against it then and he wasn't speaking for the camera. He was very sincere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
105. Thank you, feanorcurofinwe. This is a truly wonderful post.
Excellent, and real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
106. yeah, he was holding up that fake vial like powell, he approved of
lifting a thesis off the internet and altering it to suit the case for war. Is this a BS poll or what? Cheney had nothing to do with it. Rummy is honest as the and pure as the driven snow.

Yeah, bush is innocent. Does that statement fill your needs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #106
108. Your post is not true.
Is it?

"yeah, he was holding up that fake vial like powell"

You made that up didn't you?


What are you making false and misleading statements about Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
107. Well then John, if you're against the war
Where is you timetable for getting us out of Iraq? Where is the plan for bringing the troops home ASAP?

This is, I feel, more election year politics. On the one hand, Kerry is saying he is against the war, yet on the other hand, Kerry is promising to put more troops into the meatgrinder and his only timetable for getting us out of Iraq is some vague promise of sometime before his first term ends.

The majority of people have soured on the war, so this would be the perfect time to contrast himself against Bush and come out solidly against the war. I'm not even asking for an apology for his IWR stupidity. Just give us a firm timetable on when he will have us out of Iraq, and knock it off with the promises of throwing more troops into the fray.

But he will not, possibly cannot, do this. He is talking a good anti-war game, but his actions belie his words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC