Another terrorist attack

[Nadienne]

would be proof that Bush is incompetent and unable to protect this country, despite the freedoms he has taken away in the interest of National Security.

[tom_paine]

1. Actually, I think it would be a testament to their ability to carry out

Covert Ops through their surrogates.

More Saudi Intelligence types like Atta?

[Granite]

2. I'll take it one step further

The non-stop THREATS of attack, including those used to justify cancelling U.S. elections are proof that Bush's policies haven't worked. Assuming these threats are real (and not manufactured for political purposes), the fact that al Qaeda can yield as much power as they do over the American psyche continues to prove that Bush has failed in his efforts to make the country safer, right? I mean, if we are truly safer today now that the Taliban and Saddam are both out of power, why are we considering plans to cancel elections and giving warnings that OBL is in the operational phase of an imminent attack?

The reality is, Bush's policies have made us LESS SAFE, and we all know it. The problem is that not enough others know what we do.

[Walt Starr]

3. And this flap about postponing elections is a blatant attempt to usurp

Congressional and State authority!