Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Journal... Abstinence.. the "retroactive virginity"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:41 AM
Original message
Washington Journal... Abstinence.. the "retroactive virginity"
Edited on Tue Jul-13-04 07:21 AM by SoCalDem
That is MY take on what most of the freeps who are calling in , are talking about.,.

One lady just called in supporting abstinence.. She's 29 and had a baby at 14.. :eyes:.. Too bad she did not learn that lesson earlier , eh??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
luaneryder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gawd, the lady caller is the perfect
example of how abstinence does NOT work. She calls for it now LOL. Hypocrites!! Hello freepers: virginity is a one time deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like she was a slow, slow learner, and only learned
the hard way. I'm just wondering how long it took her to learn. My guess is that she didn't discover abstinence until she was in her mid 20s with a baby or two clinging to her and her looks were starting to show the stress.

It's sad but true that prospects for women start to dry up in the late 20s, only to turn into the Gobi desert on that 50th birthday.

Absinence is easy for somebody who is 28 and an unmarried mother. Abstinence is not easy for kids, as it seems it was impossible for her. The sooner the policy makers in this country realize eighteen is a far cry from thirty, the sooner we'll have appropriate sex education in this country and can begin to reduce unwanted pregnancy, abortion and the transmission of STDs.

Until we drop this asininie and unworkable idea of forcing teenagers and young adults into an abstinent lifestyle (which 2000 years of sex phobic Christianity never achieved), the sooner we can start focusing on real problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly.. People between 13 and 25 are interested in sex
nature intended it that way.. To deny it, is S T U P I D ... knowledge is the only answer..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirty Hippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. My daughter said
that virtually everyone in her high school was having sex by the time they became juniors or seniors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. About 100 years ago, girls were married by age 15 or 16
In the "cosmic sense" of things, sex is not unusual for teens.. It's only been "recently" that an extended adolescence has been the fashion..

We try to keep our children "juvenile" for longer than most countries, even now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC