Rather than "Which would rather barbecue with" maybe the

[mondo joe]

Rather than "Which would rather barbecue with" maybe the pollsters should ask "Which would you rather have your back in a war, John Kerry or GW Bush".

But all those polls seem to be about important presidential jobs like babysitting and barbecuing, rather than silly things like wars and budgets.

[calico1]

1. I would ask:

Who would you rather have in a foxhole with you? How many people do you think would pick Bush? LOL.

[fob]

6. I think a lot of people would pick shrub* because they know if they

are in a foxhole with him, then they are most likely in the Dallas suburbs at a bar called The Foxhole, however if they pick Kerry, the location moves to the frontlines with bullets whizzing overhead. And everyone of em that would vote that way is a giant cheneystick!

[Morning Dew]

2. Who would you trust

to pick up the eight ball and a twelve pack and get them back to you untouched.

[SidDithers]

3. Who would you rather have do your taxes? nt

Sid

[ClassWarrior]

4. Who can provide you with the means to afford throwing a b.y. bbq?

n/t

[kentuck]

5. A stupid, non-presidential question ?

who would yourather be in a foxhole with? If we are at "war", I would think that a more important question than a barbecue?

[Lisa]

7. I wouldn't trust Bush around an open flame!

He'd either burn himself, tip the apparatus over (probably on my foot), or end up setting fire to the neighbor's cedar fence.

[Solly Mack]

8. Guess I'm strange. I neither want to BBQ nor drink beer w/ a President

and don't consider such things important when casting a vote.