CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 06:33 PM
Original message |
On Hardball: Rangel vs Watts reference Bush and the NAACP |
|
on now...........
that is, Charlie Rangel and J.C. Watts
|
andino
(668 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. No offense to anyone but |
|
I hate JC Watts. He's a goober. The guy should stick to football because he sucks as a politician.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. JC Watts, another of the |
AspenRose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-15-04 06:38 PM by DesertedRose
Can we get a play by play or summary please? (I don't have cable)
This ought to be good. Rangel would clean his clock.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Republican's are good at filibustering an interview. J.C. has his talking |
|
points and chooses to go down his scripted list until the segment clock runs out.
|
Zen
(672 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yeah, Watts just needs a good punch in the face to stop him from |
|
talking so damn much - I'm not even watching but I know his talking-points robotic style.
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Whew! J.C. Was Saved by the Bell on the Sudan Question |
|
Andrea: (After RANGEL talks about the NAACP issue) "Let's switch gears. Congressman RANGEL just got arrested protesting about the Sudan. (Cong.) WATTS, are the U.S. and the U.N. doing enough ..."
J.C. was deer-in-the-headlights, said he wanted to respond to my hero Charlie first, then ran the clock out. When Andrea said, "We're out of time. We'll have to come back to the Sudan question some other time," J.C. smiled BIG and said, "GOOD!" ("Good," meaning "WHEW!")
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |