I found this year old story while looking up stuff on Bush's "darn good intelligence" quote
look at how they lied their asses off WRT the language included in both the October, 02 speech AND the SOTU, regarding Iraq's attempts to purchase fissionable material
Since last Monday, the administration has offered changing explanations for that statement. At first, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said the statement was simply wrong because it "was based and predicated on the yellowcake from Niger."
On Friday, Bush and top aides said the CIA approved the inclusion of those words, and CIA Director George J. Tenet took responsibility. Yet Bush aides have argued in recent days that the statement may, in fact, prove to be correct. Officials said Sunday the British had sources other than the forged documents, but they have declined to reveal them.
Yesterday Bush defended the charge as he fielded questions after a meeting in the Oval Office with U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan. "I think the intelligence I get is darn good intelligence," he said. "And the speeches I have given were backed by good intelligence. And I am absolutely convinced today, like I was convinced when I gave the speeches, that Saddam Hussein developed a program of weapons of mass destruction, and that our country made the right decision."
The president again noted that his speech was approved by the CIA and suggested that any doubts about the charge came after the speech. "The thing that's important to realize is that we're constantly gathering data," he said. "Subsequent to the speech, the CIA had some doubts. But when they talked about the speech and when they looked at the speech, it was cleared. Otherwise, I wouldn't have put it in the speech." this is almost a seminal article, in that it contains just about all one needs to put the lie to the idea that Iraq had ANY chance of getting yellowcake from Niger
it includes quotes from one of the other people who went to Niger, Gen. Fulford, who makes it VERY CLEAR what the deal was. He passed it on to Gen. Meyers, who, of course, can't remember ever seeing it.
it ALSO includes the very wimpy charge that events "appear to contradict" dumbo's assertion that the war STARTED because Saddam refused to let the inspectors back in; he's repeated this charge at least once, maybe twice since he said it.
there's a lot more in there, which is ALL very damaging to the junta, and should provide lots of material for those seeking to refute the next chapter in the wingnut attempt to rewrite history.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A56336-2003Jul14¬Found=true