Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: The Arabian Candidate --- Allegory to Bush* and Manchurian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:02 AM
Original message
Krugman: The Arabian Candidate --- Allegory to Bush* and Manchurian
candidate!
Excellent...

In the original version of "The Manchurian Candidate," Senator John Iselin, whom Chinese agents are plotting to put in the White House, is a right-wing demagogue modeled on Senator Joseph McCarthy. As Roger Ebert wrote, the plan is to "use anticommunist hysteria as a cover for a communist takeover."

snip

So let's imagine an update - not the remake with Denzel Washington, which I haven't seen, but my own version. This time the enemies would be Islamic fanatics, who install as their puppet president a demagogue who poses as the nation's defender against terrorist evildoers.

snip..

O.K., end of conceit. President Bush isn't actually an Al Qaeda mole, with Dick Cheney his controller. Mr. Bush's "war on terror" has, however, played with eerie perfection into Osama bin Laden's hands - while Mr. Bush's supporters, impressed by his tough talk, see him as America's champion against the evildoers.

Last week, Republican officials in Kentucky applauded bumper stickers distributed at G.O.P. offices that read, "Kerry is bin Laden's man/Bush is mine." Administration officials haven't gone that far, but when Tom Ridge offered a specifics-free warning about a terrorist attack timed to "disrupt our democratic process," many people thought he was implying that Al Qaeda wants George Bush to lose. In reality, all infidels probably look alike to the terrorists, but if they do have a preference, nothing in Mr. Bush's record would make them unhappy at the prospect of four more years.

worth reading the whole thing! link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/20/opinion/20krug.html?hp=&pagewanted=print&position=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Krugman writes another terrific column!!!
He is wonderful; I sent him a fan letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush is The ManChimpian Candidate
Many people on DU have noted how the current ManChimp in office has changed over the last few years. In Fahrenheit 911, we see a younger George Bush with the ability to speak, if not with great eloguence, at least with rapid speech, without constantly changing subject and verb mid-sentence, without staring into space for several minutes as though in a drug-induced stupor, and without interrupting himself with a string of mmmmmms, ahhhhhhs, or unhhhhhs. The current pResident ManChimp in the White House on occasion seems to be under the influence of powerful psychotropic drugs or mind-control. Maybe it's just the effect of prolonged drug and alcohol abuse.

But could George Bush actually be THE MANCHIMPIAN CANDIDATE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. The most CHILLLING article I've ever read by Krugman
This plus Craig Unger's book "House of Bush / House of Saud" could really make you start thinking...

Actually the main feeling I got while watching F9/11 was this eerie idea that somehow Bush was a puppet for Saudi Arabia. Hell, they've paid him almost 2 billion dollars over the years, and his such a kiss-ass, it really seems like he's taking orders from them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Whatever, Krugman is too forthright for this administration. Hersh,
Krugman, and a few others with impeccable credentials must watch their backs. See what they are doing to Wilson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's his most powerful ever.
He NAILED it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC