Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Appeals Court Questions Bush's Appointment"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 11:43 AM
Original message
"Appeals Court Questions Bush's Appointment"
ATLANTA (AP) - A federal appeals court is asking the Bush administration to defend the president's appointment of a judge to its ranks while the U.S. Senate was out of session.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Atlanta, asked the Justice Department on Monday to intervene in a case contesting the appointment of former Alabama attorney general William Pryor to that court.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and others are backing a challenge asking the court to rule that the appointment was unconstitutional.

Bush appointed Pryor in February during a one-week recess of the Senate, which must confirm judicial nominees. The Constitution gives the president the right to appoint judges directly when Congress is not in session.

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20040720/D83U9NF00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the constitution gives the president the right
then what is this scrap really all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Congress was not officially recessed
So, I guess it boils down to what defines "recess" for the purposes of a Recess Appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think a week's vacation constitutes grounds for a recess appt.
Otherwise, Presidents would never submit a judicial candidate for confirmation by the Senate... they'd just wait until the Senate took a day off.

Inertia would make it difficult to justify withdrawal of the recess appointee from the bench.

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC