Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: He's in a heap of trouble

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:53 AM
Original message
Bush: He's in a heap of trouble
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 10:05 AM by bigtree
"Oh, I know, you're probably here thinking I'm going to spend most of the time attacking my opponent," Bush said in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. "I've got too much good to talk about."
.
The Bush campaign is shifting gears at a time when some Republicans have grown increasingly worried about Bush's prospects and concerned that the hard-edged and expensive campaign he waged over the past six months had inflicted less damage than many had hoped. Bush's job-approval ratings, historically a reliable indicator of incumbent's prospects for re-election, remain below 50 percent, a level that even some Republicans said put him in a danger zone. And the next few days could prove difficult for him. On Thursday, the commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks is to release its final report, criticizing government efforts to prevent the attacks, and Kerry is about to enjoy a week of presumably adulatory coverage of his nominating convention in Boston.
.
"He's in a heap of trouble," Clyde Wilcox, a government professor at Georgetown University, said of Bush. "I don't think the economy is really surging enough to put him back, and the public has a negative view about Iraq. He is a very spirited campaigner and he's got an amazing knack at connecting with the American people and persuading them that he's like them. But there are fewer and fewer people who remain to be persuaded." Tony Fabrizio, a Republican pollster said: "Job approval rating has always been one of the greatest correlations in a presidential race. All the job approval ratings I've seen -his disapproval in the mid 40s. I would say that's problematic."

http://www.iht.com/articles/530403.html
________________________________________

Since 2001, the AFL-CIO BushWatch has tracked the anti-worker actions supported, proposed and taken by the Bush administration.
http://www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/bushwatch/

This administration, in catering to industries that put America's health and natural heritage at risk, threatens to do more damage to our environmental protections than any other in U.S. history. Here is NRDC's account of what the Bush administration has done and is doing on environmental matters. < Last Update: 7.16.2004 >
http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/
http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/#

Army Corps of Engineers ordered to protect West Virginia streams from mining waste (07/09/04)

EPA loses Yucca Mountain court case (07/09/04)

Missouri River restoration battle takes bad turn for wildlife (06/22/04)

Interior Department retains protection for desert plant (06/03/04)

Bush administration slashes funding for global warming research (06/03/04)

Rewriting the Rules: An NRDC Report http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/rollbacks/rollbacksinx.asp

Black Fridays: Sneaking Bad Environmental News Under the Radar http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/fridays.asp

On the Airwaves: Robert Redford, Edward James Olmos http://www.nrdc.org/stateaction

NRDC Victories in the Courts http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/courtwins.asp

RFK Jr. on the Bush Record http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story?id=5939345

View the Bush Record in chronological order.
2004 http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/2004.asp
2003 http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/2003.asp
2002 http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/2002.asp
2001 http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/2001.asp
_________________________________________________

George W. Bush - 152 executions while governor of Texas.
http://www.bushkills.com/
__________________________________________________

Caught on Film: The Bush Credibility Gap. The Photographic History of the Bush Administration Putting Its Mouth Where Its Money Isn’t. The Photographic History of the Bush Administration Putting Its Mouth Where Its Money Isn’t
http://www.house.gov/appropriations_democrats/caughtonfilm.htm
_________________________________________________

The Wage Slave Journal: George W. Bush Scorecard of Evil
http://www.wage-slave.org/scorecard.html
_________________________________________________

DNC: Supreme Court Action Center
... The Bush Record. President Bush has already tried to pack the federal courts with extremist right-wing ideologues
http://www.democrats.org/scotus/bushrecord.html
____________________________________________________

Bush's Record on Corporate Ethics
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0710-01.htm
__________________________________________________

Fight for the Future - The Bush Record Index
http://www.fightforthefuture.org/bushrecord
__________________________________________________

From his first days in office, President George W. Bush has assailed the interests of workers and their families. The result is a long and sobering record of Bush administration attacks on workers’ jobs, health, safety, civil rights and more.

National Labor Relations Board says federal law doesn’t apply to graduate employees

The Republican majority on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on July 13 ruled graduate assistants are students, not employees, and therefore not entitled to the protections of federal labor law. The Bush NLRB—the federal agency that oversees union elections and determines how labor laws are applied—sided with administrators at Brown University in Providence, R.I., who fought efforts by graduate employees to form a union with the UAW. The ruling overturns a 2000 decision giving graduate employees at New York University the right to a union voice on the job. The NLRB has asked the agency’s regional directors to examine six pending cases involving graduate employees in light of the decision.

Threatened to fire Medicare official for telling the truth

A new investigation confirmed a former top Bush administration official threatened to fire Medicare’s chief actuary if he revealed to Congress that the administration’s cost estimates for the Medicare prescription drug law were more than $100 billion higher than the figure provided to lawmakers. In a report released July 6, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) said Thomas Scully, President George W. Bush’s former top Medicare administrator who now lobbies for drug companies, threatened to fire actuary Richard Foster. The report confirms news accounts from March detailing the Bush administration’s successful efforts to hide the true costs of Bush’s Medicare prescription drug bill from members of Congress as they prepared to vote on it. More than a dozen Republican lawmakers said they would not vote for the bill if it cost more than $400 billion over 10 years. The Bush administration touted a cost estimate of $395 billion from the Congressional Budget Office—though Foster pegged the cost at more than $500 billion. Scully refused to disclose that figure to members of Congress though repeatedly pressed by congressional staff, according to the new report. Congress narrowly passed the Medicare bill in November 2003. It was not until January 2004 that the Bush administration acknowledged the bill would cost at least $534 billion.

Though the new report did not accuse Scully of breaking any laws, the OIG said Scully might be subject to disciplinary action if he still worked for the government. He does not. After the Medicare drug law passed, Scully got a new job as a lobbyist for several pharmaceutical companies and other health care interests.

Supports bill that would increase student loan debt

The Bush administration supports legislation that could force college graduates to pay nearly $5,500 more in interest on their student loans. Currently, the federal government helps students pay for college by allowing them to consolidate their loans with a low fixed interest rate, enabling them to save thousands of dollars over the life of the loan. A bill by Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio) would eliminate graduates’ ability to consolidate their loans with a low fixed interest rate and instead allow the interest rate to be variable. The move would benefit banks and lenders. The Congressional Research Service found the change could cost $5,484 in interest over the life of a 15-year, $17,000 loan. “Instead of yet another raid on the pocketbooks of students and their families, Congress should be investing federal resources to make college affordable,” says Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), the top-ranking Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee.

Bush’s National Labor Relations Board seeks to restrict workers’ rights

The Bush administration’s National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on June 7, 2004, announced it will review the legality of rules regarding majority verification and neutrality procedures to form unions. Often called “card-check recognition,” the process enables workers to more fairly and rapidly indicate whether they want a union and is an alternative to the lengthy NLRB election process, which allows employers to block workers’ free choice. The three-member board majority, Republicans appointed by President George W. Bush, agreed to hear arguments by the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, a national anti-union group, saying it was time to take a new look at recognition agreements. The board’s two dissenting members, both Democrats, wrote that reviewing card-check procedures serves no purpose except to undermine well-settled policy in favor of voluntary recognition agreements.

Proposes eliminating training program for Latino farm workers

The Bush administration has proposed eliminating the National Farmworker Jobs Program (NFJP), which Congress passed last year with strong bipartisan support. The NFJP, which the U.S. Department of Labor recognized earlier this year as one of its top training program, assists farm workers who are American citizens or are immigrants in this country on an agricultural work visa. NFJP provides job training and other assistance to improve the working and living conditions of the predominately Latino farm laborers, nearly all of whom live well below the federal poverty line. Cutting the program would result in lost job opportunities and an uncertain future for nearly 25,000 families and create a less healthy and less reliable workforce for farmers and agribusinesses, according to the Association of Farmworker Opportunity Programs (AFOP), an advocacy group for agricultural workers.

Plans to cut domestic programs in 2006 if re-elected

President George W. Bush’s budget office has put federal agencies on notice that $2.3 billion is likely to be cut from Bush’s domestic budget if he is re-elected, according to a May 27 report in The Washington Post. The Office of Management and Budget directive would entail spending cuts for virtually all agencies in charge of domestic programs, including many Bush has promoted while campaigning, such as education; homeland security; a nutrition program for women, infants and children; Head Start; veterans programs; job-training; medical research; and science programs. “The Bush administration, unfortunately, is more committed to unwise, unaffordable tax cuts than providing adequate funding for education, healthcare, job training and other critically important programs that make our nation and its citizens stronger,” AFT Secretary-Treasurer Edward J. McElroy said.

Refuses to meet with the G-8 union leaders

President George W. Bush refused to meet with top union leaders of the world’s major industrial nations, known as the G-8, when they meet in Washington, D.C., June 2–3. Bush is the first U.S. president and first head of state of any nation to refuse such a meeting since the summits began in 1977. The labor leaders are meeting to finalize the trade union statement for G-8 leaders meeting in Sea Island, Ga., June 8–10. Previous U.S. presidents who hosted the summit—Ronald Reagan, George H. Bush and Bill Clinton—met with the labor leaders. The G-8 includes the elected leaders of Canada, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States and representatives from the European Union.

Fails to fund port security

Although Congress in 2002 enacted a major port security law in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has failed to adequately fund the program. The U.S. Coast Guard estimates the nation needs $1.1 billion a year to safeguard U.S. ports, but President George W. Bush’s fiscal year 2005 budget proposes only $46 million. In 2002, Bush vetoed $39 million for ship container security. Some 30 percent of port security grants have gone to big oil and chemical companies while ports and their workers are left without the security protections they need, according to Rep. Martin Sabo (D-Minn.). An April 28 explosion inside a shipping container at the Port of Los Angeles should serve as a “wake-up call” for the administration and the port industry to address port security threats, said Edward Wytkind, president of the AFL-CIO Transportation Trades Department. The explosion occurred inside a container that was brought into the port without any support documents and was never inspected, Wytkind said.

Reverses position on HMO accountability and fights to block patients’ rights

During the 2000 presidential campaign, then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush touted his support for his state’s Patients’ Bill of Rights law—which includes patients’ rights under some circumstances to sue managed-care companies for wrongfully refusing to cover needed medical treatment. “If I’m the president…people will be able to take their HMO insurance company to court,” Bush said during a presidential debate. “That’s what I’ve done in Texas and that’s the kind of leadership style I’ll bring to Washington.” (In fact, according to The Washington Post, Bush initially vetoed the Texas law then allowed it to become law without his signature.) As president, Bush is fighting the Texas law and similar laws in nine other states. On March 23, Bush’s Justice Department asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block patients’ legal challenges under the Texas law. In two related cases, the insurance industry argued that states have no power to adopt laws giving patients who are denied needed care the right to sue insurance companies and HMOs. On June 21, 2004, industry attorneys and Bush’s solicitor general succeeded in their arguments that the Supreme Court strike down the state laws.

Makes misleading claims about health of Social Security, Medicare

The Social Security and Medicare trustees—dominated by Bush administration officials—released their annual reports March 23. By calculating Social Security and Medicare costs into infinity, the trustees’ reports provided results that are “highly misleading,” according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The reports predict that over an “infinite horizon,” Social Security and Medicare face a multitrillion dollar shortfall. Yet, experts say predictions into infinity are especially uncertain. With such projections, the trustees are able to show large shortfalls that likely will mislead the public into believing the vital retirement programs are on the brink of disaster and need to be radically restructured. In fact, the Social Security trustees’ report shows the program is fully funded through 2042 and will have enough money to cover 73 percent of benefits after that time, even without changes to strengthen the system.

Threatened to fire Medicare official for telling the truth

According to The Washington Post and several other news reports, the Bush administration threatened to fire Medicare’s chief actuary if he revealed to Congress that the administration’s own cost estimates for the Medicare prescription drug legislation were more than $100 billion higher than the figure provided Congress. Congress narrowly passed the Medicare drug bill in November based on the lower cost estimate, which swayed several wavering lawmakers concerned about the bill’s cost. According to news reports, several Bush administration estimates pegged the cost of the bill at more than $500 billion, but lawmakers were told the cost was $395 billion, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. In June 2003, five months before Congress approved the bill, then-Medicare Director Thomas A. Scully told Richard S. Foster, the chief actuary of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, that Foster would be fired if he revealed the administration’s estimates to Congress. (Before his appointment to head Medicare, Scully was a health-industry lobbyist, and after the Medicare drug bill passed Congress, he joined a law firm that represents health insurers and hospitals.) Before the bill passed the House by just five votes in November, more than a dozen Republican members threatened to vote against it if the cost were greater than $400 billion. In January 2004, the Bush administration admitted the drug bill would cost at least $534 billion.

The final bill creates a huge gap in coverage for beneficiaries, will cost many seniors more in premiums and other fees, forbids the government from negotiating lower prices from the pharmaceutical industry, threatens employer-provided coverage for millions of retirees and moves Medicare toward privatization.

Seeks to exempt industrial laundries from EPA requirements

Every year, businesses in the United States produce about 3.8 billion contaminated shop towels filled with toxic or hazardous chemicals, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Manufacturers and printers use these towels to clean machinery and pick up chemical spills. The towels often are soaked in toxic solvents and most are washed in industrial laundries where the hazardous chemicals and wastewater are discharged to public sewers. Now the Bush administration’s EPA has proposed exempting these industrial laundries from federal hazardous and solid waste requirements for “industrial wipes.” If approved, the exemption would allow such companies as Cintas, the largest industrial launderer in North America, to profit from policies that endanger workers and the environment. Production workers and drivers have reported illnesses from exposure to towels soaked in solvents linked to cancer and reproductive disorders, according to UNITE, which, along with the Teamsters, testified against the proposed regulations at a March 9 congressional hearing.

Asks whether fast food jobs are manufacturing jobs

Faced with the relentless decline in good manufacturing jobs, the Bush administration’s Economic Report of the President opens the door to classifying fast food workers as manufacturing workers instead of service workers. In a special section titled “What is manufacturing?” the report asks, “When a fast food restaurant sells a hamburger, for example, is it providing a ‘service’ or is it combining inputs to ‘manufacture’ a product?” The report, presented Feb. 9 and signed by President George W. Bush, notes the current system of defining manufacturing jobs “is not straightforward.” According to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics’ “Occupational Handbook,” some 2.2 million food preparation and serving workers, plus another 421,000 counter attendants were at work in 2000—just a few million short of the 2.8 million manufacturing jobs lost since the Bush administration took office.

Calls teachers’ union ‘a terrorist organization’

President George W. Bush’s Secretary of Education Rod Paige on Feb. 23 called the National Education Association (NEA) a “terrorist organization.” Paige made his comment during a private meeting with the nation’s governors at the White House. “At a time when our nation faces the very real threat of terrorism, it is both unconscionable and irresponsible for any public figure, let alone a U.S. cabinet member, to undertake this kind of name-calling,” says AFT Secretary-Treasurer Edward McElroy. Members of the NEA—along with other educators and state legislators from the Republican and Democratic parties—have disagreed with the Bush administration’s failure to adequately fund the No Child Left Behind education reform act. The NEA and others laud the new law’s goals of raising standards for all students, testing to see if those standards are being met and providing extra help for students falling behind. But they note Bush is not giving school districts the resources they need to implement the law. In Utah, the majority of the state House recently considered dropping out of the No Child Left Behind effort and forfeiting federal education funding that comes with it. The lawmakers in the Republican-majority chamber voted to stick with the portions of the program that are federally funded, but bar school districts from using state and local funding to implement the act. Lawmakers in several other states are considering similar measures.

Circumvents Congress to appoint extremist judge

For the second time in recent months, President George W. Bush has bypassed the Senate to appoint an extremist judge to a federal court. On Feb. 20, the president made a recess appointment to avoid a Senate confirmation vote and placed ultraconservative William H. Pryor Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Pryor was unable twice to win Senate confirmation because of his extremist views on civil rights and the rights of workers, women and people with disabilities. As Alabama attorney general, he urged Congress to roll back provisions of the Voting Rights Act, which protects the right to vote for African Americans and other minorities. Pryor also challenged a key provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act and urged the U.S. Supreme Court to limit Congress’ right to establish uniform protections covering states in areas such as employment discrimination and environmental protections. Presidents are allowed to make recess appointments when Congress is not session, but legal observers say it is unusual for a president to use a recess appointment to seat an appellate court judge.

Altered report on racial and ethnic disparities in health care

The Bush administration’s Department of Health and Human Services altered a report to downplay findings about the differences in health care services the nation’s minorities receive. The original report said disparities in the U.S. health care system are pervasive and contribute to poorer health and higher rates of disease and disabilities among people of color, according to The New York Times. African Americans and Native Americans die younger than those in other racial or ethnic groups and, along with Hispanic Americans, are twice as likely to suffer from diabetes and serious complications. Instead, the final report begins, “The overall health of Americans has improved dramatically over the last century.” The altered report dropped several statements noting health care disparities, including “black children have much higher hospitalization rates for asthma than white children.” After congressional leaders and health care professionals criticized the report, and after the changes became public, the Bush administration said it would release the full, undoctored report. The revelation of the report’s change came just days after 60 prominent scientists, including 20 Nobel Prize winners, charged the Bush administration with misusing science to bolster its policies on the environment, health care and arms control.

Backs away from presidential report claiming 2.6 million new jobs in 2004

President Bush and administration officials acknowledged previous job growth claims are unrealistic as they backed off claims in the annual Economic Report of the President—signed by the president and delivered to Congress—that the U.S. economy will create 2.6 million new jobs in 2004. After the Feb. 9 report was criticized heavily, Bush, Treasury Secretary John Snow, Commerce Secretary Donald Evans and other White House officials backpedaled from the prediction that would mean some 217,000 new jobs will be created each month. In 2003, Bush said his economic policies would create some 1.8 million jobs. That prediction fell 1.6 million short. Since Bush took office, 2.9 million private-sector jobs have disappeared, including 2.8 million manufacturing jobs. Bush administration officials claimed the report was prepared by a group of White House economists and said Bush is not “a statistician” capable of checking the figures for accuracy. Bush has long noted he is the first president to hold an M.B.A. from Harvard University and has experience running businesses. Bush’s abandonment of his promise of 2.6 million new jobs came just days after White House economist N. Gregory Mankiw said, “Outsourcing American jobs overseas is good for the U.S. economy in the long run.” The Economic Report of the President makes the same argument.

Encourages outsourcing of U.S. jobs

The Bush administration is backing moves to outsource more U.S. jobs, according to its Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) annual report to Congress. “Outsourcing is just a new way of doing international trade,” said N. Gregory Mankiw, Bush’s CEA chairman. “More things are tradable than were tradable in the past. And that’s a good thing.” The report also predicts the economy will generate 3.9 million new jobs this year­­—a claim that would mean an average 325,000 new jobs each month. In spring 2003, the council said the president’s “Jobs and Growth” millionaire tax cut plan would create 306,000 jobs monthly starting in July. Yet by February 2004, the Bush administration was 1.8 million jobs short of that prediction. So far, the economy has lost 2.9 million private-sector jobs and 2.8 million manufacturing jobs since Bush took office. Meanwhile, the number of long-term jobless workers has been roughly 2 million for months, and for much of that time, long-term unemployment has been at its highest rate since 1983.

Fails to alert Postal Workers and public about ricin poison in U.S. mail

The Bush administration, in November 2003, failed to alert postal employees they may have handled a package of the deadly poison ricin. News reports revealed in February a letter was mailed to the White House from a Chattanooga, Tenn., post office. The letter was intercepted at an offsite White House mail sorting facility in the Washington, D.C., area and contained a powdery substance that tests indicated was ricin. The November incident came to light in February after it was discovered ricin had been sent to the office of U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.). Several Senate office buildings were then closed as a precaution while tests were conducted. According to The Washington Post, the Secret Service did not notify the FBI, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service or other federal agencies about the November ricin discovery until six days after the letter was intercepted. In 2001, after a series of anthrax mailings led to the deaths of five people, including two Postal Workers members, unions and other groups said the Bush administration was not forthcoming or timely with information about the attacks, the health risks and the cleanup of postal facilities.

Bush FY 2005 budget shortchanges America’s working families

The White House’s fiscal year (FY) 2005 budget proposal shortchanges America’s workers while showcasing the Bush administration’s top priority—cutting taxes for the nation’s super rich. Ignoring the plight of the nation’s millions of jobless workers, the Bush budget would create 5.6 million fewer jobs than the leading congressional proposal. The Bush budget proposes to cut worker safety training programs by $7 million compared with actual levels approved by Congress for FY 2004. It rejects the best vehicle for quick and significant job creation—investment in infrastructure—and requests only two-thirds of the transportation funding needed to upgrade roads, bridges and mass transit. The budget continues to underfund the No Child Left Behind Act so significantly that hundreds of thousands of children remain left behind—in classes that are too large, with teachers who can’t acquire training needed to upgrade their skills and with too few opportunities to participate in pre-kindergarten programs.

Spends $12.6 million in taxpayer dollars on misleading Medicare ads

The Bush administration’s $12.6 million nationwide television, radio, print and Internet advertising campaign—paid for with taxpayer dollars—promotes the new Medicare prescription drug law by making misleading claims, according to the nonprofit Center for American Progress. In addition, a media firm that creates political ads for President George W. Bush’s re-election campaign was awarded part of the taxpayer-funded contract. The ads do not mention the law prohibits Medicare from negotiating with the pharmaceutical industry for lower drug prices, does nothing to control prescription drug price inflation, gives insurers the authority to ration access to drugs funded by Medicare and drops coverage for seniors’ out-of-pocket expenses between $2,250 and $5,100.

Refuses to strengthen workplace reactive chemical explosion rules

The Bush administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has refused to strengthen the rules to prevent chemical explosions. Specifically, OSHA has failed to expand the Process Safety Management Standard to cover reactive chemicals. On Feb. 2, the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB)—with three of its four members Bush administration appointees—voted to declare OSHA’s response “Unacceptable” and urged OSHA to reconsider. During the past 20 years, reactive chemicals have caused explosions and other serious workplace accidents, claiming 167 lives and causing hundreds of millions of dollars in property damage, according to the CSB. The CSB, an independent federal agency that investigates chemical accidents, says reactive hazards exist when a single chemical or a mixture of chemicals has the potential to undergo a violent, uncontrolled reaction when improperly processed or combined. Such chemical reactions can release large quantities of heat, energy and gases, causing fires, explosions or toxic emissions. In 2002, CSB found reactive chemicals posed a “significant safety problem” and recommended OSHA broaden the rules governing chemical safety. Several unions joined in the call for a tougher standard. Instead, OSHA halted work on a new safety standard and announced in 2003 it would rely on voluntary cooperation from the chemical industry to address the problem.

Bush's budgets shortchanged working families and starved state budgets

Bush's fiscal year (FY) budgets won massive tax cuts for the very wealthy and corporations but rejected the best vehicle for quick and significant job creation—investment in infrastructure—and requests only two-thirds of the transportation funding needed to upgrade roads, bridges and mass transit. Bush also has failed to provide meaningful assistance to states, which are struggling with the worst fiscal crises since World War II. The states' fiscal crises are compounded by enormous unfunded federal mandates, which in FY 2004 cost the states $29 billion. As a result of the states' crises, 21 states were forced to lay off public employees between FY 2003 and FY 2004 to close or cut their state budget gaps.

Proposed temporary work, not citizenship, for immigrants

President Bush in January 2004 proposed a new temporary worker program that would match immigrant workers with a U.S. employer if no U.S. worker was available or willing to take a job. The program also would grant temporary worker status to currently working undocumented aliens but would require temporary workers to return to their home country after their work was finished. Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez (D-Texas), chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, described Bush’s plan as a "21st Century bracero program," a modern day equivalent of the 1940s bracero program that tore families apart and took away the earnings of laborers. "The president’s program would create a generation of second-class citizens who are baited to work for America with the false promise of ever being able to enjoy the benefits of citizenship."

Did nothing to address health care crisis

Explosive health care costs are pummeling working families. Millions are forced to forego necessary care because they cannot afford the cost. Between 2000 and 2003, the average cost of workers' premium contributions for family coverage rose nearly 50 percent. And American companies that are trying to do the right thing by their workers carry an enormous competitive burden. Since Bush took office, at least 4.9 million more people, including 126,000 more children, have become uninsured. The increase between 2001 and 2002 was the largest in 10 years. Nearly 75 million non-elderly Americans were uninsured for all or part of the two year period 2001-2002. Yet President Bush has put forward no plan and taken no effective steps to remedy this crisis. His prescription drug plan helped pharmaceutical companies more than patients and the Bush budget included a $46 billion taxpayer giveaway to the HMOs. Yet according to Families USA, his budget would reduce net funding for Medicaid by nearly $1 billion in fiscal year 2005 and by almost $16 billion between 2005 and 2014.

Allows private contractors to write nuclear weapons plants’ safety rules

The Bush administration recently proposed shielding private contractors that operate federal nuclear weapons plants and nuclear research facilities from government safety standards by allowing those private contractors to write their own safety rules. There are some two dozen U.S. Department of Energy contractor facilities exempt from workplace health and safety standards established and enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and instead subject to Energy Department oversight. During the Clinton administration, the Energy Department issued guidelines calling for contractors to establish health and safety programs that followed OSHA standards. In 2002, Congress passed bipartisan legislation requiring the Energy Department to develop enforceable nuclear facilities health and safety regulations offering the same safety standards as under OSHA. But the Bush administration’s Energy Department proposed rule calls for the contractors to develop their own safety and health standards and allows those contractors to decide on a case-by-case basis which rules should be followed. “The decision making will largely be in the hands of contractors to decide what protections are appropriate. It’s the fox guarding the hen house,” says Rep. Ted Strickland (D-Ohio). Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), who helped write the 2002 legislation, says the Bush administration plan “will likely decrease worker protection.”

Publishes so-called 'Labor Advocate'

The Bush administration’s Department of Labor launched a new publication, The Labor Advocate, intended to portray the department as an advocate and defender of workers and unions. Rather than act as labor advocate, the Bush administration in the past three years has gutted the collective bargaining rights of tens of thousands of federal workers, overturned and weakened workplace safety rules, sought to eliminate Fair Labor Standards Act overtime pay protections for up to 8 million workers, attacked prevailing wage laws by banning project labor agreements, opposed raising the federal minimum wage and supported efforts to silence workers’ political voice. The current issue of The Labor Advocate helps fill its five pages with six photographs of Labor Secretary Elaine Chao.

Downplays increase in coal mining fatalities, withdraws safety rules

The Bush administration’s 2003 report on mining fatalities reports that deaths in the nation’s mines fell by 18 percent, but the report downplays the fact coal mining deaths actually increased by 7 percent. The drop in mine fatalities occurred in metal and nonmetal mines, not in coal mines where the death rate increased, according to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). Coal miners were more likely to die on the job in 2003 than in 2002, MSHA’s figures reveal. In 2003, 29 coal miners were killed on the job, 27 died in 2002.

Strong-Arms Congress to Pass Voucher Program for District of Columbia Schools

In January 2004, President Bush maneuvered Congress to pass a voucher program for the District of Columbia schools. The legislation provides $14 million in public funds for 1,700 students to attend private schools—and $13 million for the 65,000 students in the city’s public schools. AFT leaders say the plan is intended to be a first step toward a national voucher program, which would siphon off funds for the public schools children of working families attend.

President Bush used a Jan. 16 recess appointment to place Charles Pickering on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The use of a recess appointment allowed Bush to evade a Senate confirmation vote on the controversial Pickering, who previously had failed to win Senate confirmation. He was opposed by a broad coalition that included unions and civil rights and women’s organizations because of his controversial and negative record on civil rights and other issues. Pickering has been severely criticized when, as a Mississippi judge, he intervened with the prosecution to get a reduced sentence for a convicted cross-burner. Pickering has criticized the “one-person, one-vote” principle and important provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Pickering has ruled against the vast majority of people bringing job bias suits in his court. The recess appointment allows him to serve until the current Congress adjourns later this year. Pickering’s nomination to the court was rejected by the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2002. He also was unable to overcome a Senate filibuster after Bush renominated him in 2003.

Funds groups promoting policies that harm public education—with education department money

The Bush administration’s Department of Education is helping to fund private groups that push for private school vouchers—all with federal taxpayer dollars. In its recent report Funding a Movement, People For the American Way (PFAW) found the Education Department gave grants totaling $75 million over the past three years to groups promoting such policies as voucher programs that weaken public schools—even though education leaders say Bush’s “No Child Left Behind” school reform law is chronically underfunded. “The mission of the Department of Education is to advance and promote public education,” says Ralph Neas President of PFAW, a civil liberties advocacy group. “Why is the department handing out $75 million to groups whose work undermines public education?”

Withdraws proposed rules on tuberculosis exposure

The Bush administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) decided not to go forward with protections against workplace exposure to tuberculosis Dec. 31. The move to establish a TB rule began in 1993, and OSHA proposed a TB rule in 1997 under the Clinton administration. The proposed exposure standard would have protected workers from tuberculosis by requiring airborne disease control measures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization recommend many of the same precautions to protect against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) that were included in the proposed tuberculosis rule.

Signs a Medicare prescription drug bill that threatens seniors’ health care

The Medicare prescription drug bill President George W. Bush signed Dec. 8, now revealed to cost $139 billion more than estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) in December, is a serious setback for many of the nation’s seniors. The new legislation could cost nearly 3 million retirees their employer-sponsored prescription drug benefits, according to estimates by the CBO. It prohibits Medicare from negotiating with the pharmaceutical industry for lower drug prices, as do other governmental agencies, such as the Department of Veterans Affairs, and does nothing to control prescription drug price inflation. The bill gives insurers the authority to ration access to drugs funded by Medicare and drops coverage for seniors’ out-of-pocket expenses between $2,250 and $5,100. Ultimately, the Medicare prescription drug bill Bush signed forces 32.5 million current Medicare beneficiaries to pay higher Medicare premiums and other Medicare costs.

Senate approves the “first step toward dismantling Medicare.”

Drops steel tariffs after only 20 months

After promising to impose tariffs for three years to protect the nation's steel industry from cheap, subsidized imports, President Bush on Dec. 4 rescinded the tariffs after only 20 months. The Bush White House claimed the tariffs had achieved their purpose, even though five major steel companies have declared bankruptcy since the tariffs began. The European Union and Japan had threatened to retaliate if the tariffs were not lifted. The Steelworkers condemned the decision as "clear evidence of capitulating to European blackmail and a sorry betrayal of American Steelworkers and steel communities." All together, 42 steel companies have gone bankrupt since 1998, putting more than 50,000 steelworkers out of jobs. In the same period, 17 of the companies have liquidated, wiping out the health care benefits of more than 208,000 retirees.

Cancels holidays for airport screeners

After eliminating 6,000 airport security screener jobs earlier this year, the Bush administration’s Transportation Security Administration (TSA) canceled all holiday leave for the remaining 48,000 screeners and will force many employees to work overtime during the Thanksgiving holidays. AFGE President John Gage says TSA’s mismanagement and “contractor waste and abuse” caused cost overruns and job cuts. As a result, says Gage, passengers must deal with “staffing shortages on a daily basis at many airports across the country, not just at peek holiday travel days.” Earlier this year, the Bush administration took away the collective bargaining rights of airport screeners.

Refuses to test OSHA workers for exposure to toxic metal beryllium

The Bush administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has refused to order blood tests for hundreds of its active and retired inspectors who may have been exposed to the toxic metal beryllium, one of the agency’s own regional administrators says in a complaint filed Oct. 9 with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel. Metal beryllium is believed to cause a fatal lung disease. The administrator, Dr. Adam Finkel, said as many as 500 OSHA workers may have been exposed to the metal during inspections of plants where it is used. Metal beryllium is used in many industrial and consumer products, including nuclear weapons and electronics. The nonprofit group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility filed the complaint on behalf of Finkel.

Adam Finkel’s statement

Nominates pro-privatization and party fund-raiser candidates to Amtrak board

Among the three members the Bush administration is nominating to serve on the Amtrak board of directors are an advocate of railroad privatization and a longtime fund-raiser for the Republican party, The Washington Post reported Sept. 12. Current Bush-backed efforts to privatize the nation’s railway system threaten the jobs of some 20,000 Amtrak workers. Louis S. Thompson, who retired this year from the World Bank, led the World Bank’s effort to privatize railroads in several countries. Floyd Hall is a longtime Republican party fund-raiser and former chairman of Kmart. The other nominee is former American Airlines CEO Robert Crandall.

Pressures EPA to omit mention of toxic substances in reports to public about safety of air quality at World Trade Center disaster site

In the days immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center, the Bush White House pressured the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to tone down reports about potential health hazards resulting from the buildings’ collapse, according to a report by the EPA’s inspector general. Thousands of emergency workers and construction workers toiled months at the site and residents and workers returned to their homes and jobs believing it was safe to do so. The report, issued Aug. 18, notes all EPA statements about the disaster and clean-up were required to be approved by the National Security Council via the White Houser Council on Environmental Quality. The report says EPA was pressured by the White House to omit cautions about hazards from air pollutants such as lead, cadmium, asbestos and smoke from fires, some of which burned for four months. A Sept. 18, 2001, EPA announcement reported the air around the World Trade Center was safe to breath, but the inspector general’s report says EPA “did not have sufficient data and analysis to make such a blanket statement.”

Slashes congressionally approved pay raise for federal workers

President George W. Bush on Aug. 27 announced his intention to limit next year's pay raises for federal workers to 2 percent, citing executive authority that allows the president to limit increases in times of “national emergency or serious economic conditions.” Since Bush took office, 3.2 million private-sector jobs have disappeared, unemployment hit its highest level in 10 years in June and the Bush administration has run up the highest federal deficit in history. Bush cut an automatic 2.7 percent raise for federal workers to a maximum of 2 percent—or as little as 1.5 percent—depending on locality. Two years ago, Bush restored cash bonus payments for 2,100 political appointees, eight years after the bonuses were eliminated because of abuse.

Charged Department of Health and Human Services for event expenses coinciding with campaign and fund-raising stops

The Bush administration has charged the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) more than $252,000 for HHS events attended by President George W. Bush that coincided with Bush’s attendance at same-day rallies and campaign fund-raisers and for Republican candidates across the country, according to a report from the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). Some $235,000 was charged to the Office of Administration for Children and Families, which runs the federal welfare program, Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF). The other HHS offices charged were the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Office of Public Health and Science. The GAO report shows Bush attended 15 HHS events, with each covered by a memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the White House and HHS regarding the amount Bush could charge to the department. As of May 2003, the Bush administration had collected $252,372 from HHS for eight of the events. According to the report, there is often a lag time between an event and the White House billing and the remaining seven events could cost HHS another $217,000. The events occurred between February 2002 and January 2003. In comparison, the GAO report found that former President Bill Clinton attended 37 HHS events between April 21, 1997, and Sept. 29, 2000, and HHS was charged just $101,000.

General Accounting Office

Backs cutting $270 million and 84,000 students from college grant program

The Bush administration’s Department of Education approved changes in the formula families use to determine if their college-bound students are eligible for financial assistance under the Federal Pell Grant Program. The changes, announced May 30, will rob 84,000 of aid and reduce financial help to hundreds of thousands of other students beginning in the 2004–2005 academic year, according to a memo from the Congressional Research Service. Education experts predict the impact of the changes will ripple into many state and university administered aid programs that base their eligibility formulas on the federal model, denying educational opportunity to even more students.

Doles out big bonuses to political appointees

Administration political appointees received $1.44 million in bonuses last year—even as the Bush administration sought to limit pay raises for federal workers, pushed for privatization of federal jobs and took away the bargaining rights of tens of thousands of federal employees. An Office of Personnel Management report lists 470 political appointees who got the bonuses—reviving a practice the Clinton administration halted eight years ago. At the same time, Bush originally proposed a 2.6 percent raise for federal employees for 2003—which Congress rejected and increased to 4.1 percent.

Threatens to veto labor appropriations bill if it includes ban on eliminating overtime

President George W. Bush on July 9 threatened to veto the fiscal year 2004 Labor and Health and Human Services and Education appropriations bill (H.R. 2660) if it includes an amendment that would halt Bush’s plan to change federal overtime rules. The Bush administration is pushing for changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act that could eliminate overtime pay for as many as 8 million workers, according to an Economic Policy Institute study. The proposed House amendment would prohibit the U.S. Department of Labor from using funds to implement regulations cutting overtime pay. It also would enable the Labor Department to implement a regulation allowing additional workers to qualify for overtime. The amendment to the appropriations bill, offered by Reps. George Miller (D-Calif.) and David Obey (D-Wis.), is similar to a stand-alone bill introduced July 9 by Miller and Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.).

No longer requires employers to keep track of such injuries as carpal tunnel syndrome

The Bush administration’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) June 30 revoked a 2001 requirement that employers track workplace ergonomic injuries such as carpal tunnel syndrome. The record-keeping rule, issued in 2001, required employers to check a box on standard workplace injury and illness logs if an injury was a musculoskeletal injury. The rule was designed to help employers, workers and OSHA identify and keep track of ergonomic injuries. Studies show nearly 2 million workers a year suffer from crippling musculoskeletal injuries. In 2001, Bush signed the repeal of the first nationwide ergonomics standard that would have required employers to control ergonomic hazards and given OSHA the power to enforce the standard. Bush claimed voluntary guidelines would better reduce ergonomic injuries.

Backs employer efforts to use taxpayer money for anti-union campaigns

The Bush administration’s National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is helping Big Business fight a California law that mandates accountability for the way state dollars are spent and requires state neutrality in worker organizing campaigns by banning the expenditure of state monies—pro-union or anti-union—in such campaigns. In 2000, the California legislature passed and Gov. Gray Davis (D) signed AB 1889, which prohibits employers from using taxpayer dollars to pay for employer-run campaigns to influence workers in their efforts to form or join a union. The law ensures the billions of dollars that flow to private employers each year through California grants and subsidies are used only for the purposes intended: public services and programs. In a 3-2 vote, the five-member NLRB voted May 29 to intervene in a federal court case brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, taking a position that protects employers who want to use taxpayer money to subsidize their anti-union campaigns and which denies states the right to control their own spending authority. The NLRB’s purported justification for its action is that federal labor law pre-empts the California statute. This position by the NLRB is directly contrary to that taken by the U.S. Department of Justice in two recent cases, which argued that federal labor law does not pre-empt Bush administration restrictions on the use of federal funds. The AFL-CIO and the California Labor Federation filed briefs in support of the California statute last April.

Buried Treasury report that predicts huge deficits and need for tax hike

The Bush administration, when it sent its proposed budget to Congress in February, omitted a U.S. Treasury Department report that predicted huge deficits far beyond the administration’s projections. The study also said tax increases were needed to close the astonishing $44 trillion deficit the study predicted. Yet, Bush’s budget instead called for a $726 billion tax cut and projected a deficit of just above $200 billion. A May 29 report in the Financial Times revealed the study was commissioned by former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, who resigned under pressure in December.

Establishes system to privatize 850,000 federal jobs

The Bush administration on May 29 unveiled the details of its plan to ultimately eliminate federal jobs and contract out the work to private companies. The changes are in the rules that govern contracting out—OMB Circular A-76—and give private companies the advantage over federal workers in the private-public competition process, federal workers’ unions say. In November, the Bush administration announced its goal of putting 850,000 federal jobs up for bid, including at least 15 percent, or 127,500 jobs, by October 2003. Administration officials reaffirmed that goal in their latest announcement. Last year, Bush demanded and won legislation allowing it eventually to unilaterally cancel the collective bargaining rights of 170,000 workers as part of the bill creating the Homeland Security Department. In January, the Bush administration took away the right of 60,000 airport screeners in the Transportation Security Administration to join a union.

The Bush administration halted efforts to establish workplace health rules protecting workers and patients from exposure to tuberculosis. On May 27, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) withdrew a proposed TB rule from its regulatory agenda. In 1997, OSHA published a proposed tuberculosis rule and in 1998 and 1999, held hearings and took comments. After the Bush administration came into office, OSHA reopened the comment period on the rule in 2002, but its newest move halts further action on the rule. The proposed rule would have established procedures to prevent and limit the spread of the infectious airborne disease. Health experts say the TB rule also would help guard against airborne diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). In 1997, OSHA estimated the new rule would help protect an estimated 5.3 million workers in more than 100,000 hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, correctional facilities, homeless shelters and other work settings with a significant risk of TB infections. It did not offer an estimate of how many millions of patients, residents, prisoners and others in those settings also would be protected.

Proposes to end federal low-income housing program for 2 million families

The Bush administration proposed legislation April 29 to end a federal, low-income housing assistance program that helps some 2 million families afford modest housing. The Section 8 housing voucher program provides low-income working families, the disabled, retirees and families on assistance with vouchers. Those vouchers, given to private landlords, effectively limit a family’s housing cost to 30 percent of its income. The Bush administration proposal would rename the voucher program Housing Assistance for Needy Families and convert it into a block grant for states to administer with few federal guidelines and no guarantee the annual funding would cover the costs to provide needed housing. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, 53 percent of voucher holders are families with children, 40 percent are seniors or people with disabilities and only one in five receives welfare benefits.

Proposes to eliminate civil service protections for Department of Defense workers

The Bush administration has developed legislation that would enable the Defense Department to gut the current personnel system that governs the department workers’ pay, salary increases, hiring, firing, job classifications, performance evaluations, due process and appeal rights, reduction in force rules and many other federal workplace rules. In all, the proposal would allow the department to waive a dozen chapters of Title 5 of the U.S. Code, which covers government organization and federal employment. It would allow the department to create an entirely new personnel system that could eliminate congressional oversight of many personnel policies, strip workers and their unions of current workplace rights and place much more personnel decision making power in the unchecked hands of supervisors.

Proposes new rules to deny Earned Income Tax Credit to working poor

The Bush administration wants to require working poor families to submit extensive new documentation to prove their eligibility for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Supported by President Reagan, the EITC provides a crucial safety net for low-income working families. To be eligible for EITC, a family cannot have an income above $34,692 and the actual amount of the credit varies depending on family size and income. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) claims the new rules are designed to prevent between $6.5 billion and $10 billion in improper EITC payments, but tax experts say that the documentation requirements are likely to discourage many eligible families from applying for EITC. In addition, studies show improper payments to non-EITC individual filers amount to $132 billion plus another $70 billion to offshore corporate accounts and $46 billion for corporations. But while Bush requested some $100 million and 650 new IRS employees to track EITC filers, other tax investigations have fallen by 37 percent and prosecutions by 50 percent.

Proposes rule to end overtime pay for millions of workers

The Bush administration proposed new rules March 27 that would deny overtime pay protections for millions of workers. The changes in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations would affect a wide range of the more than 80 million workers protected by the FLSA. The proposed rules would enable employers to reclassify many workers currently eligible for overtime as managers, administrative or professional employees who are exempt from time-and-a-half overtime. They eliminate overtime protection for large numbers of aerospace, health care, defense, high tech and other workers and also for workers above a certain income level. While the rules raise the income ceiling for some low-income workers to automatically qualify for overtime, many low-income workers would remain uncovered by that automatic protection, and the new rules propose confusing standards on whether low-income supervisors qualify for overtime protection.

Backs bankruptcy bill that will hurt working families

The Bush administration backs an anti-family bankruptcy proposal that te U.S. House of Representatives passed 315–113 March 19. The measure includes a loophole that allows wealthy debtors in five states to shelter income in luxury homes and strips working families of the few financial protections they currently have under bankruptcy law and makes it harder for them to make a financial fresh start. It also forces those owed child support from someone who has declared bankruptcy to compete with other creditors for whatever money is available. Ninety percent of individuals who resort to bankruptcy have come to the financial crisis because of job loss, medical emergency, divorce or other catastrophic event, according to the nonpartisan American Bankruptcy Institute.

Denies airline workers due process in security assessments

The Bush administration issued new rules Jan. 24 that allow the Transportation Security Administration and Federal Aviation Administration to revoke an aviation worker’s certification without basic due process protections. The new rule was issued and took effect without any public comment period. It allows the government to revoke or deny needed federal certification for pilots, mechanics, flight instructors and other aviation workers if the government—under secretive and arbitrary procedures—concludes a worker is a “security threat.” The rule denies an employee the right to an impartial review of the facts and does not require workers be shown the evidence or be told the specific reasons behind a security-risk finding.

Delays new and stronger aircraft maintenance and repair rules

The Bush administration delayed new rules governing repair and maintenance work performed on U.S. airlines’ aircraft at overseas repair stations certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The March 14 action, just days before the start of a war with Iraq and amid growing concern about terrorism and security, came at the request of the airline industry and is opposed by aviation unions and aviation safety groups. In 1988, many U.S. airlines began contracting out their routine maintenance and repair work on aircraft that fly domestic and international routes when the Reagan administration watered down repair station safety regulations. Previously, most work was performed by U.S. mechanics at U.S. repair stations. The new rules, which were to be implemented April 6, would have strengthened the repair and maintenance regulations and requirements for overseas repairs stations to receive and maintain their FAA certification.

Seeking legislation to thwart Medicare appeals when benefits are denied

Bush administration officials are drafting legislation to make it harder for Medicare recipients to appeal the denial of benefits such as home health care and nursing home care. Under current law, beneficiaries who say they were unfairly denied coverage for theses services can take their cases to administrative law judges. In the past five years, about 53 percent of those appealing won their cases, according to The New York Times. But Bush administration officials at the Department of Health and Human Services want other means to resolve the appeals—avenues that may unfairly tilt the scales against the people with disabilities and the elderly who qualify for Medicare. “The president’s proposals would compromise the independence of administrative law judges, who have protected beneficiaries in case after case, year after year,” Judith Stein, director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, told The New York Times March 16.

Negotiated 'Fast Track' trade agreements weaker than existing treaties on workers' rights

Armed with Fast Track trade promotion authority, the Bush administration is moving rapidly to rack up as many so-called free trade agreements as possible. The administration negotiated the first two agreements under Fast Track—deals with Chile and Singapore—in secret and said in February it is not releasing the details to the public until later this year. The deals will go to Congress later this year, and under Fast Track the lawmakers cannot amend the deals and can only approve or reject them as a whole.

Proposed school vouchers

In his fiscal year 2004 budget request, President Bush is asking for $75 million for school voucher programs in several cities, including the District of Columbia. District Mayor Anthony Williams met in early February with top Bush administration education officials to express his opposition to vouchers, which siphon public funds away from public schools and toward private schools that are not accountable to parents, students or taxpayers. The proposed vouchers program would further drain funding from public education at the same time that Bush wants to virtually freeze federal funding to school programs suffering because of state and local governments’ budget crises. Bush’s proposed education “funding levels are unacceptably low,” says the Committee for Education Funding (CEF), a coalition of groups supporting public schools.

Proposed cutting school funds for military

At the same time he is relying on American troops to fight a war in Iraq, President Bush is proposing to cut education funding for children in military families, according to news reports in late February. In his fiscal year 2004 budget request, Bush cuts federal impact aid funding—a federal program established in 1950 to compensate school districts for the property tax income they lose when tax-exempt property (such as military bases) are within their boundaries. Ending the $125 million program would affect 900,000 children, and officials of several school districts have said they would have to cut staff and defer needed building repairs. “I just can’t understand how, at a time when our military men and women are being deployed for a possible war with Iraq, this administration can turn its back on the children of our military personnel.

http://www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/bushwa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for all you hard work..........
unfortunately, i couldn't read the whole thing, but i've bookmarked it for sure. thanks again..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Damn, Bigtree! Kicked and Nominated!
Outstanding, comprehensive post! :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Its time for the Kerry campaign to get on this pony!
Yeah, Kerry should be smelling the blood in the water. This is the time for the Kerry campaign to jump up and smack the snot out of that bully. Quick! before Rove has the chance to re-frame the election in fluffy bunnies and neocon utopia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. In a heap of trouble?
I'd say! Holy Moly! bigtree, this is incredible. Thank You! This will be a great handout to anti-Kerry sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Fantastic post!
Awesome, just awesome! :D :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Looks like the "true facts," bigtree -- thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. "his disapproval in the mid 40s."
Actually, it's around 50%:



With approval in the mid 40's:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Great post!
Thanks for the links - definitely bookmarked for future reference.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Lone Ranger Bush to Tonto (Powell). "How are we going to get out of this?"
Tonto: "What do you mean by WE, White Man?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Way to go Bigtree....thanks for the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. WOW!
:yourock:

Bookmarked this badboy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4sanity Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. "I've got too much good to talk about"
Thanks for an impressive post Bigtree. At my advanced age, I tend to look at things from two perspectives. How will future generations and historians judge us and what effect will current events have on my grandkids. I have developed a folder over the last few years featuring articles and my own scribblings dedicated to explaining how their grandad stood on the issues of our time. Yours is now in it. Again, a big thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks should go to the AFL-CIO for their excellent summary
that makes up the bulk of my post. I can't take credit for their efforts.

Here's the link to their page. Their summary is fully linked with many more goodies than I laid out here.

http://www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/bushwatch/index.cfm?showall=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. bookmarked for later study, thanks
read something in Harper's last night, made methink he's the crapper:

Military reservists(and their families) not too happy at all with their CIC, overseas military absentee ballots, which saved his *ss last time , might kick it this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Ditto (nt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. PFAW has a number of reports, among which we should note:

Courting Disaster
May 2004
What would the actual impact be on Americans’ rights and freedoms if the views of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas become the majority views on the Supreme Court?
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=2756


And for a nice long collection of quick facts, there's:

http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC