Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Manchurian Candidate" will close the F9/11 sale. Bush is TOAST.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:00 PM
Original message
"The Manchurian Candidate" will close the F9/11 sale. Bush is TOAST.
"The Manchurian Candidate", coming out this week, will take the baton from f9/11. It will solidify the threat of Bushian brainwashing, fear-mongering, warmongering and the illegal 2000 selection.

I remember the 1962 original. That was one scary flick. Especially the mother (Angela Lansbury) who uses her brainwashed, programmed son (Korean War hero Lawrence Harvey) in an attempted assassination coup.

It was relevant then and much more so today. The bogeyman was Communism then. Its Terrorism now.

Only the actors have changed. In 1954 it was the alcoholic Sen. Joe McCarthy calling people traitors, using scare tactics, commanding the airwaves. But Joseph Welch came along at the McCarthy hearings and asked "Have you no sense of decency, sir"? And McCarthy was TOAST.

Today its Bush and the corporate whores, brainwashing the American people daily.

But new heroes like Michael Moore and Joe Wilson are making sure that the Little Dictator and his Cheney Cabal are exposed for the corrupt criminals they are. And Bush will soon be TOAST.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. odd - a few weeks ago
the word out of the RW pundits was, "john kerry is the manchurian candidate", which didn't make much sense to me, but those guys make bLankets out of a swatch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. a year ago i was wondering what hollywood
crowd was doing and why they were so quiet. now i know, lol and a wink

coolest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am not sure how this movie will be interpreted...
I was getting the impression that it is more pro-repug, but then again I never saw the original. Is this true??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I read somehwhere that
they were either trying to change some scenes or some makeup on Meryl Streep because she looked and acted too much like Hillary Clinton and they felt it would be bad. Anyone remember any of this? I have never seen the original movie so I am not familiar with the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Streep said she based her performance on Peggy Noonan & Karen Hughes (eom)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Actually, she said that no one has guessed it yet...
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 01:41 PM by jedicord
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=638&ncid=579&e=4&u=/nm/20040720/en_nm/film_streep_dc

This is too rich: "There is a rumor that Paramount asked to tone down scenes that were too much like Hillary Clinton," Streep said. "That disturbed me.


Streep, an Oscar winner for her roles in "The Deer Hunter" and "Sophie's Choice," said she viewed one Internet story about her "Manchurian" performance as part of an insidious attack on Clinton.


"These are high-stakes games these people are playing, high-stakes games, and it gave me the chills when I looked it up," she said.


"And I thought, 'Oh my god. So this is how they get Hillary," she said, insisting, "this is so far from Hillary Clinton.


"This isn't paranoia, this is called misinformation. Disinformation, I guess you call it. It's manipulating public opinion with a fake buzz."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Streep mentioned Noonan and Hughes to Entertainment Weekly
First released in 1962, using the Cold War as a backdrop (and then taken out of release for decades following JFK’s 1963 assassination), the film has been remade under the direction of Jonathan Demme and will hit theaters on July 30. Now set during the first Gulf War era, the new version stars Denzel Washington as Capt./Maj. Bennett Marco (Sinatra’s role in the original) and Liev Schreiber as SSgt. Raymond Shaw (this time as a Gulf War veteran instead of the Korean war hero original cast member Laurence Harvey played). Meryl Streep, cast as Mrs. Iselinin (the role that Angela Lansbury made unforgettable), has disclosed that to prepare for her role as Raymond's evil dragon mother, she watched a string of political talk shows. "Anything with Peggy Noonan Karen Hughes," Streep told Entertainment Weekly. "It’s hard to get more hyperbolic than that."

http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/05/far04017.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Yeah, if Meryl had put on 30lbs.
she would look just like Hughes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. No, the candidate is a creation of a corporation
which is taking over the government. Very anti-corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I don't think that parties are mentioned in the original film, but
if you see it, it's obvious which characters are supposed to be Republican because the ringer is a Joe McCarthy clone, mindlessly patriotic and crude. His counterpart is mild, soft-spoken, but with high principles and brave in the face of intimidation (and he gets offed by the bad guys, hmmmm...).

It was definitely not a pro-Republican film. Hard to say if it actually had a political agenda, as such; it was a political thriller, wherein people who stood by traditional ideas of political fairness and right were the 'good guys.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Watch the original for the first time just last night.
What a great movie. Landsbury really gave me the creeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I might have to rent it.
I've never seen it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Raymond Shaw is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being
I've ever known in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wow! I Just Had Said the Same Thing.
How odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarNoMore Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Dean Koontz
wrote a book, "False Memory", that uses "The Manchurian Candidate" as the basis of its plot. It is all too believable and very creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Dean Koontz is Creepy
but man, am I addicted to his novels!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autobot77 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. Same here...

Its unfortunate he's a repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Really? I'm so surprised!
Since his novels are about (basically) the underhandedness of the government, and I truly think he had to do some hardcore drugs to come up with some of his ideas.

Thank goodness I get his books from the library, and don't pay for them. Ick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autobot77 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. Yep
True, it seems from his novels he would be more libertarian, especially Dark Rivers of the Heart and From the Light of the Moon.However Newsmeat.com shows Dean Koontz and his wife Gerda consistantly contributing to Republican candidiates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tosca Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
50. Landsbury really gave me the creeps.
Unbelievable performance. Evil personified.

And from what I hear, Meryl will take the Oscar this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hope yer right...
...but I honestly think people are more brainwashed than they were back in the 1950s. The corporate media are much more invasive now than they were back then. A lot of people didn't even have TVs in the McCarthy era; now people own several of them in one house. As an old guy, I've been watching this trend over the years--people actually do seem more gullible to me now than they did even 30 years ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. from the Hollywood Reporter's review:
And while a conscious attempt has been made not to align Raymond with any particular political party, a number of the film's plot points, including the concept of a manufactured presidential candidate and a compliant media in an era of heightened terrorist activity, will likely bring a smirk to Michael Moore's face.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/reviews/review_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000580589
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't forget that the original film was "disappeared".
It was pulled out of circulation and I believe not seen for decades after it's original release. I wonder if that will happen again :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyGal Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Pulled due to Kennedy assassination
It was pulled after President Kennedy was killed. Too close in content to the actual event. Nothing more than that to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No, it wasn't
That's the legend that started around the film. Sinatra got involved in a fight over the ownership of the film and kept it out of circulation for years until he got the rights to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. The film was pulled 13 months before Kennedy's assassination.
The current issue of Newsweek claims it was pulled just weeks after its initial release, as the Cuban Missile Crisis heating up; at the time, shocking images in the film were considered too controversial, such as a knife cutting into an American flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Wrong.
You're thinking of a different movie where Sinatra played an hired killer. I'll have to find you the name...but NOT Manchurian Candidate. Quit listening to rightwing hate radio. Full of errors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. The movie you mentioned is called "Suddenly"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Thanks!
smart lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. So why was Manchurian Candidate pulled from distribution?
I had heard in film school (not from right-wing radio) that Sinatra pulled Manchurian Candidate from distribution after the JFK assasination. I just did quite a bit of online searching and found a reference that said this story had been debunked but I couldn't find any actual debunking. It's interesting that this exact same story would circulate around another Sinatra film (Suddenly). Is it possible that both films were merely flops and Sinatra found an astute way to create a little long-lasting buzz and mystery around the two movies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Here's some info...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #37
52. That really was interesting, thanks
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyGal Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hillary is toasted
From what I have read, Meryl Streep plays a Hillary look-alike meglomaniac. I think this movie will hurt her, more than Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Incorrect — see post #19 (eom)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. And #13...
"And I thought, 'Oh my god. So this is how they get Hillary," she said, insisting, "this is so far from Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. The role was originally of a senator's wife, played by Angela Lansbury.
The only change made between the original script and today's is that the role has been changed to that of a female Senator. Things changed for women between 1961 and 2004, and it would be silly in modern context to have the character remain a Senator's spouse.

Hillary is hardly the first powerful woman in the history of the United States, and it's laughable to think that Streep has no other real-life persons on which to draw her inspiration than Hillary. There are simply no similarities between the character and the current New York Senator, other than their gender.

My guess is Streep drew inspiration from a composite of power-hungry men throughout American history. Is that so much of a stretch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. self edited
self edited
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Wrong.
Karen Hughes, possibly. But Meryl says absolutely NOT Hillary. Sorry. You'll have to go back to hate-radio for your Hillary bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. Why does the right HATE Hilary Clinton?
Could it be she is intelligent?
Could it be she can do a better job than any of them ever will be able to do?
Could it be she's a true Christian - one who loves others, even her enemies?
Just askin'.



The only job for which George W. Bush is qualified.
This is not my monkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Yeah, I don't get it. I'm a Dem and I hate Hillary
imagine that, something in common with the RW nutjobs.

Hillary's a DINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Good point.
So maybe Bill is smarter. And he was closer to a puke than a Lib. But then, that doesn't explain the nutjob's POV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
49. That is why the Right hate her
She was once one of them and she left them.

I don't hate her, I just don't think she is the second coming. She is a competent woman doing a competent job. I do feel she is closer to Lieberman than to Kennedy, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. You wish it would hurt Hillary more than Bush, sweetie


Only 4?

Did you win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'm still pissed about this movie
I absolutely love the original. I know the cast is good, but why screw with a nearly perfect film? There is simply no way to improve upon the concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I'm sure it won't be an improvement on the original,
but at least it looks like they've changed the story a bit. A straight remake would have been even more annoying. At first I instinctively turned my nose up at the idea of a new Manchurian Candidate but after watching the trailer I think I might like to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. new Manchurian Candidate sent by Halliburton!
it seems to be a pretty interesting remake, given the current political climate. I posted some excerpts from the Variety review here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=105&topic_id=1431087&mesg_id=1431087
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
56. The ManChimpian Candidate, a Chimp turned into a Puppet Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. movie poster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #34
48. Nice Poster
And Paul Krugman's Tuesday column "The Arabian Candidate" was, of course, spot on ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/20/opinion/20krug.html?th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. Nice theory you got there, TruthIsAll!
Very nice.



What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
What was Raymond doing with his hands!?!
(WHACK!)
To wipe the smirk off his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clown Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. you forgot the other line ;)
I just watched it for the first time last night, it was cheap because of the new one, and in that scene sinatra was alternating between 'what was raymond doing with his hands?' and some other line, something like 'how did that woman turn into a russian?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL! Yeah.


MARCO:
How did the old ladies turn into
Russians?! What was Raymond doing
with his hands?! What were you
doing there?! What was Raymond
doing with his hands?! What were
you doing there?!

LOL! That movie's a masterpiece. For everybody involved, from Sinatra and Lansbury and Leigh and Harvey and Frankenheimer and Axelrod...




BTW: A hearty welcome to DU, clown! I really like the moniker! Where ya been?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clown Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. thanks :)
well i was lurking for a while, then finally decided to join up, i dont post very often because it seems that by the time i get to a thread, everything has been said, but i still love to read the debates going on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
44. I remember it not so much as a Repub or Dem thing, but as a
'this is what is possible' thing. And we've learned that a lot is possible. In those days it was also a politician-military thing as I remember it. Today it is a politician-corporate-military-banking-preacher thing. I'll go see it. Especially after reading that Meryl had Peggy Noonan in mind. Meryl - good Dem. Peggy - phoney suave. I was going to say something worse about Noonan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
51. The original "Manchurian Candidate" is awesome....
I had only watched it once, years ago, and it was one of those movies that you remember vividly! Either earlier this year or late last year it was shown on television and I was able to watch it again, it was just as chilling the second time around. I am looking forward to the remake to compare!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. DOn't forget to add moveon.org and Wes Boyd to heros...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
57. Sludge is already railing against the movie
Claims Frank Rich of NYT is going to write that this movie is Dem propoganda.

"I cannot recall when Hollywood last released a big-budget mainstream feature film as partisan as this one at the height of a presidential campaign."

So believes NY TIMES's Frank Rich about the upcoming PARAMOUNT thriller MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.

"Freed from any obligations to fact, MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE can play far dirtier than FAHRENHEIT 911," writes Rich in a column set for release this Sunday, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.

"This movie could pass for the de facto fifth day of the convention itself."

MORE

"The American people are terrified," says Streep's villainous senator early on as, John Ashcroft-style, she wields a national security report promising "another cataclysm, probably nuclear." And so we watch her and the rest of the Manchurian Global cabal exploit that fear in any way possible, using the mass media as a brainwashing tool, manipulating patriotic iconography for political ends. "Compassionate vigilance" is one campaign slogan. A televised election night rally features a Mount Rushmore backdrop (as in a signature Bush photo op) and a chorus line of heroic cops and firemen (reminiscent of the early Bush-Cheney ads exploiting the carnage at ground zero)."

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash7.htm

'WHAT WE NEED is more people who specialize in the impossible," said poet Theodore Roethke.
Would it be possible to can all the obvious speculation that Meryl Streep based her senator-villain in the remake of "The Manchurian Candidate" on New York's real-life Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton?

The 13-time Oscar nominee has more imagination than that. Take it from me, the two people Meryl studied were Karen Hughes, the former and still-sometimes adviser to President George W. Bush, and Reagan speechwriter and conservative thinker Peggy Noonan.

And as I said yesterday, she added big dollops of her own Streep self. The funny part.

http://www.nypost.com/gossip/liz.htm

Politics and presidential elections were on everyone's lips at Monday's Gotham preem of "The Manchurian Candidate."

"This is a movie about political brainwashing, and we're right back there again now," said director Jonathan Demme. "I hope it has the potential for stimulating people to start thinking about the process because Lord knows we could use some stimulation," he added.

"It raises lots of questions and gets us thinking about assassinations and other things we went through and were traumatized by in the '60s," said Jon Voight, who plays a liberal senator bumped out of the vice presidential candidacy.

Even score collaborator Wyclef Jean and his band, who performed an exuberant set at the swanky uptown Metropolitan Club after-bash, displayed a political bent with his song "If I Was President."

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1953&u=/variety/20040721/va_vp/preem_pumps_politics&printer=1

I rented the original after seeing previews for the new version at Fahreneheit 9-11. The original is really spooky and brings back memories of how spooky it must've been when it premiered back in 62 when a month later we would have the Cuban Missile Crisis and a year later JFK's assasination. I'm going to make sure I'm at the premiere in Pittsburgh of this new version. I think it will be interesting how it parallels current events and this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. One reviewer said Meryl Streep reminds them more of Barbara Bush!
Edited on Fri Jul-23-04 11:17 AM by wishlist
I had my back turned to the TV so don't know which reviewer and can't recall which network, but they were debunking the idea that Meryl was channeling Hillary.

I can't wait to see it. With this great cast and political controversy brewing, bets lots of other movie goers can't wait to see it either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC