http://www.drivedemocracy.org/blog/index.php?p=5Original--
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=301260In a 2003 study of 38 democracies across the globe, authors Dennis C. Mueller and Thomas Stratmann found that increased voter turnout results in dramatically diminished income disparity. The gap closes between rich and poor. More people vote in “strong” democracies because government is responsive to their needs. (This need not mean government programs. It just means government tends to do what voters ask it to do.) Responsive governments create wealth. GNP rises. The rich don’t get richer at the expense of the poor. Voters get results, and their confidence as citizens rises.
But the reverse is also true. One would think that those punished by cruel and inattentive governments would rise up and demand their due. But that is not the case in the 38 democracies studied.
Unresponsive governments produce smaller voter turnouts, greater income disparity, and diminished economic growth. The rich, however, usually do get richer, and the poor get poorer.
According to recent research, people vote when they have confidence as citizens and when they feel free to express their opinions. A government that goes right after that confidence need not worry about rebellion. In fact, cutting services to the underprivileged has a direct voter suppression effect.