Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthem/Wellpoint Merger Rejected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-04 01:43 AM
Original message
Anthem/Wellpoint Merger Rejected

http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2004/07/19/d...

California Department of Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi on Friday rejected the proposed Anthem/WellPoint merger, stating Californians would have to pay for the $16 billion deal.

Mr. Garamendi made his announcement soon after the California Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) had approved the merger. The DMHC had negotiated a $122 million investment in California health-care services with Anthem and WellPoint.

"Commissioner Garamendi's politically motivated decision is a clear abuse of discretion that cannot possibly benefit Californians," said Thomas C. Geiser, WellPoint's general counsel.

"To deny this application after eight months of review and receiving approvals from the DMHC, 10 other state regulators, the United States Department of Justice and 97 percent of the outstanding shares of both companies which were voted at separate shareholder meetings, demonstrates that Mr. Garamendi has overstepped his authority as a state insurance commissioner," said Mr. Geiser.

Thank you Mr. Garamendi - Here's what really happens when Blue Cross plans collude under a pretext of lowering consumer costs. It's reminiscent of the Blue Cross of N.E. Ohio's merger with Medical Mutual (Blue Shield). First, the Long-Range System Plans that show lowest cost per claim will be ignored and the higher cost plan will be the surviving entity; next, a very high-cost ad blitz will "convince" consumers of the merits of the merger; then, the lay-offs will begin with employees coerced into waiving their civil rights in order to receive severence along with possible non-compete clauses hindering employees' abilities to obtain employment in the same or similar field. Then the corporate President, that time around, John Burry, will send Christmas greetings to their ex-employees wishing them well just as their severence ends! No, Virginia, there is no Santa Claus this year...nor any year in which the bottom-line is achieved at the expense of employees' careers and security.

Wife of a fully-vested former BCNO employee raises a cheer to Mr. Garamendi, HIP, HIP, HOORAY - Trouble is, corporations usually get what they want one way or another. At least Californian's would only need to foot the bill for one company car (Ferrari).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC