Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Clinton bringing up the AWB a good idea?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:11 PM
Original message
Was Clinton bringing up the AWB a good idea?
He had an awesome speech. I was cheering and feeling great, and then he started talking about the damned AWB. It felt like I got kicked in the nuts.

What do you think? Was this a good thing to do on a national stage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. awb?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Assault Weapons Ban nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. nod. figured that out just after i posted
but not quite in time.

anyway, nevermind. i've no easy opinion on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. assault weapons ban
and yes it was a good idea, or did democrats stop wanting to keep dangerous weapons off the streets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I thought it was killer!
And why would the repubs want them on the street?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Assault Weapons Ban nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's awb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Absolutely, it's a winning issue for us
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. AWB deserves to die.
Edited on Mon Jul-26-04 10:15 PM by Massacure
A criminal will think twice if they have reason to believe somebody has an Ak-47 under their trench coat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemocratInSC Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. If we're going to let citizens be armed to kill in a serious way ...
... let's do it right. I want plutonium powder. Right now it's illegal for any citizen to possess plutonium because it is the most poisonous substance on earth, but it's no more poisonous than a bullet fired point blank by a law-abiding citizen into a criminal's head.

Let's say that I pull into a grocery store parking lot and some guy comes to my car and starts bothering me, wanting some money to go somewhere. I tell him no, but he persists, and I think he wants to rob me. I warn him to back off. He doesn't back off. I warn him again. He get's testy and starts pushing, so I take my little squeeze bottle of plutonium and give him a little tiny puff of plutonium powder in his face. The guy sneezes about 3 times and curses at me while I walk into the grocery store. When I get back to my car I see that he has vomited next to my car and has gone away. Two days later the guy is dead.

I'm sure that you'll support this idea because you're in favor of citizens being able to kill criminals if it's necessary to do so. The means of death doesn't matter to you. The fact that the criminal can be killed is what matters to you.

An AK-47 is a pussy weapon compared to a little squeeze bottle of plutonium powder. Don't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ohh the Gungeon is gonna stir tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Its like that moment in THe Lord of the Rings
I'm hearing the Balrog stirring :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. it was awesome!
A lot of people don't know about it. I thought it was great at pointing out:

They: want to put assault weapons back on the street and take police officers off the street

We: want to keep assault weapons off the street and put police officers on the street.

Very succinct and a great point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. In this case, yes
Because of the way he did it, he made Dems look good on it, and Republicans look incredibly cheap and bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. I thought he framed it very well
He coupled the expiration of the assault weapons ban with the lack of funding for more municipal firefighters and police officers. He drew a very nice parallel between the Republicans' failure to fund the first responders with their failure to extend the assault weapons ban, and I'm sure there are a lot of people who would prefer to let the police protect them than have to go out and buy their own assault rifle to guard their property. I know I would.

He also made the very good point that crime statistics, which had been decreasing throughout his presidency were now again on the rise. Odd what some people will do when they no longer can go to work at a decent wage or don't have any hope for the future, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparrow Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. I give Bill a pass
his passion and talent make up for the anti-2nd amendment stance.
It wont be renewed so who cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Anti-2nd amendment stance?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Well he did sign the AWB in the first place, didn't he? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. It was well stated. This ban is going to die in the midst of thousands
of policeman losing their jobs, and our at risk kids losing the funding that keeps them off the streets. It was very well done in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well I totally agree with him, but I don't think it matters much..
..what I mean is that I don't think it harmed or helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Sure! Both parties love the Average White Band!
What's that smell? Oh, it's old, stale jokes. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. AWB???
Used to be Average White Band. Had one hit I think. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. You beat me to it...
:)

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think we need the ban
I thought the party as a whole agreed, and the majority of the country in general. Am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Lots of people here don't support the ban.
Why do you think we need it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Why do we need assault weapons?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. To defend our homes from the very possibly fascist government
that would be upon us if Bush wins another term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. So it's OK to ban something if you've judged
that people don't need it? :shrug:

What does the AWB ban anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mellowinman Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. Congratulations!
On starting the only negative thread on this forum tonight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. How is this thread negative? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC