I don't know if this has been discussed yet; but thought I would mention that I saw Control Room last night. For those who aren't familiar with it, it is a documentary on how al-Jazeera covered the Invasion of Iraq. It's very well done, and in some ways is superior to Farenheit 9/11. It has two great advantages, in my mind.
1). It humanizes the Muslim/Arabic people in a way neither the American Media nor Michael Moore's movie accomplishes. Part of this is that Moore is focused on President Bush, and thus only takes us to the middle east for brief periods of time. Granted he shows them in a sympathetic light. But showing them as helpless victims doesn't humanize them much more than showing them as cartoonish villians. It still denys them that spark of individuality. (Again, i'm aware he had a limited amount of time). Whereas in Control Room because it is focused on the al-Jazeera staff, it spends a lot more time showing them as people.
2). Control Room is a lot more removed and even clinical in how it presents its information. In that way, I think it encourages a great deal more skepticism about how we treat the news; both American news sources and Al Jazeera itself. Michael Moore's movie is very manipulative. I'm not saying it's not a great film; I thoroughly enjoyed it, and I think it made numerous great points. But it's hard to buy a message about not letting the media manipulate you when you are watching a movie that is also trying to manipulate you. The distance in Control Room, showing how stories are formed (on both sides of the fence), gives you the distance to come to your own conclusions.
On the other hand, Control Room obviously doesn't cover how the Bush Adminsitration Deceived us into Iraq, nor does it cover the connections between the Bush Family and Saudi Arabia (possibly the most important aspect of Farenheit 9/11. So I would still think they are both good and important movies to see.
Bryant
check it out -->
http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com