genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:30 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Should the platform call for a repeal of USA-PATRIOT? |
k in IA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. How about repeal some parts but some parts may be necessary. |
|
It doesn't have to be an all or nothing proposition.
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. What good parts? The whole thing is garbage. |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Then vote on those individual points one by one. There are too many unknown nooks and crannies in that bill. It has to go in toto. Then whatever's worth keeping can be discussed in the light of day.
This bill is the Secret Police bill. Do you get that? This is the KGB bill.
|
k in IA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. I essentially said the same thing you did and don't disagree with your |
|
strategy but lets not get all black or white/ good or bad - there are shades of gray.
|
MajorFlaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. "Rolling" wiretaps, which allow the monitoring of any phone that the |
|
subject uses are long overdue. Most of the rest is crap. I don't know that we want to raise an issue laden with subtleties and interpretation in our platform.
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. That means they could be tapping your phone now. |
MajorFlaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
17. If they had a court order they could. The change here is that, rather |
|
than allowing a tap on a particular phone line a judge can authorize a tap on any phone that the subject of the tap uses. Pretty reasonable in an age of cell and mobile phones. Of course there is the possibility of abuse. That's why we must focus the spotlight on who gets appointed to the bench.
|
rangerfan
(176 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The platform already supports the Patriot Act. WHY????? n/t |
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. They're voting on the platform today. It's not too late. |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. It has all been decided by the platform committee |
|
The convention will simply rubber-stamp what the committee has produced.
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. They don't have to rubber stamp it unless they have rubber brains |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. The platform committee was made up of mostly Kerry primary supporters |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-27-04 01:02 PM by Freddie Stubbs
The delegates are mostly Kerry primary supporters. They are not going to produce a document that contridicts the guy they supported in the primary.
|
sangh0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Someone obviously understands they can't just argue themerits of their position
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. The merits are that we lost the Bill of Rights when USA-PATRIOT |
sangh0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. That should have been your opener |
|
It shouldn't take prompting for you to make a rational argument
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. It is kind of clear from the content. Where have you been since 2001? |
GreenArrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Wont repeal any. Will likely add more.
|
porphyrian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And everyone who voted it in should be drawn and quartered.
|
AntiCoup2K4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
19. There are no good parts of the Patriot act and no reasonable defense of it |
|
Criminals can be investigated and prosecuted within existing, constitutional laws.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Sure there are some good parts |
|
Relaxed restrictions on information sharing between U.S. law enforcement and intelligence officers about suspected terrorists.
Makes it illegal to knowingly harbor a terrorist.
Tripling the number of Border Patrol, Customs Service Inspectors and Immigration and Naturalization Service inspectors at the northern border of the United States, and providing $100 million to improve technology and equipment on the U.S. border with Canada.
Eliminating the statute of limitations for prosecuting the most egregious terrorist acts, but maintaining the statute of limitation on most crimes at five to eight years.
|
On the Road
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
20. No Need to Repeal It, Just Let it Lapse. |
|
Personally, I don't think it will make it past the sunset date.
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-27-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Some parts don't lapse. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |