Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the platform call for a repeal of USA-PATRIOT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:30 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should the platform call for a repeal of USA-PATRIOT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about repeal some parts but some parts may be necessary.
It doesn't have to be an all or nothing proposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What good parts? The whole thing is garbage.
I've had to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. NO. Repeal all.
Then vote on those individual points one by one. There are too many unknown nooks and crannies in that bill. It has to go in toto. Then whatever's worth keeping can be discussed in the light of day.

This bill is the Secret Police bill. Do you get that? This is the KGB bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I essentially said the same thing you did and don't disagree with your
strategy but lets not get all black or white/ good or bad - there are shades of gray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "Rolling" wiretaps, which allow the monitoring of any phone that the
subject uses are long overdue. Most of the rest is crap. I don't know that we want to raise an issue laden with subtleties and interpretation in our platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That means they could be tapping your phone now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. If they had a court order they could. The change here is that, rather
than allowing a tap on a particular phone line a judge can authorize a tap on any phone that the subject of the tap uses. Pretty reasonable in an age of cell and mobile phones. Of course there is the possibility of abuse. That's why we must focus the spotlight on who gets appointed to the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rangerfan Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. The platform already supports the Patriot Act. WHY????? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They're voting on the platform today. It's not too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. It has all been decided by the platform committee
The convention will simply rubber-stamp what the committee has produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They don't have to rubber stamp it unless they have rubber brains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The platform committee was made up of mostly Kerry primary supporters
Edited on Tue Jul-27-04 01:02 PM by Freddie Stubbs
The delegates are mostly Kerry primary supporters. They are not going to produce a document that contridicts the guy they supported in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Push-poll
Someone obviously understands they can't just argue themerits of their position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The merits are that we lost the Bill of Rights when USA-PATRIOT
was enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That should have been your opener
It shouldn't take prompting for you to make a rational argument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It is kind of clear from the content. Where have you been since 2001?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Should repeal it ALL
Wont repeal any. Will likely add more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Abso-Fuckin'-Lutely.
And everyone who voted it in should be drawn and quartered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. There are no good parts of the Patriot act and no reasonable defense of it
Criminals can be investigated and prosecuted within existing, constitutional laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Sure there are some good parts
Relaxed restrictions on information sharing between U.S. law enforcement and intelligence officers about suspected terrorists.

Makes it illegal to knowingly harbor a terrorist.

Tripling the number of Border Patrol, Customs Service Inspectors and Immigration and Naturalization Service inspectors at the northern border of the United States, and providing $100 million to improve technology and equipment on the U.S. border with Canada.

Eliminating the statute of limitations for prosecuting the most egregious terrorist acts, but maintaining the statute of limitation on most crimes at five to eight years.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. No Need to Repeal It, Just Let it Lapse.
Personally, I don't think it will make it past the sunset date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Some parts don't lapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC