Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush on Clinton speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:46 PM
Original message
Rush on Clinton speech
Edited on Tue Jul-27-04 01:53 PM by shockingelk
Apparently, it's all about "one tiny part". Here's the part (and I agree with Rush that this and the part preceding it about how we don't need a divided electorate, but they do - is the most powerful part of of Clinton's speech):

"After 9/11, we all wanted to be one nation, strong in the fight against terror. The president had a great opportunity to bring us together under his slogan of compassionate conservatism and to unite the world in common cause against terror. Instead, he and his congressional allies made a very different choice: to use the moment of unity to push America too far to the right and to walk away from our allies, not only in attacking Iraq before the weapons inspectors finished their jobs, but in withdrawing American support for the Climate Change Treaty, the International Court for war criminals, the ABM treaty, and even the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty."

Rush says all of that is factually untrue. He attempted to show that by stating these points:

#1 That if Bush would have moved to the right, he'd be "ahead by 60% in the polls." (my comment: earlier in the show a caller asked "What? Are you believing the Democrat's polls?" to which Rush replied, "I don't believe any polls.")

#2 Because Bush went to the UN and got a resolution. (my comment: and then we walked away from it)

#X Rush ignored the part about about attacking Iraq before the inspections were finished, as if Clinton never said it.

#3 Climate Change: "Kyoto was killed four months before Bush took office." (my comment: Clinton said the US walked away from it, not that we killed it)

#4: AMB treaty: "The ABM treaty was with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union doesn't exist, so there already was no treaty ... this is the shortest version I can give." (my comment: so we all can assume he could give a longer version that may have kinda sorta made a bit of sense)

When Rush was presenting his thing in #1, he veered off into a Lewinski tirade - ("I've been in the Oval room. I was there, I know"). When he realized he was trying to "divide the electorate", he stopped himself, "I didn't mean to say any of that, it just came out."

(on edit - Limbaugh did say something about the ICC court, but I was distracted - it has something to do with "we don't want our soldiers to be" - but he numbered the issues #1-#4 as if Clinton only made four claims and all of them were false)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. About the ABM treaty....
When the Soviet Union collapsed, didn't all treaties with the USSR become treaties with the individual states in the USSR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. With Russia, I believe
Here's info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABM_treaty

The more important post is that Bush wouldn't have notified Russia we were withdrawing from the treaty if there was no treaty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Typical
Rush often contradicts himself even in the same show.

I don't see how you can stand to listen to him. I used to listen to him, but he made me ill. I guess it's good to know what the enemy is saying and Rush gets his talking points straight from the RNC so we know this is basically how the Republican elite think, but you're a better person than me for being able to sit through that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares what he thinks? Just say No and tune to another station. Rush
is never going to give a thoughtful analysis of anything so I avoid him. I don't want to fill up my beautiful mind with his sophomoric ramblings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's like saying "Who cares if Nader runs" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC