lottie244
(903 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-28-04 10:45 AM
Original message |
What were GW's 'credentials' on security before he was selected? |
|
Zero, zilch, nada. What was GW's 'credentials' regarding anything before he was selected. A failed businessman who was bailed out by poppy's friends and at public expense. An alcoholic and coke snorter womanizer and cheater in school. Who has enough nerve to come forward and tell about GW's real antics the real horror stories that Scaife and Murdoch have so adeptly kept hidden from public eyes and ears?
How can we say that Bush is best for security when we know for a fact that 9/11 happened on his watch as he diddled at the ranch?
|
LeinesRed
(735 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-28-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. standard Republican reply: |
|
but these are different times!!!! Post 9/11 world..blah, blah, blah!
|
olddem43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-28-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Meanwhile, back at the ranch... |
|
Just like in the old cowboy movies. He's really just an actor, pretending to be in charge.
|
lovedems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-28-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
3. What are his credentials now? |
|
A failed foreign policy of pre-emption, record setting deficits over the last 3 years with each one breaking the previous record!, an attack that happened on his watch while he spent the month before on vacation stressing about stem cell research instead of terrorism, record high job loss, millions of uninsured families, a medicare overhaul that is pharmeceutical friendly, need I say more?
I get your point, what were his credentials in 2000? I say after 4 years in the Oval Office, he still doesn't have the necessary credentials to lead this country.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message |