My comments to CNN....hehe

[greenbriar]

I just called them and told them Judy woodruf and wolf blitzer were competing for Hannity and o reily's jobs, I told them also that the ONLY time I watched CNN was when Carville was on Crossfire.


I told them that they should rename them selves fox lite because that is what they were becoming. Next I asked if they have seen outfoxed??? They were next

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

1. Their coverage has been atrocious

Constant fucking bashing. In every interview they conduct, they try to get Dems to eat each other, whether it's on the war or something else, they keep trying to divide us. I am proud of our party though - no matter how hard they try, we will not cave. We will not divide. We are united against kicking all their asses out of power once and for all!

[rwork]

2. We have watched all of the convention coverage on C-Span.

It is so nice to watch with out hearing any negative bias. We did watch M. Moore on O'Reilly. When Bill would turn to so kindly let us watch Ted Kennedy, we could feel the cynicism dripping. Al Sharpton was great last night.

[Shopaholic]

3. Here's mine:

Ralph Reed? What the Cheney were you people thinking? That's the person you go to for commentary immediately following John Edwards' speech? I swear I thought I was watching Fox News there for a minute. Just how much more blatant could you have been in your support of Bush-Cheney? You ought to have been running a scroll beneath Ralph Reed saying "This message approved by George W Bush"! Couldn't you have at least gotten your regular commentary team to comment on before going straight to BushCo for a response? Tell me, when you cover the Republican convention, will you go straight to Howard Dean or Al Sharpton or someone similar IMMEDIATELY after a Cheney or Bush speech for commentary? My guess is--NO. No wonder CNN is losing viewers. You can't beat Fox by becoming Fox--or is that even what this obvious and blatant bias is about? I'm waiting for a documentary that will expose the biases of CNN as well as Fox.It's high-time someone exposed the double-standard at CNN in regards to Democratic vs. Republican coverage. Perhaps if you're anchors weren't paid so much money and earned what the rest of us working folks do, you'd have more empathy for the Democrats. I guess if I was pulling down hundreds of thousands of dollars a year--I might vote Republican too. Oh second thought, no, that's totally not true because you see, I have a real problem with people who lie and distort and do so repeatedly. That's my problem with the Bush administration and it's my problem with CNN!

[HEFFA]

4. I'm just hoping that they use Nader, Moore, Alterman, and Zinn as analysts

for the RNC in August. That would be "fair and balanced," wouldn't it?

But no; I'm sure we'll see a real love fest from all sides then. Whores.

[ClassWarrior]

5. That's great. Everybody call 404-827-0234.

I like to call their anchors "spokesmodels" when I'm talking to them. Especially Paula Zahnow.