Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HELP!!!!!!!! I just got this sent to me by a "friend"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 11:54 PM
Original message
HELP!!!!!!!! I just got this sent to me by a "friend"
Help me respond to this crap via other website hyperlinks, responses, etc. Any help would be appreciated. Believe or not, I may be able to "turn" this one... and every single switch makes a difference this year!!!

Here is is.... I'm pretty sure its from Newsmax...

David Limbaugh
Thursday, July 22, 2004
1. The following is a non-exhaustive list of what a John Kerry supporter might believe. Human life begins at conception, but so what?

John Kerry supports mainstream American values. John Kerry is liberal. John Kerry is not liberal - he's conservative because he advocates reducing the budget deficit - presumably through his nearly $1 trillion health care plan.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, but I'll be darned if public officials should do anything in their lawful exercise of power to preserve the institution of heterosexual marriage.
The definition of unilateral military action by the United States is the U.S. leading a coalition: 1) including Britain and almost 50 other nations; or 2) of every nation in the world, excluding the nation being attacked, Germany and France; or 3) any number of nations, but failing to secure the blessing of the United Nations.
Preemptive military action - a first strike against a nation that is believed to constitute a threat to the U.S. - is presumptuous, arrogant, reckless and irresponsible, even if the resulting military action also liberates the people of the target nation from tyranny and brutality. But unprovoked military action against a sovereign nation, such as Serbia, that couldn't possibly constitute a threat to the United States or its strategic interests is honorable and desirable.
The following were sufficient cause for Congress to authorize President Bush to lead a U.S. military action against Iraq when it was politically expedient to support such action, but the very same factors were insufficient cause to authorize such action when it became politically expedient later to oppose such action:
17 violations of United Nations resolutions by Iraq
repeated breaches of its post-Gulf-War treaties
the delivery of a deceitful 12,000-page report concerning its required disposal of WMD it admittedly possessed and had previously used against its own people
its repeated defiance of weapons inspectors, the unanimous belief among the world's best intelligence agencies, French, British, Russian and American, that Saddam had or was rapidly developing stockpiles of WMD, that Iraq was supportive of terrorism and friendly with Al Qaeda, though the two hadn't signed and published a formal friendship pact.
Our invasion of Iraq was precipitated by neoconservative imperialists to project American power for its own sake and simultaneously by Dick Cheney to line his Halliburtonized pockets.
George Bush has exaggerated the terrorist threat. George Bush hasn't taken the terrorist threat seriously enough.
Dubious decorated military service in Vietnam coupled with admissions of personal misconduct and commission of war atrocities against civilians better qualifies one for commander in chief than three years of on-the-job training in the position.
Enron is a political (rather than merely financial) scandal tainting the Bush administration because Republicans love big, evil corporations.
The most effective purveyors of conservatism, by virtue of espousing conservative doctrine, are intrinsically guilty of hate speech, but the anti-Bush rantings of the Maureen Dowds and Michael Moores are born of loving kindness.
The prisoner abuses of Abu Ghraib are more outrageous than terrorist beheadings of coalition soldiers and civilians.
Republicans, in concert with the U.S. Supreme Court, stole the 2000 presidential election even though independent studies concluded the president would have won anyway had the vote count proceeded. And, holding on to this irrational belief justifies an unquenchable grudge against President Bush because there's nothing wrong with hate when it's directed against hateful Republicans - just like there's nothing wrong with intolerance when directed against intolerant conservatives and Christians.
The anti-American United Nations should supervise American elections.
The determining factor in racism is not how one feels and behaves in his personal life, but whether he passes certain litmus tests on public policy, such as supporting affirmative action and opposing school choice, though those policies may harm minorities and diminish their dignity more than helping them.
The definition of compassion is a willingness to support government confiscation and redistribution of other people's money rather than personal generosity and graciousness.
One's character is determined more by the public policies he conspicuously advocates, which often involve no personal sacrifice or inconvenience, than how he conducts himself when no one is looking.
Congressional Democrats should not be held accountable for emasculating the CIA during the eighties and beyond when lambasting President Bush for presiding over today's intelligence failures, which he - like they - reasonably relied on.
The Patriot Act was necessary when it was expedient to support it, but is terrible at the enforcement hands of the focus of modern evil, John Ashcroft.
We should have more U.S. Supreme Court justices who believe we ought to rely more heavily on international law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. ask him to supply sources and quotes, then I might be able to help
this is just drivel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mark it as SPAM

And be done with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Your answers were in Kerry's speech tonight...should be text somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. if it is from anyone with the name "Limbaugh"
I automatically delete it becuase I know they are on perscription drugs and are avidly abusing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. omgoodness - your friend disgorged his entire intestinal tract on this
His rant exhausts me - can you try one word for starters with him? How about 'mislead?' You could add 'mushroom cloud' and '45 minutes' as off the top of your head quick answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. David Limbaugh fed off his brother, Rush's, name
and wrote some nonsensical religious book. Anyone listening to Rush's brother, or Rush is a waste of time. Same with folks who are solid Fox viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just say "R-I-G-H-T. . . You guys are really desperate, arent you?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. wow. No real con will read this. They will read the first three
Edited on Fri Jul-30-04 12:18 AM by jdjkkse
lines and go "yeah, what he said".

Ask your friend what he believes. Forget what they pukes tell him the dems believe. Ask him would he believe a letter sent by Michael Moore outlining what the pukes believe?

I don't sink so.

oh, this is priceless:

"The most effective purveyors of conservatism, by virtue of espousing conservative doctrine, are intrinsically guilty of hate speech, but the anti-Bush rantings of the Maureen Dowds and Michael Moores are born of loving kindness."

Criticizing Bush is now "hate-speech"?

Now I've heard everything.


edit: " After finishing school, Limbaugh taught business law at Southeast Missouri State from 1977 to 1978. He was admitted to the bar in 1978 and has practiced law for 20 years. He is presently a partner in the firm of Limbaugh, Russell, Payne and Howard."

He's an attorney. You know they'll say anything to make a buck, tell your friend that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC