Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did repug Gov Bill Owens unwittingly suggest LIHOP/MIHOP on Bill Maher?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:00 AM
Original message
Did repug Gov Bill Owens unwittingly suggest LIHOP/MIHOP on Bill Maher?
He said a couple of times that there was no need for bush to do anything because they knew what was happening, and going to happen. I know he didn't mean to say that, but it came out that way. I'd like to see the transcript.

And if he really does think that there wasn't a reason for bush to be concerned and take action when Card spoke to him, I would like to hear Owens' explanation as to how the headquarters of the greatest military power the world has ever known was successfully hit by a bunch of horizontal-flying nitwits half an hour after we had things under control. The military has probably received $5 trillion dollars since the end of the Cold War, and yet they couldn't even defend their own headquarters almost an hour after they knew the nation was under attack? I'd like a refund on my taxes for all the money I've sent to the Department of "Defense"--the first time we actually needed them to defend us from an attack they failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
My Pet Goat Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Regarding "we knew what was happening"...
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 12:37 AM by My Pet Goat
he's just making shit up. Why was Cheney was ordering shoot downs? Why did the government react so inefficiently? Why was Bush was flying around in circles all day afraid of further phantom attacks?

Even if they had an inkling of what was going on, they had a duty to find out more and ASAP.

Assuming he did know everything that was going on, then in his position as commander in chief he was under an EXTREME duty to ACT on this unusual knowledge. He was elected to lead, not meditate on knowledge while the nation was under sneak attack.

He lacks common sense in an emergency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He failed his oath to protect and defend the this country on 9/11/01.
If that had been Clinton, Republicans would have drawn up articles of impeachment before the dust had settled at the WTC site. And they would have been right to do that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePhilosopher04 Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I picked up on that as well...
I don't recall exactly what he said, but it was something in the order of...He didn't respond because we were already taking care of it...something like that, which was quite telling and Owens quickly tried to explain himself. In a nutshell, Dick Cheney was running the operation while SFB performed a duty more appropriate to his skill level, the reading of MY PET GOAT with a bunch of third graders!!!

LIHOP IMO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I hope someone digs a bit deeper on this one
.. they sound like mighty strange remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. MM answered,
with something like, so we didn't need the president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC