PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:03 PM
Original message |
Did the IBM Selectronic Typewriter have "Proportional Spacing"..... |
|
on it?
Was this an option in the 1970's?
|
lilymidnite
(330 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yes, from personal experience |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:07 PM by enoel2
With a fancy Selectric, in the 1970's
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Here are thumbnails of old ads, from 1935 onward. Links are at the bottom: http://www.etypewriters.com/history.htm
|
zuzu98
(412 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
2. there's a thread here somewhaere |
|
I'll try to find it. It includes an ad from the 40's (I think) touting the proportional spacing.
|
mhr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yes, From The Early Sixties - It Was A Selling Feature And Appeared |
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This has been discussed extensively. There are now (count 'em) 43 threads on DU with the word "proportional" and "spacing" in them from the last 24 hours.
|
xxqqqzme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. yes, worked in a law office & |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:13 PM by rozf
typed many a real property Deed on one. Also made it easier 2 fit names is prescribed spaces. Anyone who worked w/ this 'selectric', had a little plastic box w/ different fonts. U could pick what was needed or as the mood hit U. Had a 'courier' and a 'script' ball is all i can recall but I know that box held about 9 font balls....no probably 6.
|
kskiska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If you're referring to a standard Selectric |
|
I don't remember proportional spacing. However, some models had "dual pitch," which meant the machine could be easily adjusted to use either "Elite" or "Pica" type sizes. Of course, type could be squeezed in if one was to use Pica type with Elite spacing.
The IBM Composer wasn't used as a typewriter. It was a typesetter and much more difficult to use. It wouldn't be used for daily tasks such as a letter.
|
lilymidnite
(330 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. There were custom balls for Selectrics |
|
I think. I had a pile of them in my desk. I typed in Greek and Russian script from time to time. I know there was a ball with a 'th' in superscript. I also used a very fancy Selectric with magnetic cards that you could program to do the dishes if you tried hard enough.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. IBM Composer was used for all tasks at the Pru Annuity area in 67 |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:56 PM by papau
in Newark -if -
If you had a good title, you got "quality"
Proportional spacing was in my Sec workstations Composer typewriter in 69 - The $2500 Selectric had a Times Roman Ball - and Times Roman is defined as proportional - but that Selectric did not really do proportional.
|
MadamImAdam
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Better question: How did it print the "th"? |
|
The superscript "th" in the CBS documents was raised half-way above the typed line (consistent with MS Word, but inconsistent with military typewriters which kept everything in-line to avoid writing outside the pre-printed boxes of standard forms).
See what I mean?
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
It's obvious you didn't see tonight's CBS Evening News broadcast. If you had, you'd have seen them report that other military records released by the White House show the same superscript th. See www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/06/politics/main641481.shtml
|
MadamImAdam
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. I did see it and the "th" was not raised like the TANG docs |
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Your efforts to discredit have fallen flat.
|
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! |
|
*points*
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Nice try.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. raised th was standard in most Selectric's in late 60's. |
|
indeed on the same Guard Forms released by the WH, the th appears NOT raised on one line - and in another entry it appears raised - and the form was filled out in "1969"
|
MadamImAdam
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. Why didn't Rather use the raised example? |
|
That is the simple question. TANG docs had it raised and Rather's example did not. Why didn't he use the proof if it's there?
|
Kathy in Cambridge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Again, you are using information from RW sites that is not CREDIBLE |
|
do some REAL research and we might take you seriously!
|
MadamImAdam
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. I saw it with my own eyes |
|
The "th" example "proving" the CBS assertion was not anything like the TANG docs.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. See the Martin Heidt Feedom of Information Act data that he obtained |
|
There is a boatload of proof there - from our government - that proves raised th and the lower th were used in the same office at the same time in 1969.
|
Kathy in Cambridge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
19. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 08:04 PM by RationalRose
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? :eyes:
|
fsbooks
(350 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
10. the "executive" model had it |
|
My father used one in the 60's. He was working under NOC for the government overseas. They also had paper ribbons to provide crisp type and so that the day's work could be removed and destroyed (everything else kept in the safe.
|
OilemFirchen
(535 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. The Executive was not a Selectric |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 08:00 PM by OilemFirchen
The Executive used a type bar, while the Selectrics used balls.
The Selectric could not do proportional fonts, IIRC. The Executive (and its predecessors) could, because the platen could move in increments of spaces - up to eight, again IIRC. I think the Selectrics could move half-spaces, but I may be wrong. Certainly no finer an increment.
Both the Selectrics and Executive could do sub and postscript. The Selectric could, theoretically, do such with a smaller pitch font if the typist changed balls. The Executive was a fixed-pitch machine, so any super or subscript would be the same pitch as the rest of the document.
That said, it's entirely possible that the Executive had specific keys for ligature characters (it obviously had 1/2, 1/4, etc.) and may have included th, nd, etc.
Moreso, the Executive type bar could be changed, though it was a more daunting task than changing a Selectric ball. I doubt that a secretary would go to the trouble unless it was a requirement. I've read about an attachment of sorts that could hold special characters, but I have my doubts.
I'll stick my neck out and say, conclusively, that the docs are genuine. And my vote goes to an Executive.
Sure do wish someone had one of the beasts and could put this nonsense to rest...
Eddimented fer speelink.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. I agree - I recall it as you have described - you bought special keys in |
|
order to get special characters
|
ochazuke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
22. The Selectric Composer Does It All! |
|
http://www.ibmcomposer.org/docs/Selectric%20Composer%20Operations%20Manual.pdfThe above instruction manual, which was set on the Selectric Composer, can do just about anything MS Word can.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |