Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My ONLY complaint about Kerry last night.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:44 AM
Original message
My ONLY complaint about Kerry last night.
Kerry was given the oppurtunity to clear up the whole voted-for-then-against the 87 billion dollars thing and instead of explaining that there were two separate bill involved, one of which he favors and the other which he did not, he simply said that he had spoken badly or something like that. That was the ONE time that my heart sank a bit. Otherwise, I was really pumped by his performance last night. The rightwing talking heads have abandoned that crap about looking for gestures and gaffes and other "stylistic" points because they know that Bush came off poorly in this regard. NOW they suddenly want to talk about substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody else mentioned that to me.
I will be "reviewing the tape"

If that was his worst moment, we are in VERY good shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I actually disagree totally
Most people wouldn't flat out understand that there were two bills, so why not look humble and kill the issue at the same time? Bush can't run that ad anymore because now he'll just look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. "not flat out understand"????
What's not to understand? There were TWO bills. One that Kerry liked (raising taxes on the rich to pay for the war) and one that he did not like (borrowing the money and driving up the deficit).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. You're overestimating people.
I don't think the average american would get that there are typically multiple versions of the same bill that go through Congress at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. We'll have to agree to disagree here.
I know that there are a lot of stupid people out there but I think that this issue can be explained simply and succinctly. I think that even the dumbest folks out there would come away with a little more information than they would with Kerry basically saying that he mispoke. We've all heard too much of that over the last four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. "I think that even the dumbest folks out there"
Dude, I understand your position on this, but I think you have misunderestimated the depths of stupidity we are dealing with.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I know that some depths are deeper than others...
...but I look at it this way: I for one am pretty dumb. There are some major gaps in my education, especially about government but when the whole "two votes" thing was first explained to me I got it right away. Fuck the ones that are so dumb that they will never understand, it is the ones who DO have the ability to understand but have never had the oppurtunity to hear the explanation that I am thinking of. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Yup...I posted kinda the same thing further down
Any hammering they do on the issue after this will look petty and stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. The other moment for me that I wished for more....
was when * continually stated that the Iraq inspections weren't working, etc, etc - Kerry should have hammered that NO WMD were found - the inspections worked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it was a way to put it behind him...avoids the "making excuses"
charge they would surely level at him.

Admit you're wrong, move forward, and they have nothing to argue about.

Smart move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbwarming Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. He kind of neutralized it early. the emotional issue is the body armor
And JK brought that up long before the 87B came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. MY only regret is that he didn't give bush a karate chop to the neck!
The 87 billion vote was right on and fits his consistent message. I feel he addressed it fine but its not a black and white soundbite thing - it has nuance which the sheeple don't seem to get
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Karate chop would've been nice.
I think it would've shown decisive leadership qualities as well! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. As well as demonstrating that he knows when it is right to use force
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. He should have hit Bush hard for threatening to veto the $87 billion
Edited on Fri Oct-01-04 08:48 AM by xray s
Bush was going to screw our service men and women to protect a tax cut for the super rich and no bid contracts for Halliburton.

I have to agree with you. Kerry had a chance to go for the jugular and take Bush down hard and he missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, I thought the same thing.
He especially could have pointed out that Bush threatened to VETO the funding unless it was under his conditions! That's what I was more disappointed in.

But his performance the rest of the debate more than made up for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AussieDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yes he COULD have expanded on that more...
but I was really waiting for him to use the analogy I first saw on another thread here a few days ago. Congress (and Kerry) gave Bush the keys, but then Bush crashed the car - THAT would have been a telling moment !!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well, I want to be fair (and not criticize)
So far Kerry has shown better judgement than I have. When he's done something I would have criticized, in every case, after calming down I realized his was the more stately (let's say) course. He is extremely astute in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. As I recall
They didn't give him very much time for rebuttal. He probably thought he couldn't adequately explain this to the public in the time frame allotted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC