I'm confused

[alonso_quijano]

Everything I've heard about Bush has led me to believe that's he's the best debater in generations. He's got the common touch and the likability, and he knows how to hammer a point home with just the right zinger! Plus he's got the genius Karl Rove in his corner--I wouldn't want to have to face whatever Rove put up his sleeve, or into his earpiece. Bush is that good a debater: why, I remember the 2000 debates, when Bush was so good that he won even though he lost! Just like the election!

And I know that Kerry can't debate at all! He was supposed to slump across the stage in clown makeup, and start droning on and on about things people don't want to hear, and then say "Whoops, I didn't really mean that! I guess I'm just a big ol' flip-flopper!"

So how is it that the debate I saw last night featured Kerry vivisecting Bush, while ol' Dubya's string-pull was stuck on "terra terra hate us for our freedom"? Were the networks supposed to edit this before broadcast, or something?

[serryjw]

1. I think he truly..........

is at of his element. He may very well of been sedated last night. Before the debate he was anxious and pissy. He never once had a good moment. He just rattled on an on and on...He never said anything, He couldn't have been worse if they tried.