just saw 2 dead kids pulled from the Fallujah rubble on cnn....

[mopaul]

strange, that they would show the actual carnage on the t.v. machine controlled by the white house. thought it was all shiny happy coverage only? oh well, times change.

meanwhile, bush kills babies every day, who had nothing whatsoever to do with nine eleven.

[Cerridwen]

1. Cynical part of me says, Sat. a.m. news, who's watching? n/t

[H2O Man]

9. CNN showed the film clip last night, too.

It was terrible to watch. But our country needs to see it. It just is beyond words, and so it has to be shown on tv.

[trumad]

2. Two dead Kings?

I see another George Clooney Iraq movie in the making here...

Sorry...my bad... I thought you said Kings...

[mopaul]

3. two iraqis that WON'T be fighting us on our own soil.......

....but they have relatives with long memories

[acmavm]

4. You must be mistaken. We only kill adult insurgents with out magic

bullets and bombs. They must have been midgets.

[rooboy]

5. To be politically correct, they weren't kids...

they were suspected Al Qaeda terrorist hiding out in a safe house. That makes it ok. :puke:

[Elidor]

6. "Why should I waste my bee-yoo-ti-ful mind..."

"So some kids died. Phhht! At least we brought them democracy. Ungrateful little savages."

:cry:

[madrchsod]

7. they were not kids mopaul

they were insurgents-i just heard this on npr-100 insurgents killed today....

[bread_and_roses]

8. Why Why WHY

won't Kerry use what is actually happening in Iraq to attack the megalomaniac murderers in the WH and their feeble puppet front? Why, during the debate, did he not reference the dead children and the legacy of hate we are creating AS WELL AS the 2000+ attacks on "coalition" forces over the past weeks? WHY did he not reference the President of Jordan saying it is impossible to hold elections in Iraq due to the carnage, or whoever it was the other day who said flat out Iraq is lost?

I realize that most Americans don't seem to care how many Iraqis die, and I understand that Kerry is in a difficult position due to his past acts and statements. I realize that he can't be seen as not "supporting the troops" but why not use these things in his attack on the CONDUCT of the war?

If the media starts showing footage of enough dead children, surely the American people will turn against this evil war. Surely most do not want to send our sons and daughters, our husbands and wives off to bomb children?

[tedzbear]

11. Because he's going to be doing the same thing if he wins...

...he'll just use more bombs and troops (hopefully French and German ones).

[peekaloo]

10. those kids were faking their injuries....they hope to be President

of Iraq someday.

A free Iraq will make the world safer....or is it a safe Iraq will make the world freer.

Catastrophic success.

:-(

[BlueNomad]

12. They weren't faking

They were asleep. Don't you sleep in rubble?

[Jacobin]

13. Hey, it's 'hard work' (tm) killing babies

Smirk just wants to show that to his base.

[grasswire]

14. I saw part of that last night

One was a little boy about five years old. Buried under rocks and rubble. Absolutely limp and lifeless when they pulled him out. Poor little tyke. I wonder how many other pieces of film will never be seen.