2004 Nobel Prize in Physics to 3 US scientists

[Stockholm]

5 October 2004

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2004 "for the discovery of asymptotic freedom in the theory of the strong interaction" jointly to

David J. Gross
Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA,

H. David Politzer
California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Pasadena, USA, and

Frank Wilczek
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA.

A 'colourful' discovery in the world of quarks
What are the smallest building blocks in Nature? How do these particles build up everything we see around us? What forces act in Nature and how do they actually function?

This year's Nobel Prize in Physics deals with these fundamental questions, problems that occupied physicists throughout the 20th century and still challenge both theoreticians and experimentalists working at the major particle accelerators.

David Gross, David Politzer and Frank Wilczek have made an important theoretical discovery concerning the strong force, or the 'colour force' as it is also called. The strong force is the one that is dominant in the atomic nucleus, acting between the quarks inside the proton and the neutron. What this year's Laureates discovered was something that, at first sight, seemed completely contradictory. The interpretation of their mathematical result was that the closer the quarks are to each other, the weaker is the 'colour charge'. When the quarks are really close to each other, the force is so weak that they behave almost as free particles. This phenomenon is called ”asymptotic freedom”. The converse is true when the quarks move apart: the force becomes stronger when the distance increases. This property may be compared to a rubber band. The more the band is stretched, the stronger the force.

This discovery was expressed in 1973 in an elegant mathematical framework that led to a completely new theory, Quantum ChromoDynamics, QCD. This theory was an important contribution to the Standard Model, the theory that describes all physics connected with the electromagnetic force (which acts between charged particles), the weak force (which is important for the sun's energy production) and the strong force (which acts between quarks). With the aid of QCD physicists can at last explain why quarks only behave as free particles at extremely high energies. In the proton and the neutron they always occur in triplets.

Thanks to their discovery, David Gross, David Politzer and Frank Wilczek have brought physics one step closer to fulfilling a grand dream, to formulate a unified theory comprising gravity as well – a theory for everything.

http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/2004/

[RivetJoint]

1. Congratulations to three BRILLIANT scientists!

I can't even begin to imagine how smart these guys are!

[Dudley_DUright]

2. Dang

I did not win the Nobel Prize AGAIN this year. :-( Actually a very good choice by the Nobel committee. QCD and "asymptotic freedom" explain why we have never been able to detect free individual quarks (with their fractional charges). Nice job David^2 & Frank!

[Stockholm]

3. Good for them, but...

I am mostly waiting for Horace Engdahl to announce the (IMHO) most important prize for literature!

This years favourite is Ali Ahmad Said (a.k.a. Adonis - take that repug racists) and Joyce Carol Oates but I believe it is time for Tomas Tranströmer (Swedish poet) to finally win. Tranströmer has been nominated before and I strongly recommend his works.

Well, we will probably find out day after tomorrow (if the Academy feels like it...)

[Dudley_DUright]

4. More information at the following links

For the general public:

http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/2004/public.html

For Experts:

http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/2004/phyadv04.pdf

[baldguy]

5. With a few more years of Republican education policies...

We won't need to be bothered things like Nobel Prizes.

[captainjack]

6. I hope those are not the last few American scientists to win the Nobel

with Bush's backward science policy, it is likely that much funding will be taken out of basic research and poured over into militiary/applied science research- and those don't generally win Nobels(IBM/Lucent's research arms have won a few, but most go to academic researchers...)