CONCLUSIVE PROOF Iraq had no WMD's just prior to our invasion...

[arbusto_baboso]

Okay, I AM inferring it from circumstantial evidence, actually, but you'll have to agree this is pretty compelling.

Back in '80 ('81?) Israel bombed an Iraqi nuclear reactor which was about to come on-line. The Israelis don't tolerate the existence of things near them which would present such a huge threat to their national security.

Consequently, right now, everyone is worried that Israel will take some sort of preemptive action against Iran and its nuclear program.

Sooooooo, if Israel has a record of doing this, so much so that most nations worry about them doing it again in Iran, then where were they before the US invasion of Iraq? Wouldn't you think if Iraq possessed WMD's of any sort capable of hitting and harming Israel, that the IDF would've made some decisive strikes??? After all, the Mossad, for all its flaws, is STILL a better intel agency than anything WE'VE got, and Sharon is NOT afraid to "project power"....

[Jokinomx]

1. Yep...

I agree.... everytime you look into the situation seriously, you can only come to one conclusion Chimp should be arrested and put on trial for war crimes.

:toast:

[lefador]

2. The irony of it all was...

.... that Iraq did not have a nuclear program before the attack, they started seeking nuke capabilities AFTER that attack. It was one of Israel's biggest fuck ups to date.

[Lydia Leftcoast]

3. Here's the conclusive proof that Iraq had no WMDs:

when their country was attacked, they had no WMDs to use against our forces.

If they had them, don't you think they would have used them when their country was being attacked? If not then, when?

[arbusto_baboso]

4. Good point!