there hasn't been another attack since 9-11, therefore.....

[mopaul]

...therefore, that proves that bushkkko is protecting america!

..therefore, it proves that bushkkko DID 9-11, and THAT'S why there hasn't been another attack, to give the illusion that we were attacked by arabs, and we're safe from them under bushkkko.

...therefore, if Kerry gets the white house, bushkkko goes for the second terror attack blamed on muslims, blames Kerry for failing to protect america and impeaching him.

the bushkkko administration is full of killers. no joke. killing multiple thousands of innocent people to get their way is nothing to them. be they muslims or americans. nothing.

[Arancaytar]

1. Re: "blames Kerry for failing to protect america and impeaching him."

It's never over, is it?

[mmonk]

2. How about

there never was a terrorist strike in the US until bush?!

[snippy]

3. . . . Bush hasn't needed another attack yet. n/t

[knowbody0]

4. humans are disposable commodities to them

truth will either die or explode

[Burma Jones]

5. Noooooo, I started buying knit Boxer Shorts in October 2001

and THAT's why. My Boxers also keep Tigers out of Africa.

[BOSSHOG]

6. If Clinton, Gore or Kerry had been President on 9/11

There would not have been a terrorist attack, because Clinton, Gore and Kerry did not need a terrorist attack.

Just what is in dick cheney's energy task force report? Maybe some American loving conservative can tell us. Oh, I'm sorry, conservative don't love America. I knew that.

[Fleshdancer]

7. I'm glad that domestic terrorism by non Muslims no longer counts

I would hate to have a war on terror that deals with ALL forms of terrorism. That would be tiresome.



:grr: