caledesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 01:47 PM
Original message |
Killer question from Edwards to Cheney...(the experience thing) |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 01:49 PM by caledesi
Edwards: Mr. Cheney do you know the number of innocent Iraqis that have been killed in this "war?"
Cheney: "uh, we don't count those casualties."
Edwards: "Sir, there were XXXX number of innocent Iraqis killed since the announcement from Pres. Bush* that the major conflict is over. AND YOU ARE SAYING I AM THE INEXPERIENCED ONE?
As VP, your answer should be on the tip of your tongue."
What do you think?
edit: usual
|
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Cheney will lie and make up a low number |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 01:50 PM by genius
However, Edwards should point out the number
|
knowbody0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. edward's lack of experience |
|
as a politician render him less contaminated
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Great statement, but remember.... |
|
a good lawyer never asks a question that he doesn't know the answer to before he asks it. If I were Cheney and was asked that question, I would answer it! What if I said 5,496? Edwards has no way to refute that (that I know of). Even if Edwards said, no, you're wrong, it was 13,538, neither guy has a way to verify their number.
|
caledesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yes, this idea was based on Edwards knowing the exact amount. nt |
nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. and NO ONE knows that number.... n/t |
caledesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. concede. Maybe not the exact number, but how about an |
sweetheart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Shadow government and the constitution |
|
"Sir, you are sworn to defend and protect the constitution, correct? Please explain your role in the shadow government that has no provision under law? <treason to subvert>"
"Sir, you are the CEO of halliburton, who has gotten nobid contracts from your government." Why have you not informed the american people of your gross conflict of interest?
"Sir, you can't stand up today because of your poor heart condition. Clearly, you are not capable of serving as president due to the possibility of your imminent death at any point. What makes that any different for VP?"
"Sir, you have lied repeatedly about connections between saddam and al queda without proffering any evidence. Since you've used this reasoning to murder 1000's of people, it is time you came clean."
I'm sure edwards has better ones... :-)
|
Elbowroom
(257 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
mention Cheney's voting record when it comes to defense systems.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |