Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Keeps Voter In The Dark (Top 25 Censored Stories) - Progressive Pop

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 02:59 PM
Original message
Media Keeps Voter In The Dark (Top 25 Censored Stories) - Progressive Pop
As the general election approaches, Project Censored notes the stories the corporate media failed to tell

By Peter Phillips and Kate Sims

<snip>

Election 2004 is a serious test of democracy in the United States. Perhaps no other time since the 1930s have we been so dangerously close to institutionalized totalitarianism. No-fly lists, prison torture, domestic spying, mega-homeland security agencies, suspension of habeas corpus, global unilateralism, and military adventurism interlocked with corporate profit-taking are all spurred on by a media-induced citizen paranoia.

Corporate media are in the entertainment business and fail to cover important news stories voters need to make election decisions. We need information about our country's leaders. These are the people making decisions that impact all of our lives. We need to know who our leaders are and what they are doing. What are their backgrounds, their motivations? What policies and laws are they enacting? What actions are they undertaking, with or against our consent? We don't need to like them, but we do need to know about them. A participatory democracy needs people to be aware of issues. We need active engaged voters. Unfortunately close to 50% of us will not vote in the upcoming election.

Project Censored at Sonoma State University in California has just released its annual list of the most important news stories not covered by the corporate media in the USA (www.projectcensored.org). Might citizens be more interested in voting if they know that wealth inequality was rapidly increasing in the US, and that the top 5% of the people have gotten richer and the rest of us poorer in the past five years? Which presidential candidate would be most helpful in reversing this trend? Most of us won't know if the corporate media doesn't tell us the story.

<snip>

Link (with details on each story): http://www.populist.com/04.18.censored.html

From: http://www.populist.com/

**************************************************************************

The Top 25 Censored Stories

#1 Wealth Inequity in 21st Century Threatens Economy and Democracy.

#2 Ashcroft vs. the Human Rights Law that Holds Corporations Accountable.

#3 Bush Administration Manipulates Science and Censors Scientists.

# 4 High Uranium Levels Found in Troops and Civilians.

#5 The Wholesale Giveaway of Our Natural Resources.

#6 The Sale of Electoral Politics.

#7 Conservative Organization Drives Judicial Appointments.

#8 Secrets of Cheney's Energy Task Force Come to Light.

#9 Widow Brings RICO Case Against US Government for 9/11.

#10 New Nuke Plants: Taxpayers Support, Industry Profits.

#11 Media Can Legally Lie.

#12 The Destabilization of Haiti.

#13 Schwarzenegger Met with Enron's Ken Lay Before the California Recall.

#14 New Bill Threatens Intellectual Freedom.

#15 US Develops Lethal New Bio-weapon Viruses.

# 16 Law Enforcement Agencies Spy on Innocent Citizens.

#17 US Government Represses Labor Unions in Iraq in Quest for Business Privatization.

#18 Media and Government Ignore Dwindling Oil Supplies.

#19 Global Food Cartel Fast Becoming the World's Supermarket.

#20 Extreme Weather Prompts New Warning from UN.

#21 Forcing a World Market for GMOs.

#22 Exporting Censorship to Iraq.

#23 Brazil Opposes US-style FTAA agreements, But Provides Little Comfort for the Poor of South America.

#24 Reinstating the Draft.

#25 Wal-Mart Brings Inequity and Low Prices to the World.

**************************************************************************

Ya know what??? I think we've covered every one of these suckers here at DU!!!

We rock, the media sucks, what else can ya say?

Hey DU !!! :yourock:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Umm... So... You Guys Already Saw This, Correct ???
LOL!!!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is known,
but it's nice to have sources that point to specifics. Thanks for the links!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent find -- thanks for posting
These are very scary times. I don't know what's more chilling, the 25 topics I just read or the fact that nobody (officially speaking) is talking about any of this.

I would nominate as the 26th a story posted by swag here on DU yesterday:

"There is no legislative process any more" - report on GOP Congress

Back-room dealing a Capitol trend
GOP flexing its majority power
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff | October 3, 2004

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/10/03/b...

WASHINGTON -- Dismayed that the technology company Accenture had located its headquarters in Bermuda, thereby avoiding paying hundreds of millions of dollars in US taxes, the House Appropriations Committee voted 35-17 this summer to strip the firm of a $10 billion Homeland Security contract.

It was a rare moment of bipartisan agreement and an important victory for those who decry corporate tax loopholes. But it didn't last long. The Rules Committee, the all-powerful gatekeeper of the Republican leadership, prevented the measure from reaching the House floor. In a further show of its power to pick and choose what the full House can vote on, the Rules Committee allowed the House to vote on a ban on future Homeland Security contracts to overseas companies -- but let the $10 billion flow to Accenture, which spent $2 million last year lobbying the government.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2448673
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You Are Most Welcome !!! - And Thank You !!!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I knew investigative journalism was dead when
undergrad college students were responsible for having death sentences overturned in IL, mostly because nobody else was trying.

Any one of those 25 topics if tackled by an eager, if even halfway talented reporter, would result in a really juicy story, possibly some professional recognition, but most importantly the kind of attention that would spark public outrage and meaningful change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Excellent Point !!!
That never occurred to me, but you are exactly right!!!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ah, Willy
you smooth talker, you. :evilgrin: ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Suh...Mooooooooch !!!
:loveya:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. That WAS Investigative Journalism
Those students were graduate journalism students! I get your point, but obviously, investigative journalism is NOT dead! It's just being done by students.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. What good is investigative journalism...
...done by students without a universal outlet for the resultant stories?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm Not Arguing That Point
The original point was that investigative journalism was dead. But, those students' investigative journalism got some innocent people off death row! There is some good in that, right?

I was suggesting that it can't be dead when the very example used to declare it dead proved it wasn't.

And, the outlet for those students obviously did exist, or those innocent men would still be on death row.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I guess what I was trying to convey, but didn't
Edited on Wed Oct-06-04 11:21 AM by Monica_L
is that once these journalists graduate, they will be unable to practice what they learned in school.

THe whole IL DP scandal only came to light because these students consistently were able to uncover enough evidence to have wrongful convictions overturned and David Protess had enough clout to get their work into the mainstream press. Otherwise, we'd still be in the dark about these things and a lot of innocent people in IL would be dead.

ON edit: I'm sure IL was not the only state with this problem. Where were the follow-ups? The other states' post-conviction reviews? When James Liebman's study came out showing that in the past 25 years, nationwide, the reversible error rate in capital cases was something like 70%, it was largely ignored. I can remember a time when a finding that dramatic would have been big news. Except in legal circles, it sank with hardly a ripple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Great Point
Yeah, you're right. I guess it isn't dead, it's just on commercially viable life support.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-05-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. you may have to post this tomorrow, willyt
Edited on Tue Oct-05-04 10:12 PM by noiretblu
:kick: debate-mania tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hey Blu, How Are Ya !!!
:bounce::loveya::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. i'm alive...
and struggling to make ends meet :7 how about you? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. 'Bout The Same As You !!!
There's a rumor we might all get together before the election. You up for that???

:bounce::loveya::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. i'm up for it...just keep me posted
i have a lot going on right now, so i'm not always around here :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. #26 Prime Minister of Iraq "Iyad Allawi" blindfolded and shot
prisoners in the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. PERFECT Addition To The List !!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't know how you people can be cheerful with that gloomy information
Wow, we are losing our rights literally daily.. I just cannot understand how can repukes not care about their rights and still vote for Bush.

Seem that repukes don't mind to be ignorant people. anyway, after read these 25 censors, I got more depressing. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. *kick*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC