So, Shrubco says that it's enough that Sadam wanted WMD's?

[No2W2004]

Saddam didn't have any WMDs, but he wanted them. And because he wanted to posess those weapons, Shrubco was justified in invading Iraq.

I want to have sex with Angelina Jolie. So can Shrubco have me locked up as a threat?

[Sparkly]

1. It's also that someday, sanctions might have been lifted

and then he could have gotten the materials to make the weapons to threaten us with.

[progressivejazz]

4. and so we had to attack NOW.

That makes sense. To morons.

[No2W2004]

6. That still doesn't justify going to war

years or even decades before that could even remotely begin to happen.

[asjr]

2. Oh my! Was he on again today? Sadaam wanted the weapons

but N. Korea already has them. Is he going to invade N.Korea? No, he is scared silly of them. Lies and bluster invaded Iraq.

[bloom]

3. "They" are delusional.

And "they" call us naive.

This is new low in reasons for war. Bush might as say there is no reason - just felt like it.

[mzmolly]

5. My that leaves the "preemptive strike" door wiiiide open now doesn't it?

:eyes:

[kayell]

7. We went to WAR for thoughtcrime??!!

[TahitiNut]

8. The opinions of the Busholini Cabal don't count. They're War Criminals!

We might as well judge Hitler on his opinion of himself! :puke:

[Malva Zebrina]

9. He and Cheney are trying to justify it by any excuse whatsoever

you can bet his team of lawyers is behind the twenty or so different excuses--he is scared to death someone is going to prosecute him for war crimes. I wish for a John Dean clone in the White House.

[hlthe2b]

10. right now more than 50% of Americans probably want their own WMDs!