Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it now politically correct to call it "Iraqgate"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:19 PM
Original message
Is it now politically correct to call it "Iraqgate"?
If poor Dan Rather has to have Rathergate then Bush/Cheney can have Iraqgate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps the "gate" thing is a bit old...
(like about 30 years), but what the hell, they deserve a "gate." "Iraqgate" it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. As Bob Schiffer said on TDS: the gatekeepers dole these out
John Stewart asked a similar question wondering why say Abu Grahib didn't get a gate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Iraqgate/Iraqnam whatever it is a shit storm that much is certain.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's already an Iraqgate -- Poppy's
Just Google "Iraqgate" and see.

And "-gate" has become too trivialized anyway. Call it what it is ... a fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. There already was an Iraqgate
It had to do with Bush Sr. arming Iraq before the Gulf War. It doesn't get mentioned much these days, but if you Google on that term you'll find out plenty. See, for example:

http://www.fair.org/extra/9505/iraqgate.html
http://www.webcom.com/~lpease/collections/hidden/iraqgate.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thank you for the great links.....Why isn't this EVER mentioned?
Oh, that's right, Washington insiders decided that Iraqgate didn't happen and besides, it's "ancient history". I feel like screaming!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Plus plenty of British involvement
remember the 'supergun'?

http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/1996/223/223p22.htm
A murky coda has been the assassination, by persons unknown, of people investigating the arms trade or likely to reveal inside information. Gerald Bull, arms dealer and inventor of the "super gun", was assassinated in Belgium in a 1990 professional hit.

A 28-year-old British journalist, Jonathan Moyles, was killed in Santiago, Chile, the day after interviewing arms dealer Carlos Cardoen. Cardoen had been involved in selling Iraq 50 Bell helicopters containing the ultra-sophisticated Helos guidance system, illegally exported from Britain.

Andre Cools, former deputy prime minister of Belgium, was murdered in 1991, shortly after being asked to investigate Belgian involvement with Iraqi arms deals. Speculation still surrounds the death of British Tory MP Stephen Milligan in 1994, apparently the victim of self-imposed bizarre sexual practices. According to some insiders, the MP, who worked for the Defence Ministry, was killed for asking too many questions about arms trade corruption.
...
Sir Richard Scott is, as he admits, "a member of the establishment myself". His report doesn't accuse ministers of lying, but suggests that their public statements and accounts to the inquiry are, variously, "specious, unfortunate, untrue, bizarre, uninformative, duplicitous, misleading, insubstantial" and -- not surprisingly -- "unconvincing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Something along these lines was brought up by Jon Stewart last night.
He asked his guest Bob Scheiffer why there hasn't been any "gates" with this administration, considering all of the mismanagement that's gone on. Scheiffer's tongue-in-cheek answer was, "Perhaps we need to talk to the Gatekeeper."

Stewart also pointed out the irony of impeaching a president for a "blue dress" issue compared to the crimes of this administration that have been grossly neglected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. OH, FOR SURE!!!
Cal it Iraqgate! Chimp loves "gates", as he loves OB/GYNs!


From a 2000 speech:


Bush Called for “Meaningful” Patient Bill of Rights. “Unlike Washington, D.C., where people want to fight, where people want to fight each other, we work together. We set aside our differences and do what’s right for the state of Texas. Unlike Washington, D.C., that wants to finger-point and argue and pit one group of people against another, we’ve come together to enact a real, meaningful patient bill of rights that says to our citizens you’ve got access to your doctor, that says to ladies you can bypass a gatekeeper to go see your OB-GYN.”






http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:4nwMz1hnuToJ:blog.johnkerry.com/rapidresponse/archives/001956.html+bush+ob+gyn+2000+campaign&hl=en
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think Iraq is way worse than a "gate".
this calls for a new word denoting a larger disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think it may make the point, as nothing else -- even though...
other "gates" have not led to wars whose cost has been lives. Good idea --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. There's already been one "Iraqgate" in the Bush family.
It's a little remembered Great America 'gate, referring to the revelation in the early 90s of the illegal arming of Iraq by the Reagan/Bush administrations.

The Iraqgate Scandal
http://www.parascope.com/articles/1196/iraq1.htm

Bush Administration Uses CIA To Stonewall Iraqgate Investigation
http://www.mediafilter.org/MFF/BushCIAstonewall.html

Shredded Justice
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1993/01/pizzo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Wow........I appreciate all this info!!
The Mother Jones article telling about the shredded documents and the 5.5 billion in taxpayer loans to Iraq is amazing. That sure was hushed up....let's bring it out in the open now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Iraqnam has been making the rounds lately
and is rather apropos to the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC