Selwynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 11:13 AM
Original message |
Welcome to this mornings reality check: |
|
Todays reality check:
Open agression against another country without provocation is a crime. Those who do so are sent to Nuremberg to stand trial...
Unless your the president of the united states.
Simply not "liking" another country or having another country not "like" you, is no a justifable defense for open agression.
Unles your are the president of the united states.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The US is an outlaw nation. |
|
The government is headed by war criminals.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. You don't need to qualify them as "war" criminals. |
|
They are criminals in every other way as well.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Morally and ethically, yes. |
|
It begs the question, however, whether those who are empowered to legislate (enact laws) in a manner that permits their own predatory and exploitative behavior are really 'law breakers' (criminals).
That we're subject to international laws, by treaty and Constitutional applicability of such treaties, seems less arguable.
|
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Having thoughts about doing something bad |
|
is the same as actually doing something bad, and warrants occupation of your country.
Unless you are the president of the United States.
Killing innocent women and children is bad.
Unless you are the president of the United States.
|
JohnnyRingo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Ahhh... the REAL reason Buxh backed out of the International Court. |
|
Rumsfeld would look SO at home in a war trial
|
immoderate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
5. But they were thinking about ending the sanctions... |
|
...an immediate threat.
--IMM
|
JNelson6563
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think of Bush as the Un-President. He's a usurper who stole the WH with a list of things to accomplish. You don't think a few rules were going to stop things up do you?
Julie
|
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
8. We're not big on reality.. |
|
...here in the US. Or...he who controls the most gold and the presses controls 'reality'.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
9. 'But we live in a new type of world'... |
|
:eyes:
Bush's justification for all of the lawbending and breaking is 9/11. He's pimping it as if there's no tomorrow!
Other counties attacked have to abide by the rules. Japan and Spain seem to be. Why can't we?
|
Zhade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-09-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Indeed. Worthy of a kick. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message |