Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reagan coming to $10.00 bill after all -- you heard it here first.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:42 PM
Original message
Reagan coming to $10.00 bill after all -- you heard it here first.
From the October 12th issue of "Numismatic News." (Hard copy, no link. Sorry.)

A new $10 will be unveiled in spring 2005 and enter circulation a year from now. The $100 will also be redesigned, but it was bumped from the schedule by the $10 and a new timetable has yet to be established for the top demomination.

The $100.00 was redesigned first back in 1996 because it was (and still is) the most often counterfeited denomination overseas. The $20.00 is the most often counterfeited here in the U.S., and that's why it led last time. Both times, the first bill was followed by the $50.00.

Last time around, the $10.00 was the last to be redesigned, and released at the same time as the $5.00. They've announced that there will be no redesign to the $1.00, $2.00, or $5.00 this time around.

As little as two weeks ago, the $100.00 was still slated to be the next redesigned, and work was underway on it. The decision to do the $10.00 next was a surprise announcement.

My prediction? Bush knows he's going to lose, and is going to make sure that he takes advantage of the one shot he's going to get to honor the patron saint of the Frothing Right. The Reagan $10.00 bill is dying in Congress, which could very well be completely Democratic-controlled by this time next year. The Reagan dime effort has also died. The last way that a change can be done is an order from the Treasury Secretary.

Thus, I'll bet that Bush has given the order from on high. Prepare a portrait of Reagan for the new $10.00. Shortly after Election Day, a press release from Treasury will announce that the new $10.00 will have Reagan's portrait on it, and then it will be too late to make any more changes until the next round of currency redesign, slated for 2010.

Who knows? They may go for broke and have Treasury Secretary Snow order designs prepared for a 2005 Reagan dime, too, since he'll have control of Treasury until January 20th. If he orders that, by law the design cannot be changed until 2030.

Mark my words. Reagan money is coming whether Americans want it or not. Bush is going to push it through the back door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
951 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. I don't care what president we have as long as he kills alot of people
...before they kill us.
:WTF:

If they can put that senile grey asshole on a $10 bill I want Clinton on the $20 Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dzimbowicz Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
49. I cannot resist this one...
Did Strom Thurmond bequeath his hair dye to chimpie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. HAHAHA!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt it
You're worrying over nothing. All they'll do is add colour to the $10 bill. If the president were to bypass a Democratic Congress to get something like this done, they'd strike back quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's the thing....
He won't really be bypassing Congress. The bill was never voted down -- it actually never came up for a vote. Neither did the Reagan dime legislation.

Barring direct intervention by Congress -- which has never been done in the case of paper money and only six times in the case of coins (the bills that gave us the Washington quarter, Kennedy Half, Susan B. Anthony and Sacagawea Dollars, Statehood Quarters, and Lewis & Clark nickels -- the Treasury Secretary has total control over the designs on money. In the case of coins, the Mint Act of 1892 ensures that any design selected by a Treasury Secretary cannot (without an act of Congress) be replaced for 25 years. Not even an executive order from President Kerry could do it.

It wouldn't be illegal, and if he's already lost, he's not going to care about the backlash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
46. You're thinking of the Act of September 26, 1890
which set the minimum time of 25 years for a coin design. However, the law was violated early on, when the Barber designs were discontinued after a 24-year run for the dime and quarter (1892-1916), and a 23-year run for the half dollar (1892-1915). But you are right that while subsequent designs have been replaced before their 25 years were up (Standing Liberty 25c, Franklin 50c, Eisenhower $1, Anthony $1), they were replaced after an act of Congress. And as you noted, the Treasury Secretary can change designs at his discretion after the 25-year period, but he will nearly certainly bend to the will of the president if the president wants to change the designs (a la Theodor Roosevelt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. That;s the act.
And the Barber designs were minted for 25 years. 1892 through 1916 is 25 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. No, the Barber 10c and 25c designs were only 24 years old
when they were replaced (1916-1892= 24). According to noted numismatic researcher Walter Breen, the Secretary of the Treasury got around that age restriction by claiming that the new designs were for "fiscal 1917" (which began on July 1, 1916). That is why there are both the Barber and new designs for the dime and quarter in that year.

But the Barber half was ended in 1915 (no 1916's were made of that design) and replaced with the Walking Liberty half in 1916, so no matter how you calculate its age, it was still below the 25-year threshold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. A link can be read here:
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 03:48 PM by HypnoToad
http://www.theorator.com/bills108/hr4528.html

And I will scribble certain things on every bill that has his face on it. The man who gave us the initial debt, made friends with those who are now our current enemies (so what did we do to piss them off?), and screw the working class royally (without lube) at the same time?


Much more here:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=%2410+bill+redesign&btnG=Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. People's likenesses can't be on stamps until
they've been dead for ten years.

But I just recalled that the Roosevelt dime was issued fairly soon after he died, and the Kennedy half dollar was also minted within a couple of years of Kennedy's assassination.

But Reagan on U.S. currency? He's nowhere near the stature of anyone else who's on U.S. currency (except possibly Salmon P. Chase, who is on the $10,000 bill.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No such law in the case of money.
A number of living or recently-deceased people have appeared on paper money. There is no restriction on it.

There is a tradition against using living people on coins, but there have been exceptions. Calvin Coolidge, Sen. Joseph Robinson, and Eunice Kennedy Shriver have all appeared on coins while they were alive.

The Roosevelt dime came out in 1946 -- less than a year after his death. Kennedy died November 22, 1963, and the first Kennedy halves rolled off the presses on January 2, 1964.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. "May I have two $5 bills instead? I don't accept fascists on my money."
Otherwise, I'll put a big red & black swastika on every one I get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paxdora Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I will REFUSE any $10 bills with Reagan's mug on it!
I will ask for 2 fives or 10 ones in lieu of the
NaziRepublican's $10 bill! Shit, I'll even take coins instead!

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I agree.
2-5s please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Thank You I refuse to accept a Reagan bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:38 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Paxdora Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. How come you don't know...
what a Freeper is???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Paxdora Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. "Scared" of your opinions???
ROTFL! Everyone here has different opinions, and voices them all the time without fear. You had your say, and I had mine. No big deal, chum....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
951 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Yes
I guess you forgot your own post well let me remind you:




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You mean to tell me that if they put his face on a bill you would refuse it?

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah


Are u a child?




hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha




sorry...I just can't believe this..



They could put Frankenstein on my money and I would still use it..

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Now beat it freeper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. If I'm not mistaken, you did the same.
You asked if a poster was a "child," suggesting immaturity.

A mild one, but a personal attack, nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I pointed out a flaw in your logic.
Standard debate technique.

Your taking it personally. Not good, in debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. Gone already
And I never even had a chance to say goodbye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paxdora Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. If I want $10 dollars in a different format...
I am not turning down $10 dollars; anyone has the right to ask for two $5 dollar bills, ten $1 bills, or four pieces of fake 'silver' coins(quarters). I don't have to carry Reagan's ugly puss around with me in my wallet if I don't want to when I can have the same amount of money in a different way. Get it, Hamid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yes ... it is entertaining.
Each day, I see certain Americans getting more and more desperate to support point of view that is collasping around them. A creaking structure with a hollow core, and rotting walls.

They get angrier and angrier, exposing even more transparent passive/agressive mannerisms. The proverbial "ton of bricks" is about to crush them, and still they wallow in the illusion of self-importance. The level of denial is astounding.

To witness is somewhat sad, but oh so entertaining.

Know anyone like that, Hamid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. I wouldn't have a problem with frankenstein on the 10 bill
Reagan I do have a problem with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
48. hey abid..
If people don't want to use it, it goes out (there are very few places you'll find sacajawea's dollar outside the post office)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
58. This was exactly my thought!
If it happens, I won't accept any $10 bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Imagine the "creative expression" possibilities ...
of having the face of Ronald Reagan on currency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaSea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. It'll be woth getting rubber stamps made
with links to Iran-contra details and sooo much more.

If that comes to pass, they'll be very sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Yep.
Any time a Reagan bill comes into your possession, just rubber stamp it with a link to one of the "Truth About Reagan" sites.

What would we do with the dime if they put him on it? Paint them a different color?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. I will not have a reagun bill in my
care..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. I will never have that bill in my possession.
I will never accept one as change either. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavanaghjam Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. shameless
This is the same guy who named a US Navy ship after his daddy. A ship built with taxpayer dollars. And the silence in the media was deafening. These people have no shame. Putting Reagan above Hamilton in history? Good God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. nope
The Treasury issued a press release last week confirming that the 10 is a getting a color change, but also confirmed there are no plans to put Reagan on it.

You heard the ZOMBY TROOF here first, and not one tinfoiler has ever been right going up against me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. Thanks Zomby. Alexander Hamilton is my hero. I love $10 bills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. I hope you are right.
But why force through the redesign of the $10? No one counterfeits 10's.

I personally think it's time to redesign all of our money and get all the politicians off of it. Let's see some famous poets, painters, inventors, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthbetold Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. UGH.
Must. Suppress. Vomit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny 99 Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. If I'm not mistaken
Changing money requires an act of Congress, yes? Even if the Treasury Secretary unveils a new design, it still would take Congress to approve it.

Now, if they want to take that drunken dipshit Grant off of the $50, we can talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavanaghjam Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
43. At least Grant accomplished something
with his life, more than a few B movies. As Lincoln said when told Grant was drinking too much, "Find out what kind of whiskey he's drinking and send some to my other generals."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murdoch Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. At least Nancy Reagan had the good sense...
...to say that the Reagan-on-money thing was not something she wanted. And her son is all over the air denouncing Bush Jr., I wonder what she thinks. Even Pat Buchanan is saying invading Iraq was ridiculous, and that the US military deployment around the world should be decreased. He may want to do so because he sees everything as a Jewish conspiracy, but I'd rather do the right thing for the wrong reason than the wrong thing with supposed good intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
44. I will draw horns on that evil f***ing face
indeed I will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demforall Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
47. wow!
Who is the last Democrat on our money? I wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Kennedy.
Kennedy was the last Democrat added to our money. He went on the Half Dollar in 1964.

Before that, it was FDR on the dime in 1946. And before THAT, Woodrow Wilson on the $100,000.00 in 1929.

Eisenhower was the last Republican added to money, added to the dollar in 1971.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
54. Why would he do that?
Edited on Sun Oct-10-04 04:15 PM by neebob
I thought the Bushes didn't like the Reagans. Either way, it would be fun writing stuff like "I had Alzheimer's while I was in office" and "Guess what? I had nothing to do with the breakup of the Soviet Union" and "Buy Boraxo!" and "More blush!" on the bills. Glass half full here.

"Help me, Mummy! I keep getting stuck in a cash register."
"Mr. Gorbachev, tip that cab driver!"
"Mr. Gorbachev, pick up that dry cleaning!"

Now I think I'll be disappointed if it doesn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
55. If St Ronnie the Racist shows up on any bill I own,
I'll have a great time defacing it for the shear injoyment of telling the truth about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
57. I think that if the Republicans want to put Reagan's portrait on a bill
they should, at least, award him a denomination reminiscent of his policies and accomplishments --- The three dollar bill comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullshot Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
59. Geez, they've already named half of the highways,
a major airport and a bunch of buildings after him.

Republicans are so adamant about getting Reagan's name or image on so many things. I think it was the late columnist Mike Royko who noted that the Republicans are quick to do this, because, what president have they had to hang their hat on during the past 100-150 years?

Nixon? Yeah right. Eisenhower was a great general, but his presidency was considered milquetoast. Herbert Hoover and Calvin Coolidge are associated with the Great Depression. Warren Harding's presidency was marred with scandals, mistresses and a questionable death (food poisoning - by his wife?). There's Abe Lincoln, but Royko pointed out that the rednecks and bigots in the Republican party have a hard time associating themselves with a president credited with ending slavery (or words to that effect).

So, in spite of the record deficit spending, the military lapses under his watch and the myths that came with his presidency, Republicans want to latch on to someone, ANYONE and make him into some kind of mythical god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
60. I will NEVER accept a $10 bill again, if this becomes true.
Edited on Mon Oct-11-04 08:41 AM by TankLV
And I will LOUDLY state my reasons for doing so.

I will not accept something that honors a piece of excrement and a criminal.

On edit:

But it WOULD be fun to get a chance to "improve" on the design with a few choice comments that would circulate in some repuke's wallet and make him look at it all the time!

Such a delima!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC