Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesse Jackson Jr. Introduces IRV bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:04 PM
Original message
Jesse Jackson Jr. Introduces IRV bill
H.R. 5293.
Here's the link, but the text of the bill isn't up yet;

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery

Here is a description of the bill from an email:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2004

CONTACT
FRANK E. WATKINS 202.225.xxxx

JACKSON INTRODUCES IRV - INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING

Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., today introduced H.R. 5293,
the Majority Vote Act of 2004 that would require States by
2008 to conduct general elections for Federal office using
an instant runoff voting system. It also directs the
Election Assistance Commission to make grants to States to
defray the costs of administering such systems. The law
would be applied to all federal elections in the States and
include the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, American Samoa, Guam, and the United States Virgin
Islands.

Jackson said, "The term `instant runoff voting system' means
a system for the election of candidates under which `runoff
counts' of candidates are conducted in rounds. Voters vote
by ranking candidates on the ballot according to the order
of their preference. If in any round no candidate receives
a majority of the votes cast, the candidate with the fewest
number of votes is eliminated and the remaining candidates
advance to the next round. In each round a voter shall be
considered to have cast one vote for the candidate the voter
ranked highest on the ballot that has not been eliminated.
The runoff counts are carried out automatically at the time
the votes are cast and tabulated so there is no actual
second election. A candidate is elected only when they
reach 50 percent plus one.

"For example in Florida in 2000 under the instant runoff
system voters would have cast their vote by ranking the
candidates in the order of their choice from among Al Gore,
George Bush, Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan. In this instance
Pat Buchanan finished last so he would be eliminated but his
voters' second choice would be added to the totals of the
other candidates. The same procedure would have been
applied to the candidates with the next fewest votes, in
this instance Ralph Nader. This process would continue
until one of the candidates received 50 percent plus one of
the votes.

"Instant runoff voting insures that a candidate is elected
by a majority of voters and provides the winner with a
mandate to govern. Instant runoff voting prohibits voting
for a candidate who has policies and programs with which you
agree resulting in the election of a candidate who has
policies and programs with which you disagree. The simple
plurality winner system used in most general elections today
creates an incentive for candidates to engage in negative
campaigning. Instant runoff voting encourages candidates to
engage in positive campaigning in order to receive a higher
ranking from their opponents' supporters. Instant runoff
voting is used in Utah Republican Party primaries, Ireland,
Australia and London," Jackson concluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cornus Donating Member (720 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's about time!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go Jesse Jr!
Damn, Illinois has an all-star roster of GREAT Dems!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. This sounds great. But it'll never pass in a Repub Congress.
Still, it's great to put it on the table and force all to vote against it. Then introduce it again later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You may be right, but...
the one thing that should really appeal to conservatives (not necessarily Republicans!) is that this eliminates runoffs, which are expensive. Here in Georgia, runoff elections cost millions of dollars. What conservative wouldn't like that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yippee ! I'm big supporter of Instant Run Off voting
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm reminded of Congressman Dellums (D)CA,
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 07:03 PM by Senior citizen
who introduced a universal health care plan every single year of his 24 years in Congress before he retired. I don't think it was ever permitted to come to a vote, no matter which party controlled Congress or the White House.

I'm voting for Kerry/Edwards. I'm also voting for the Democrats running for Congress in my state. I'm in San Diego, so I'm writing in Donna Frye for Mayor. But I'm choosing the Green Party candidate in every other race. Maybe it is only a sop to my conscience, but if enough people feel and do the same, there will be more Greens in office at the grass roots level, and a clear message to the corporate rulers that we've had enough.

I favor instant runoff voting, and before you start flaming me, please understand that Nader is NOT a Green Party candidate in this election and I am NOT voting for Greens at the national level. I know how important it is to take back the White House, Congress, and eventually the Supreme Court for democracy and civil rights. But I've also lived long enough to understand that just electing Democrats doesn't prevent things like NAFTA, so we need instant runoff in addition to publicly funded elections, verifiable voting processes, the restoration of the Fairness Doctrine, and other reforms.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC