Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How hard would it be to find W's reciever frequency?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:03 AM
Original message
How hard would it be to find W's reciever frequency?
Imagine the fun the debate would be if someone could replace (or jam) his reception.

As the Bush people said there was no reciever and earpiece, they could certainly have no complaints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. That would be fun to watch
How bout a LOUD high pitch squeal so he has to rip it out of his ear in front of an audience and TV cameras :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That would NOT be a good thing. It could break his eardrums.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Oh yea I forgot. That wouldn't be nice now 'wood' it
:nopity:

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm glad you are showing proper remorse.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Exactly HOW would this be a bad thing?
Edited on Mon Oct-11-04 08:28 AM by TankLV
ANd he doesn't listen anyhow, so how would it affect him at all?

Just why should I waste my beautiful mind on something that might damage some part of this piece of excrement again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. It wouldn't be a good thing to be caught advocating on this forum.
Wouldn't be prudent.

Actually I wouldn't give the resident the wax out of my left ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disgruntled_goat Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. radio scanner?
youd have to do some research to narrow the search frequencies - manually scanning every frequency takes a long time..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Impossible, if he doesn't have a receiver
I'm not certain that he has one.

Then again, I never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere stupidity.

--bkl
But I can be convinced
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bill grasso Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. jammed? ... or failed??
judging by his incoherent blatherings, Bush's receiver either failed or was jammed.. Without knowledge of the type unit employed, jamming would be a pretty hit and miss proposition. I think it's possible that some of the broadcasting equipment may have inadvertantly interfered..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Definitely worth the look.....
1000 + young men (and counting) - who have died in *'s misadventure are hoping you can help to end this madness by finding such a link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatgemguy Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Difficult Task
What you're asking is a fairly complex question. There are commercially available devices that would accomplish finding and demodulating an FM signal.

One that comes to mind is made by Optoelectronics, the "X - Sweeper". <http://www.optoelectronics.com/xsweeper.htm>

A task such as this would not be easy, nor inexpensive to do.

With all the radio spectrum that will be in use surrounding the event, (event staff, security, news crews, wireless microphones, etc.) pinpointing one specific frequency would still be a chore. With all of the high tech toys our military and intelligence services have at their disposal and available to the POTUS it may well be impossible. (Think - the number of available frequencies, digital encryption, spread spectrum technology, even infrared light transmissions)

While I do think receiving any transmissions would be difficult, but may be possible, I wouldn't even try to transmit and jam them.

Consider that the authorities will be monitoring the radio spectrum as well, and may be able to pinpoint you and your location. By actively and deliberatly interfering with any legal or licensed transmission you would be setting yourself up for a major league hassle with the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. What's the frequency, Kenneth?
We need to get Dan Rather on this story...


"I think the American people--I hope the American--I don't think, let me--I hope the American people trust me."
- George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Dec. 18, 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. First...
Edited on Mon Oct-11-04 08:19 AM by deseo
... I'm about 60% sure that Bush* is "wired". That said, there are technologies other than RF that may be used to do so.

RF I know, the other technologies I'm less familiar with.

For RF, scanning to find the "frequency" is unlikely to work. Even modern cordless phones use spread-spectrum technology, which means that the signal isn't on a single frequency but is hopping between a set of frequencies at a very rapid rate. With a standard receiver, all you would hear is noise.

Also, as another has mentioned, there will be a boatload of RF there anyway.

The only effective countermeasure I can think of would involve transmitting a "trash" broadband signal, overmodulating it in AM and FM with noise, and sweeping it all over the place. It would need to be a high power signal, at least 10-20 watts output, depending on how close to the "bug" the transmitter can get. Sort of a brute force jam. It would effectively jam all RF devices in the vicinity. It would be highly illegal.

OTOH, trying to actually intercept (listen) to the signal and make a recording would be legal as far as I know. And the tapes would be very interesting, very interesting indeed :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. If furious george is using a receiver....
just think how nervous he and Rove are feeling
now that everyone is suspicious. Do they continue
with the deception or if they do not can he go
it alone? If he's wired on Wednesday I think he
will be so nervous about being caught that it
will show big time in his emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC