Over the weekend, I had this horrible thought. Over the months, we have all been worrying about either an October surprise designed to sway the election, or Bush postponing the election if he thinks he might lose. (BTW, this seems still to be on the table with the infamous Congressional Research Service opinion that the executive has the authority to postpone the elections -- weirdly, still being leaked by Saint Colins State Department, here:
http://fpc.state.gov/fpc/34782.htm )
It occurred to me over the weekend that a more likely outcome is that Bush will lose the election. But then he will try to f**k up things so badly that Kerry will be in deep doodoo on inauguration day.
For example, for those of you who think that within the Bush crime family, the apple does not fall far from the tree, do you remember that Bush Sr. got the US bogged down in Somalia AFTER he lost the election and with only a few days left in his term?
See Somalia timeline at PBS, here:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ambush/etc/cron.htmlOf course, Clinton was devastatingly sabotaged with the black hawk down incident which put him on the defensive with the repugs, who played on his so called draft dodger label and his attempt to integrate gays into the military.
When Bush II loses, do you think he will do something drastic in Iraq to mess up Kerry's first administration? A full scale attack on Faluja that will be a disaster by late January? Simultaneous attacks on the Sunni triangle and the shiite militias which the troops cannot possible maintain simultaneously?
Or will lame duck Bush do what is unthinkable even for an evil moron of criminal background like himself -- attack Iran's nuclear facilities AFTER he doesn't have to take responsibility for the resulting mess?