Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the Sinclair thing is an attempt to prevent F9/11 from airing prior

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 03:51 PM
Original message
So the Sinclair thing is an attempt to prevent F9/11 from airing prior
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 03:52 PM by Caution
to the election. Dems raise a huge stink about this, now if an F9/11 airing is attempted this will be viewed as a "political" commercial as well. That was my first reaction to this thing anyways. Either way Sinclair is doing massive damage to their businesses by pulling this little stunt. Here's hoping it continues to backfire and that one of the networks decides to air F9/11 anyways as an actual legitimate movie and not a campaign commercial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Farenheit 9/11 will be pay-per-view, not free over the public airways.
Huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's too much "nuance" for the freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Got WMD Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's very true
Edited on Tue Oct-12-04 04:42 PM by Got WMD
Linda Vester (Fox) actually asked a Kerry campaign advisor what the difference was between F9/11 being in theaters and this crap airing on Sinclair. She was dead serious, and the "fair and balanced" audience (Dayside) exploded with cheers. Uh Linda... You have to pay to see F9/11????????????????????????????????????????????
Put this shit on pay per view, up against F9/11, and we'll see who does better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. F9/11 would have been PPV either way
Getting it into a network showing was the talk from earlier in the year, this is what Michael Moore wanted to do and was willing to give up on documentary Oscar contention for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC