O'Reilly Sexual Harrassment Suit-- Carribean Showers??? etc

[indigobusiness]

OCTOBER 13--Hours after Bill O'Reilly accused her of a multimillion dollar shakedown attempt, a female Fox News producer fired back at the TV star today, filing a lawsuit claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies. Below you'll find a copy of Andrea Mackris's complaint, an incredible page-turner that quotes O'Reilly, 55, on all sorts of lewd matters. Based on the extensive quotations cited in the complaint, it appears a safe bet that Mackris, 33, recorded some of O'Reilly's more steamy soliloquies. For example, we direct you to his Caribbean shower fantasies. While we suggest reading the entire document, TSG will point you to interesting sections on a Thailand sex show, Al Franken, and the climax of one August 2004 phone conversation. (22 pages)

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html

Bill likes to get freaky...

[indigobusiness]

1. Would somebody define these terms?

I'm still trying to figure out what a 'Dirty Sanchez' is.

[Heddi]

2. Dirty Sanchez

is when a man is performing anal sex, and he pulls the penis out and makes a poo-poo moustache on the face of the receiver by wiping his poo-poo covered penis on the receiver's upper lip.

Please don't ask how I know this

[indigobusiness]

3. I had to ask...

Do they then take a Carribean shower?

[Heddi]

7. I don't know what a carribean shower is

but I wonder if he had a steaming cup of Hot Karl afterwards?

[charlie]

4. You don't want to know...

but if you must, it's here, and plenty more.

[Heddi]

9. That is the best website I've ever seen

now my vocabulary of terms that 98% of the population don't know has just increased dramatically.

Hot Karl, for example---99% of people don't have a clue what Hot Karl is, including one very prudish and prickish wench I used to work with.

Every morning, another co-worker and I would always see Ms. Prick at the coffee machine and ask her if she was looking forward to her daily steaming cup of Hot Karl. Thinking she was Ms. Popularity and just *had* to know all the "in" things, she'd laugh and say Yes and go on and on about how she liked her Hot Karl with cream and sugar blah blah blah.

It was so astoundingly funny that I nearly pissed myself on several occasions.

Sometimes she'd have a coffee-foam moustache when she was drinking a latte and my fiendish coworker and I would always tell her that she had Dirty Sanchez on her face. Her bewildered look and vapid laugh made the moment just that much funnier

[charlie]

11. Yikes!

I was innocent of Hot Karls until a minute ago, too. Poor woman. Haw! :D

[stanwyck]

5. either she had a recorder

or she needs to be writing for the porn magazines. Now I have that horrible image of O'Reilly in the shower in my head. Not erotic. I know this stuff is sludge. I hated it when Clinton got tarred with it. And I even am queasy about it with O'Reilly, who I detest.
What I am getting a vicious thrill out of is the karma. Here's a guy who is always posing. He projects an image with no basis in fact. He's not a street tough Irish kid who brawled his way to the top. He's the product of an affluent famiily, Ivy League education, who was in the right place at the right time. And, he's shrewd. He's quick to moralize. He's quick to judge. He's been very eloquent on Hollywood's immorality and that of his Democratic advesaries. He's not the upstanding Catholic family man, either. He's an ego-driven poser. Just like Rush. They're fakes. I feel sorry for the people in their personal lives.
We are all human with our frailties. It's the moral outrage these guys project: the people they hate and demoralize. That's why I appreciate the karma. The victimizers have become the victims. May they learn humility.

[indigobusiness]

8. If this is bogus, she will be crucified...

This is way to elaborate to be cooked up.

[demobabe]

6. This is WRONG - O'Reilly coverup

look at the dates on the lawsuits - it's the other way around. the producer's lawsuit was dated September 28, and the court filed it on October 13. O'Reilly's lawsuit is dated October 13, and has yet to be filed by the court. O'Reilly's folks are trying to cover this up and minimalize it - they're in a bad position.

[indigobusiness]

10. Very Interesting...O'Reilly is a bigger creep than I figured

...and I had him below Limbaugh on my creep-o-meter.