RollergirlVT
(452 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 09:48 PM
Original message |
|
From our Constitution: Article XIV. Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. With this in mind, how could a gay couple denied a marriage license by any state, not win a discrimination suit?
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I think that's why they tried to pass a constitutional amendment |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that nothing prevents a gay person from marrying someone of the opposite sex, therefore it is "equal" protection.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
3. well I know the supreme court |
|
recently said disabled persons could not sue the state for damages (in Alabama). Said it was up to the states. 14th ammendment didn't apply to that person as a protected class. I guess they will say sexual orientation isn't a protected class either, I just don't know.
|
cardlaw
(228 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-14-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Not Article XIV, Amendment XIV |
|
But the whole thing is there are different tests under equal protection for who gets what coverage: strict scrutiny, heightened scrutiny, and reasonable basis.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message |