Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox trying to fire Bill O'Reilly accuser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 04:38 PM
Original message
Fox trying to fire Bill O'Reilly accuser
Kos of www.dailykos.com speculates that Bill O'Reilly is behind the possible firing of woman who says O'Reilly sexually harrassed her:

Fox tries to fire O'Reilly accuser
by kos
Sat Oct 16th, 2004 at 17:44:45 GMT

I am not forming an opinion on the O'Reily allegations until evidence is put forth (it's too easy to accuse). But Fox has made a huge PR blunder by firing the accuser.
Scandal-hit Fox News moved yesterday to fire an employee who says she was sexually harassed by Bill O'Reilly - but wants a judge to declare the canning isn't retribution.

Andrea Mackris, 33, said she was served legal papers about her termination by a man lying in wait for her at her Manhattan apartment building.

The documents said Fox had asked a judge to let the TV station dump her from a $93,200-a-year job as associate producer on "The O'Reilly Factor" - and to rule that the firing was not in retaliation for her accusations about the show's host.
Obviously she couldn't continue working for O'Reilly's show. But Fox News is a big operation. They should've simply transferred her to a different department pending the outcome of litigation.

But it's obvious O'Reilly has a lot of pull in the network, and it was probably under his orders she was canned. Indeed, it was under O'Reilly's orders that Fox sued Al Franken for his Lying Liars book -- giving the book a huge sales boost and turning O'Reilly into an object of derision.

Ol' Bill is a hothead, and clearly lets his emotions override reason when he feels slighted. Fox should learn to stand up to the megalomaniac and tell him to let the professionals handle things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Note to Judge - Cut & Paste phrase - "Wholly without merit."
This woman is being fired for no other reason than filing a complaint against Bill O'Reilly. Fox will have to answer two questions:

1) Would this woman have been fired if there were no lawsuit?

2) Even if the answer is yes, does the lawsuit have any bearing in the decision.

If the answer isn't "no" to both questions, then it is retaliation. In addition, Fox is an accomplice to the sexual harassment for firing her. What kind of HR department does Fox employ? Only a complete idiot wouldn't see what that Fox is shooting itself in the foot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dulusion knows no bounds...They are all deluded and out of control when
dealing with reality and reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Something's missing here
Howcome O'Reilly hasn't been fired or at least suspended? These are the same people who demanded Clinton be removed from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. nothing missing here, King
it's republican hypocrisy at its finest. Welcome to the DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC