TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:32 PM
Original message |
Alert Faux News Watch on now... will they dare broach O'Reilly? |
|
I'll record if they do...
|
billyoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Alert Faux News Watch on now... will they dare broach O'Reilly? |
|
Surely you jest. Faux News will be the very *last* station to let the Kerry mention of Mary Cheney die. And oh yes, that's what they're still talking about.
|
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. well it has talked about negative Faux News stories before |
|
though they normally relegate them towards the end of the program, even if they are the big media stories of the week. It was the show that talked about 'Outfoxed' when I doubt their other shows did.
|
Cat Atomic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh you bet. Otherwise they might have to talk about Iraq. |
billyoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Oh you bet. Otherwise they might have to talk about Iraq. |
|
Well, you're right, right at the end "we don't know enough to form an opinion on the subject." Funny, I don't remember that ever stopping them before.
|
TheWebHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
4. well Eric Burns mentioned the elephant in the room |
|
but said "we don't have enough information yet" to discuss it and "we'll cover the coverage" in the future.. blah blah blah. Lame, but what can you expect from Faux.
|
tishaLA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. They were so full of shit |
|
They were bad enough last week when they gave a whole segment to the Halperin memo but gave just seconds to Carl Cameron's shenanigans. This week was worse. They don't NEED facts--they are talking about the coverage. They covered the coverage about WMD, too, and they never knew the facts until it was too late.
What utter bullshit they are.
|
dogtag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They just announced that they will NOT talk about O'Lielly. |
|
Why not? Because they don't know enough about the case to have an opinion the host said with a serious face.
That's never stopped them before! lol, lol, lol.
|
alvis
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. I suppose no one at Faux News would actually ask O'Lielly |
|
about it. With all those Faux "journalists" there, maybe one would ask him about it...
|
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. When was having an opinion crucial to reporting? |
Cat Atomic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
We decide, report, and then you decide.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 03:19 AM
Response to Original message |