Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEW YORK TIMES ENDORSES KERRY!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 09:57 PM
Original message
NEW YORK TIMES ENDORSES KERRY!!!
Sorry if this has beeb posted already, but Carol Lin just said the NYT has endorsed Kerry - will run in tomorrow's paper!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. probably a multidupe but
worth seeing again. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. God I bet Carol choked when she had to say that
Guess Kerry didn't "shoot his wad" yet, Carol! :wave:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can't say
this is a surprise but I'm grateful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, that was surely no surprise. (eom)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. An excellent read!................
The Bush White House has always given us the worst aspects of the American right without any of the advantages. We get the radical goals but not the efficient management. The Department of Education's handling of the No Child Left Behind Act has been heavily politicized and inept. The Department of Homeland Security is famous for its useless alerts and its inability to distribute antiterrorism aid according to actual threats. Without providing enough troops to properly secure Iraq, the administration has managed to so strain the resources of our armed forces that the nation is unprepared to respond to a crisis anywhere else in the world.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/opinion/17sun1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I agree not a surprise but their write-up was fabulous! :) nom
nom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. It reads like an indictment of Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. No surprise there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did they endorse gore last time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. They haven't
supported a republican for pres in 48 years. 1956- Ike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Artemis Bunyon Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. They wrote this for history's sake. They knew they were writing history.
A historical document in that it is about history in the making, but also historical in tenor and temperment.

Reading this almost makes yer old pal Jerky wonder who kidnapped and replaced the NYT editorial three and a half years ago -- during which time they did much to enable the very policies they now decry -- and when did the Old Guard manage to find their way back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Good assessment...they are writing history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Very Inspiring




It has re-energized me

16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Here it is (partial)
Senator John Kerry goes toward the election with a base that is built more on opposition to George W. Bush than loyalty to his own candidacy. But over the last year we have come to know Mr. Kerry as more than just an alternative to the status quo. We like what we've seen. He has qualities that could be the basis for a great chief executive, not just a modest improvement on the incumbent.

We have been impressed with Mr. Kerry's wide knowledge and clear thinking - something that became more apparent once he was reined in by that two-minute debate light. He is blessedly willing to re-evaluate decisions when conditions change. And while Mr. Kerry's service in Vietnam was first over-promoted and then over-pilloried, his entire life has been devoted to public service, from the war to a series of elected offices. He strikes us, above all, as a man with a strong moral core....

...We look back on the past four years with hearts nearly breaking, both for the lives unnecessarily lost and for the opportunities so casually wasted. Time and again, history invited George W. Bush to play a heroic role, and time and again he chose the wrong course. We believe that with John Kerry as president, the nation will do better.

Voting for president is a leap of faith. A candidate can explain his positions in minute detail and wind up governing with a hostile Congress that refuses to let him deliver. A disaster can upend the best-laid plans. All citizens can do is mix guesswork and hope, examining what the candidates have done in the past, their apparent priorities and their general character. It's on those three grounds that we enthusiastically endorse John Kerry for president.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/opinion/17sun1.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print&position=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC