Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Will Oscar Listen? Fahrenheit 9/11 v. The Passion of Christ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 12:18 PM
Original message
Newsweek: Will Oscar Listen? Fahrenheit 9/11 v. The Passion of Christ
'Fahrenheit 9/11' and 'The Passion' were the most electrifying movies of the year. Will Hollywood honor one—or snub the other—to make a point?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6257067/site/newsweek/

Oct. 25 issue - Millions of people surely believe that Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" and Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" deserve best-picture Oscar nominations. Unfortunately, most of them don't vote for the Academy Awards. Despite shattering box-office records and dominating headlines for months, these two films face real obstacles in the race for Hollywood's top prize. Of the many high-placed studio executives, producers, Oscar strategists, publicists and Academy members interviewed for this story, most think that "Fahrenheit's" chances depend on the results of the presidential election, and all say that a "Passion" best-picture nod is almost unthinkable. Hollywood, with its Jewish roots, did not experience "The Passion" as a transcendent religious and emotional event, as so many other viewers did. Some haven't forgiven Gibson for even making the film, let alone forgotten his father, Hutton, and his inflammatory statements about the history of the Jews. "I'll tell you why 'The Passion' won't be nominated," snaps one industry executive. "Happily, there are too many people in the Academy who believe the Holocaust actually happened."

.....

Moore's "Fahrenheit" is facing an entirely different problem. Its anti-Bush, antiwar content plays like gangbusters in liberal Hollywood, but even people who love it wonder if it rises to the level of artistry and timelessness worthy of a best-picture nomination. "Even if they think Moore's the modern equivalent of Thomas Paine," says one executive, "that doesn't mean they think it's great filmmaking." The movie was considered almost certain to win the best-documentary Oscar until Moore decided he would rather broadcast the movie on pay-per-view television the night before the election, making it ineligible in that category, and put his chips on a best-picture bid instead. "It's thumbing your nose at a sure thing," says one rival. "Even I don't have that much gall." If Moore's gamble pays off, it could become the first documentary in history to get a best-picture nomination. It's already the highest-grossing doc ever—$119 million—and sold $4.7 million in DVDs its first week of release.

Most insiders believe its fate is inextricably tied to the election—but they can't agree on whether a Bush or a Kerry win helps Moore the most. "If John Kerry wins, 'Fahrenheit' gets nominated," says one exec. "Then it becomes 'the movie that changed the course of American history,' and the perception will be that Moore contributed to Bush's loss." Or not. "Its chances are zero if Kerry wins, because then the protest is over and everybody feels better," says another source. And, says one Academy member, "If Kerry loses, it gets nominated as a big 'f-- you' to Bush."


....more....http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6257067/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. i thought MM had taken it out of Oscar running by releasing the DVD
and trying to get it on PPV?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. removed from Best Documentary
Edited on Sun Oct-17-04 12:26 PM by tinanator
and he doesnt need another one of those. If Kill Bill wont get Best Picture (being the best movie ever made;) ) then Farenheit certainly should. Good Luck Michael.
Any word about supporting actors? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. There it is
Three paragraphs that make it clear as glass that the Oscars have fuck-all to do with the quality of a film. I haven't the faintest idea why public attention is held in thrall of this high school pageantry year after year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's always been true.
Or at least since the 1950's.

I found out when Annie Hall beat Star Wars for best picture.

It was confirmed to me when 'Hoop Dreams' didn't win best documentary because 'It's already made enough money'.

Oscar's are often about what you did last year but didn't get a award for... "You were great in <blank>, but we didn't nominate you because we needed to give one to what's his name because he was overdue, you were mediocre this year but because we snubbed you last year we'll give you one anyway""o, you like me!"

I only check out the oscars to see who was nominated, and I'll look the day after (never watch the show) to see who got snubbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC