Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why aren't people screaming about this??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:54 PM
Original message
Why aren't people screaming about this??
I wonder if this will be leaked out next week?? I still think the CIA is pissed and this is the smoking gun...I can only pray...


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-scheer19oct19,1,6762967.column?coll=la-util-op-ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Requires registration.
Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's worth registrering for
Just give them garbage data - garbage in...

The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket
October 19, 2004

COMMENTARY

It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

When I asked about the report, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) sent a letter 14 days ago asking for it to be delivered. "We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report," she said. "We are very concerned."

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Alternet has got it as well
Edited on Tue Oct-19-04 05:02 PM by Mojambo
I've forwarded the story to a bunch of TV media outlets.

I suggest everyone does the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. not now it doesn't - someone must have fixed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Here is another thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Buzzflash.com has it too !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. So, thats it...you give up?
I can tell you how to easily register if you'd like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriate Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. don't give them your real info
if that is a problem for you. When I have to register, it's as Griselda Punkinstein, at 1313 Mockingbird Lane, Wienerville, Usbekistan - or something similar, considering on how evil I feel.

Or use bugmenot.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueNomad Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. ...
ROFLMAO....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. What is the article about for those of us who don't
want to register?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Here's some snips cut to 4 paragraphs
<snip> It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

<snip>"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

<snip>According to the intelligence official, who spoke to me on condition of anonymity, release of the report, which represents an exhaustive 17-month investigation by an 11-member team within the agency, has been "stalled." First by acting CIA Director John McLaughlin and now by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican House member (and chairman of the Intelligence Committee) who recently was appointed CIA chief by President Bush.

<snip>"What all the other reports on 9/11 did not do is point the finger at individuals, and give the how and what of their responsibility. This report does that," said the intelligence official. "The report found very senior-level officials responsible."

Boys and girls, looks a lot like a smoking gun and one that men in high places are working to hide. Let us hope some honorable partiots in the agancy, and there are some, have this move in their chess game with the checkers players in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. John Kerry needs to call Bush out on this!
Everywhere Kerry goes to speak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because we don't know what the hell the article says?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpcmxr Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Here you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Thanks!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. This story has been all over the web today. It's been all over this place
today. It is a big story. But like the Cheney Energy meeting papers, the bush* administration will stall and screw us (the American people) around forever.

This has to be the potential to be our October surprise, but someone just has to find a way to get ahold of it. A patriotic leaker?

I bet Tenet's name is all over the thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Well, now we know why they rushed Porter Goss into there
He's a rabid neocon and a reliable yesman. Perhaps they were afraid Tenet was sick of falling on his sword for their incompetence and forced him out just in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Oh yeah.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Be more direct on your title
It may be something to be
really angry about
or somebody lost their girl friend
with that type of heading in general discuss thread.
what's the story heading?
We're listening, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm registering now...(might as well) but....
It might help if you put an excerpt up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's a snip and a tip
ROBERT SCHEER
The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket
The agency is withholding a damning report that points at senior officials.
Robert Scheer

October 19, 2004

It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

When I asked about the report, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) sent a letter 14 days ago asking for it to be delivered. "We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report," she said. "We are very concerned."

<snip>


TIP

http://www.bugmenot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. LA Times
no turning back now
not smart to make them his "fall guy"
yummy news b4 election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hey, maybe we should write letters to members of the congressional....
intelligence committees demanding that they get a hold of this so that we can have a better idea of who to vote for prior to the election, in relation to security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. The Article
Edited on Tue Oct-19-04 05:13 PM by Jack_Dawson
The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket
The agency is withholding a damning report that points at senior officials.


It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names. Although the report by the inspector general's office of the CIA was completed in June, it has not been made available to the congressional intelligence committees that mandated the study almost two years ago.

"It is infuriating that a report which shows that high-level people were not doing their jobs in a satisfactory manner before 9/11 is being suppressed," an intelligence official who has read the report told me, adding that "the report is potentially very embarrassing for the administration, because it makes it look like they weren't interested in terrorism before 9/11, or in holding people in the government responsible afterward."

When I asked about the report, Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), ranking Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) sent a letter 14 days ago asking for it to be delivered. "We believe that the CIA has been told not to distribute the report," she said. "We are very concerned."

According to the intelligence official, who spoke to me on condition of anonymity, release of the report, which represents an exhaustive 17-month investigation by an 11-member team within the agency, has been "stalled." First by acting CIA Director John McLaughlin and now by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican House member (and chairman of the Intelligence Committee) who recently was appointed CIA chief by President Bush.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. This paragraph ALONE should cost Bush his job!!!
<<And then Bush refused to testify to the commission under oath, or on the record. Instead he deigned only to chat with the commission members, with Vice President Dick Cheney present, in a White House meeting in which commission members were not allowed to take notes. All in all, strange behavior for a man who seeks reelection to the top office in the land based on his handling of the so-called war on terror.>>

Do any of the kind, but totally fucking confused, people that are voting for Bush because they think he can keep us safe, REMEMBER this?? HE REFUSED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH!! He REFUSED TO TESTIFY ALONE! AND.. NO ONE WAS ALLOWED TO TAKE NOTES, NOR was anything ON THE RECORD.

What does he have to hide?? We won't KNOW until AFTER the election, thanks to the Bush family HOLD on the CIA!!! :grr:

How in the FUCK anyone who lost a loved one on 9/11 could support that cowardly failure, is beyond me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I wish Kerry would use the "Oath" thing too..
"In my administration, when I or any member of my cabinet are questioned by congress or high ranking commisions, we won't hesitate to TAKE AN OATH"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. So true, Caliphoto
What is wrong with people? How can they not see through *'s duplicity and deceit? How can they actually believe anyone in his administration truly cares about this nation?

Idiots: anyone who supports * after all the pain he has caused the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Gee...I seem to recall that the CIA initiated the Plame case, and...
...they've been responsible for tons of leaks since that time.

Look at it this way...who leaked this portion of the report to the media, particularly at this point in time?

Still think the CIA folks are the bad guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StupidFOX Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. Thanks, Big Brother!
"By law, the only legitimate reason the CIA director has for holding back such a report is national security. Yet neither Goss nor McLaughlin has invoked national security as an explanation for not delivering the report to Congress."

Protect us from important information, for our own security!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC