Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HereÕs a brilliant point Ted Koppel made last night.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
soundfury Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:37 PM
Original message
HereÕs a brilliant point Ted Koppel made last night.

If you saw Nightline last night, Ted Koppel said 3,000 people died from terrorism on 911; however, 36,000 people die from the flu EVERY year.

WeÕve spent billions on combating terrorism so we wonÕt have to fight it here blah, blah, blah.

Yet, we are unwilling to pay for the production of the flu vaccine?

DiscussÉ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's to discuss?
Koppel is right, and Bush is a total failure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Those are poor and old people...
...so the media doesn't care about them. Since the media doesn't care about them, the apathetic populace doesn't hear about it, and they can spend their time on more important things, like watching the latest incarnation of Survivor and figuring out which fast food they want to eat. Since 9/11 could not be ignored by the media, the ruling administration co-opted it to meet its own ends, using the media to feed directives and suggestions to the apathetic public.

If Brad Pitt died from the flu, there would be public outrage that couldn't be ignored, the media would flog the story to death, the current administration would be forced to give it lip service, and a number of American corporations would see profit in producing flu vaccinations for the newly-created consumers. Still, no one would care about the poor and the old.

That said, I hope Brad Pitt doesn't die from the flu. I don't know him, but I'd probably like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jeez putting it in that light makes it even more depressing...especially
for the poor 18 year olds crawling around the desert looking for what was it flu vaccines? No...WMD? No...Al Queda? No...ah yes freedom? Poor Iraqis too, awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure; 6000 people a DAY die of communicable disease in Africa.

Kind of puts things in perspective, doesn't it.

I'm so sick of these guys invoking 9/11 to justify every bad decision they make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. incompetence incompetence incompetence
IHT reports we are the ONLY major country that doesn't have enough flu vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually...
Koppel had several good points, but another salient observation.

Bush repeatedly attacks Kerry's health care plan as involving health care "rationing." Except, that is EXACTLY what Bush is doing now wiht the flu vaccine. That is EXACTLY what happens, and what must happen, when there is not enough of a certain commodity to satisfy the demand for it. BUSH is already rationing, but his handlers are at least smart enough not to call it that.

More pig lipstick from your friends at BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ranec Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not sure these comparisons are necessarily valid.
We can't ignore the fact that 9/11 was horrible and addressing terrorism is a key goal for anyone leading this country. Kerry has a better, smarter, even more sensitive plan for fighting terrorism.

Besides,10 years ago I don't remember any talk about flu vaccines. I think the crisis is somewhat self-propelled. Breathless reports on the news drive people to stand in long lines.

That being said, I agree that if market forces are preventing companies from producing the vaccine, then it is right and proper for the government to step in and provide this service. I feel the same way about other vaccines. This should be part of the mandate of NIH.

The evidence is strongly that the administration new this was coming, and decided to have faith and hope for the best rather than try to develop a contingency plan. Great work W!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Obviously, you did not have an immune-compromised relative...
ten years ago. I did & she got flu shots every year. One old gentleman standing in line here in Houston was concerned about getting really sick. He was fairly healthy & living independently but a bout of pneumonia & a long hospital stay might make an end to that. Even if he lived, he'd be more likely to need assisted living--and he wanted to avoid it.

Most of the people in the long lines really need the vaccine. I'm glad you've avoided knowing anybody dealing with illness and/or old age. It's really a drag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I believe Ranec's point is that...
if the government hadn't announced this flu shot shortage, there wouldn't be the long lines of people - including many healthy ones - panicked about a flu shot.

Because in years past, health providers in the media practically had to beg people to go out and get flu shots; many Americans just weren't very worried about it.

Right before the shortage was announced, I remember a doctor appearing on a morning news show, saying they were going to really start pushing for everyone to get flu vaccines, as a routine.

He wanted the public to realize it was serious. Because a lot of people just weren't doing it.

Then, when the shortage was announced, it seemed that everyone was suddenly worried.

Ranec making this point doesn't mean he hasn't known or taken care of sick people. I agree with his point, and I am speaking as an ill person who has also taken care of ill people. Last year I was very worried about the flu shot for someone in my care, but he wasn't concerned and didn't want the shot.

-wildflower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. None of you may be old enough to remember when the
government was giving flu shots to the elderly and hundreds died from the shot itself. Did that stop the government from continuing the program? Hell, no, they kept right on giving those shots. I'll always believe that that fiasco was to thin the herd of the elderly. It reminded me of Jonestown; people dying by the hundreds from the shot, yet old people lining up the get the shot. I'm beginning to think we've been a sick society for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. well, it was only 8 or so years ago
that the FDA officially recommended the flu shot for people. It saves thousands of lives a year. It is believed that within five years, the FDA will reccomend Flu shots for everyone. But to be honest, if you are healthy, between ten and fifty and don't work with the infirm, children, the elderly or anyone with a supressed immune system, you don't really need the flu shot. Sure, the flu sucks, but it most likely won't actually kill you. Anyone in those other groups actually has a pretty good chance of dying from the flu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's not just people at risk of dying from the flu, it's also flu vectors
Lots of people come into contact with hundreds of vulnerable people everyday, like taxi drivers, teachers, nurses, etc...

This is the first year since they started giving the vaccine that most of those people will not be able to get a shot. That means they will spread it to hundreds of other people they come into contact with, who will in turn spread it to others, etc...

I've been in the taxi business for 15+ years and got a flu shot every year since they started giving them. However, this year we were told our drivers couldn't get their flu shots. Since taxi drivers don't make money unless they work, I can guarantee you that we will have a bunch of sick drivers working this winter. I can also guarantee that they will end up getting a lot of passengers sick with the flu after sitting with them in a closed up cab.

Same goes for any of the other groups considered likely disease vectors -- like people working in fast food restaurants (who can't afford to take days off, either), grade school teachers, bus drivers, airline flight attendants, etc... None of those groups are going to get shots this year.

If the flu hits hard this year, it will end up spreading far, far faster and wider than it has in the past.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soundfury Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Flu Hype vs Terrorism Hype
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 01:31 PM by soundfury
{ { {Besides,10 years ago I don't remember any talk about flu vaccines. I think the crisis is somewhat self-propelled. Breathless reports on the news drive people to stand in long lines.} } }

I agree with you that there has been a lot of hype surrounding the flu vaccines but when
you compare the number of deaths created by terrorism to the number of deaths created by the flu,
itÕs clear that the flu is more of a danger to the public safety (in terms of deaths) than terrorism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drunkdriver-in-chief Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Same can be said about guns and cars
32,000 americans are killed by guns each year though half those are suicides and should be ignored. 42,000 are killed by cars and that is really inexcusable since we know how to stop that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC