Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blair appears to have become a compulsive liar like Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:29 PM
Original message
Blair appears to have become a compulsive liar like Bush
I do not know how many of you watched Prime Minister's Question Time last week in the British Parliament when Blair was questioned about the redeployment of the British Black Watch troops.

Blair said that they reason they were likely to be reployed was because they had some "special skills" which the American forces lacked!!

Now we find out that the British troops are only being redeployed so as to free American troops so that they can be moved to Fallujah - no "special skills" involved here!!

It appears that, like Bush, Blair has become a compulsive liar unable to tell a single line in truth - the only difference being he has the power oif his verbal skills in doing it, unlike Bush!!

Have not seen any British newspapers hammer him on this as yet!

Jacob Matthan
Oulu, Finland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Blair = compulsive liar
Bush = repulsive liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeAnnan Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. But Uncle Leo told them both it is OK to lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree about "compulsive liar". . . "Arselicker" is more like it.
Edited on Fri Oct-22-04 03:44 PM by frankzappa
"Yankee Poodle Tony" Blair has sucked up to every American President since he became PM of the UK.


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Special skill: well trained, and have all equipment they need.
The US could use some of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Black Watch may have sufficient training
but plenty of the British Territorial Army out there doesn't:

1,000 Territorial Army soldiers failed gun test

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=574859
Nearly 1,000 Territorial Army soldiers were sent to fight in Iraq despite failing their weapons test, a court martial heard today.


See disscussion in http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=924184

And British equipment has been just as lacking as American in Iraq:

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1359712003
The admission, in the long-awaited defence white paper, coincided with the publication of a damning report on the handling of the war in Iraq and an accusation from the chairman of an influential Commons committee that British troops in Iraq had been "shamefully let down" by the government.

The report, published by the National Audit Office (NAO), described the campaign in Iraq as a significant military success but lambasted the government for sending troops into combat without adequate equipment, including weapons, ammunition, body armour and medical supplies.

The findings were described by Edward Leigh, the chairman of the Commons public accounts committee, as an "outrage".

"We expect the men and women of the armed forces to fight and maybe die for us. So it is an outrage that they could not expect all of the proper equipment, protection and even clothing to do the job we ask of them. They were shamefully let down," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Frontline combat unit
Most of the US forces deployed in iraq are not combat units.
Black watch is, and that is why he said that.

As well, the argument goes, that realpolitik in iraq dictates
that the allied forces that occupy the country share the
burden... and that the british have it easy as the south
of the country is not near as problematic as the areas the USA
is patrolling. As long as we're deployed in a joint military
operation, allies have obligations to share the load.

There is the well founded theory that the british areas of iraq are
much safer due to the british policy of using positive reinforcement
rather than deadly force to engage the local population... and many
british newspapers are pissed off that the american forces abusive
tendency to shoot civilians and mass murder with bombs creates
the very horror they claim to be fighting... and that british
soldiers will now be put in the line of fire and associated with
the war crimes of the american forces.

Black watch is as crack as they come, a perthshire regiment
(scotland north of edinburgh - where ewan macgregor (young 0bi wan)
is from). There is the hope that they will be able to reverse the
american nightmare by being impeccable, as they've been in the
south of the country.

I wish them godspeed, that they return home to bonnie scotland safely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC