|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 02:54 PM Original message |
New York Times runs story from rightwing website banned by FREE REPUBLIC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PROGRESSIVE1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. The NY Times and Wash Post also published WITH PRIDE.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 04:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. RWers were intent on establishing a fascist state in America at that time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ridiculous. WimpChimp's IQ is barely above his shoe size. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Also contributing was Charles Murray, racist pig author of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PragMantisT (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. HAHA the vdare.com logo is "the white dough" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cat Atomic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. Please. Even Bush's fans admit that he's not a brain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. They aren't implying that Bush actually "took" either of those tests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yewberry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. Seems to be a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. This was in Kitty Kelley's book. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. SATs weren't scored in increments of 10 back in the 1960s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. That's correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
number6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. LOL, LOL and LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Also, it's important to consider drug use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceForever (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. Even if it is true that Kerry's IQ is lower, it's irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
13. The SAT does not measure intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. They're citing a racist website that uses SAT's to show that blacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drunkdriver-in-chief (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
15. I think bush was smart - 35 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. I can't believe John Kerry could get into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhereIsMyFreedom (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-04 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
18. Completely bogus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC