|
Edited on Sun Oct-24-04 11:05 PM by Merlin
I'm sure this is way too long to do anybody any good in convincing a former vet about the Swift Boat Liars, but I'll put it out here just in case. It's the truth.
I fought for 19 months in combat in Vietnam (I-Corps, Americal Div) as an artillery officer, was awarded the Bronze Star with "V" like Kerry for a rescue operation, and returned to join Kerry and the VVAW in opposing the war.
In my view, the Kerry campaign should have fought the Swift Liars point for point via the Vets for Kerry and Band of Brothers, but they have chosen not to. So let me deal with the lies here, one by one.
1) Why Did We Oppose The War? It was clear by 1968 that the US would NEVER do what was necessary to win that war. In order to win it, we would have had to go into N. Vietnam. (You can't win a war on defense.) But it was obvious we would never attack N Vietnam. Why? Because the Chinese had warned us against it, and the Chinese had the bomb. (Remember that in Korea, the Chinese sent 1 Million Chinese soldiers over the border forcing us into a retreat--and that was BEFORE they had the bomb and AFTER we had it. You can imagine how frightened the LBJ and Nixon administrations were of Chinese intervention.) So if we were never to do the only thing we could have done that would win the war, it meant we were destined to spend US lives to perpetuate a stalemate. We VVAW members believed it was the patriotic thing to do to demand an end to the war. If anybody thinks it was easy to take that position and risk the wrath of the WWII vets, who didn't understand Vietnam, they are nuts. It took a lot of guts for all the guys to march against that war.
2) What about the Claims of War Crimes Many aspects of formal US POLICY in Vietnam were in fact in violation of the Geneva Conventions. (a) When I was in charge of artillery at LZ West, we would fire high explosive artillery rounds at random locations in the countryside throughout every night focussing on paths between villages. This "Harrassment and Interdiction" fire was a direct violation of Geneva Convention rules about free fire zones in populated areas. (b) Rampant racism against all Vietnamese was never officially discouraged. I once had a conversation with all of the chaplains of the Americal Division--all officers--about incorporating in their sermons reminders to the GIs to treat the Vietnamese people humanely and graciously--instead of calling them gooks and dinks and slopes and throwing C-rats at kids who chased our A-cavs and demonizing them as subhuman. Their response (this was over beers at the O-club) was that "The Colonel would be furious if we did that." This isn't a violation of the Geneva Conventions, but is a violation of common sense, since we were there supposedly to "save" these people, and the ONLY way we could succeed was to "win their hearts and minds." (c) Free Fire Zones were in place in many areas which included populated villages, a violation of the Geneva Conventions. (d) In BROAD DAYLIGHT we BOMBED the CITY of Ben Tre in March, 1967, a city of 35,000 people. We bombed it with B-52 strikes. The Colonel in charge of it stood by on a nearby hill watching as he was inteviewed by a Time correspondent. I remember reading this while getting ready to ship out to Nam and was appalled. The reporter couldn't believe what we were doing, and asked the Colonel why in God's name we were bombing a CITY of 35,000 CIVILIANS??? The Colonel answered, famously, "Well, in the course of events, it became necessary to destroy the city in order to save it." THAT WAS A VIOLATION OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS! So Kerry was absolutely RIGHT in testifying that US MILITARY POLICY included practices which violated the Geneva Conventions--and THAT was a violation of American law.
3) What about claims that Kerry's Testimony Delayed POW Releases? Nonsense. If we had not marched and testified and FORCED this country to end that war, the POWs would have been in those camps for many more years while Nixon delayed and delayed and delayed.
4) What About the Testimony Bringing Shame to the US? How is it that telling the truth brings shame upon any nation? Want to know what really brought shame on us? The facts that were being revealed; the racist attitudes that were being perpetuated; and stupid military policies being followed; the lies being told; and the failure to prevent scandalous atrocities, most notably that of My Lai.
It's too bad good people are being sucked up into these Swift Boat Liars' claims. Evidently they just can't remember the lessons of Vietnam. Evidently that's why we're apparently doomed to repeat them--at least until January 21, 2005 rolls around.
|